![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reading in Popular Mechanics about a harebrained scheme to mine
the He3 from the moon to provide nuclear electricity for the earth. The rough guesses were that mining 1 sq mile of the moon might yield 200# of He3 which should provide electricity for Detroit for a year. Thinking back on the idea, it might be too expensive for earth power but might be ideal for a spaceship, especially a large manned spaceship. Unlimited electrical power would make ion drive practical and the lack of a rrequirement for a heavy radiation shield would be a huge bonus. How well researched is the He3 reactor idea? Is there enough He3 on earth to build a working He3 reactor? Is the reactor laser activated? -- Free men own guns, slaves don't www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5357/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:51:53 -0500, Nick Hull wrote:
I was reading in Popular Mechanics about a harebrained scheme to mine the He3 from the moon to provide nuclear electricity for the earth. The rough guesses were that mining 1 sq mile of the moon might yield 200# of He3 which should provide electricity for Detroit for a year. Why not just build the power plant on the moon & feed the energy to Detroit with long wires? The wires could also help control the moon's orbit becuase I here it's drifting away from us? Sometimes the simpleest ideas are the best. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Burnham Treezdown wrote in
: On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:51:53 -0500, Nick Hull wrote: I was reading in Popular Mechanics about a harebrained scheme to mine the He3 from the moon to provide nuclear electricity for the earth. The rough guesses were that mining 1 sq mile of the moon might yield 200# of He3 which should provide electricity for Detroit for a year. Why not just build the power plant on the moon & feed the energy to Detroit with long wires? The wires could also help control the moon's orbit becuase I here it's drifting away from us? The power losses would be excessive, among other things. Ahem. Sometimes the simpleest ideas are the best. That's certainly simple-minded. --Damon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick Hull wrote:
How well researched is the He3 reactor idea? After 50 years, you can say it's *well* researched :-) Is there enough He3 on earth to build a working He3 reactor? Yes. To build 'a' reactor. And if it doesn't work you're in trouble :-) Is the reactor laser activated? No. Normal tokomak style reactor- you know, the one nobody can get to work after 50 years of research- only He3 needs it hotter, which makes it even more difficult... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|