New NASA Spaceplane concepts

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 15:45:47 GMT, Agent Blue wrote:

I vote for version #1 or #4.

http://tinyurl.com/lv3m

Let's see how long it takes for the project to either be scraped or
it's development timeframe be extended because funds will have to be
siphoned off to keep the shuttle flying and the space station in
orbit.

Botch
ROMAN: I tell you what I see when I look out there. I see the undeveloped resources of Minnesota, Northern Wisconsin, and Michigan. I see a syndicated development consortium exploiting over a billion and a half dollars in forest products. I see a paper mill and if the strategic metals are there, a mining operation. A greenbelt between the condos on the lake and a waste management facility focusing on the newest rage in toxic waste, medical refuse. Infected bandages, body parts, IV tubing, contaminated glassware, entrails,syringes, fluids, blood, low grade radioactive waste all safely contained sunken in the lake and sealed for centuries. Now I ask you what do you see?


CHET: I just see trees.

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 15:45:47 GMT, Agent Blue wrote:

I vote for version #1 or #4.

http://tinyurl.com/lv3m


Here's an irony.

The Shuttle replaced the Apollo capsule because of claims it would be:

FASTER, CHEAPER, BETTER.



The OSP (Apollo like) Capsule might replace the Shuttle because it is
claimed to be:

FASTER, SAFER, BETTER.





--
Rusty Barton - Antelope, California | Free! Free!
E-mail - | A Trip To Mars,
Visit my Titan I ICBM website at: | For 900 Empty Jars!
http://www.geocities.com/titan_1_missile | -Burma Shave-

"Agent Blue" wrote in message
...
I vote for version #1 or #4.

http://tinyurl.com/lv3m


Based on what education and thinking do you make this vote?