![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why is NASA giving such small consideration to the mars landers?
The MER 2 press conference was cut short to show yet another grocery delivery to ISS. Does anyone, excluding scientists performing yet another life science experiment, care? I get the feeling that NASA is trying to minimize MER for unknown reasons. Any answers? Jim Davis. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jimmydevice wrote in
: Why is NASA giving such small consideration to the mars landers? The MER 2 press conference was cut short to show yet another grocery delivery to ISS. Does anyone, excluding scientists performing yet another life science experiment, care? I get the feeling that NASA is trying to minimize MER for unknown reasons. Any answers? Those of us who remember Progress-Mir remain keenly interested in Progress dockings. If NASA were to avoid televising them, I'm sure some would start hatching conspiracy theories as to why. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's a big difference between moon rovers and mars rovers. Moon rovers
don't have to be autonomous - they can be driven directly from Earth. Communications is also much easier, and there is far more sunlight for solar panels. Landing on the moon is easier, too. Low gravity and no atmosphere makes the whole thing much more controllable. And we don't need the whole parachute-airbag-retro rocket-petal landing system - just a retro rocket pack. How much of the Mars rover budgets are tied up in the deep space network costs, I wonder? Jodrell bank also spends a lot of time talking to Mars. The Moon should be much cheaper. In fact, there's a private moon shot planned for the near future, that is going to put an impactor on the moon. "jimmydevice" wrote in message ... Why is NASA giving such small consideration to the mars landers? The MER 2 press conference was cut short to show yet another grocery delivery to ISS. Does anyone, excluding scientists performing yet another life science experiment, care? I get the feeling that NASA is trying to minimize MER for unknown reasons. Any answers? Jim Davis. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jimmydevice" wrote in message
... | Why is NASA giving such small consideration to the mars landers? | The MER 2 press conference was cut short to show yet another grocery | delivery to ISS. Does anyone, excluding scientists performing yet | another life science experiment, care? I get the feeling that NASA | is trying to minimize MER for unknown reasons. Any answers? | Jim Davis. Oh, come on now, standard news criteria, show something live if you can. The Mars rovers are a bit like the old robots we used to build at school, where you would input commands, then wait and see if what you expected, happens. I'm sure that plenty of trumpet sounding will occurr when a significant discovery is made. Besides, if you were being nice to the Russians to keep them sweet, as you need their help, it always helps to show their prowess in space....:-) Brian -- Brian Gaff.... graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________ __________________________________ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free, so there! Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 30/01/04 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|