![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Russian News conference with the returning Soyuz crew has just
finished. I found some of the comments by Yuri Shargin interesting on his impressions during his short trip into space. Essentially, that the earth is a very small place, and how thin the atmosphere is, that makes life possible on the Earth. That many of the problems on Earth seemed much more insignificant, and how important it is to take care of the Earth for the future. He thinks that politicians should take a trip into space. How common are his thoughts about Earth after being viewed from orbit? I would think they are quite common. I also wonder how the experience has affected the lives of astronauts and cosmonauts in the years after having such an experience. Sending politicians into space for an attitude adjustment before they begin there term in elected office sounds like a good idea to me. It could be one of the best investments that taxpayers could make. Any thoughts? Craig Fink Badnarik for President |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Craig Fink" wrote Sending politicians into space for an attitude adjustment before they begin there term in elected office sounds like a good idea to me. It could be one of the best investments that taxpayers could make. It's also been suggested to bring world leaders to a Pacific atoll every ten years or so, and set off an H-bomb nearby so they can watch it, and then walk around the devastated area. Two politicians did go into orbit, without any apparent impact on their world views, and some men in orbit later became politicians, but both seemed to act in classic partisan style even so -- especially John Glenn. So we do have a non-zero sample size and it is not encouraging. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Jim Oberg" wrote: Two politicians did go into orbit, without any apparent impact on their world views, and some men in orbit later became politicians, but both seemed to act in classic partisan style even so -- especially John Glenn. So we do have a non-zero sample size and it is not encouraging. How do we know that without his experience in space, John Glenn wouldn't have been a Republican? After all, he his ex-military, which I think would tend to encourage Republican values. And views from space are generally described to elicit feelings of connectedness, fragily of the Earth, obligation to protect our one living world, etc., which might lead one to more Democratic values. All sheer speculation, of course, but it certainly doesn't provide the counterexample that a conservative Republican ex-astronaut would. Best, - Joe -- "Well, I think if you say you're going to do something and don't do it, that's trustworthiness." - George W. Bush [8/30/00] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
["Followup-To:" header set to sci.space.station.]
On 2004-10-26, Joe Strout wrote: After all, he his ex-military, which I think would tend to encourage Republican values. And views from space are generally described to elicit feelings of connectedness, fragily of the Earth, obligation to protect our one living world, etc., which might lead one to more Democratic values. Nice theory, but... All sheer speculation, of course, but it certainly doesn't provide the counterexample that a conservative Republican ex-astronaut would. The three Apollo-era ex-astronauts who went into politics were Republicans; Jack Swigert was elected to Congress from Colorado in '82, but died before taking office (having run in a Senate primary there in '78); Jack Schmitt was a Senator from New Mexico '77-83; Jack Lousma ran for the Senate in Michigan in '84. The two active politicians who flew were one R one D, but givne they were in politics first... -- -Andrew Gray |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:56:02 +0000, Jim Oberg wrote:
"Craig Fink" wrote Sending politicians into space for an attitude adjustment before they begin there term in elected office sounds like a good idea to me. It could be one of the best investments that taxpayers could make. It's also been suggested to bring world leaders to a Pacific atoll every ten years or so, and set off an H-bomb nearby so they can watch it, and then walk around the devastated area. lol, kind of like the difference between World Peace and Pieces. While not everybody may consider a trip to orbit a carrot, the H-bomb tour you described would most definitely have to be considered a stick. BTW, I believe that the site of the original atomic bomb test in New Mexico is now open one day a year for public tours. So we do have a non-zero sample size and it is not encouraging. The sample size of astronauts and cosmonauts is much larger and therefore statistically significant in determining changes in attitude. Craig Fink Badnarik for President |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Craig Fink wrote: So we do have a non-zero sample size and it is not encouraging. The sample size of astronauts and cosmonauts is much larger and therefore statistically significant in determining changes in attitude. However, despite a certain amount of hype, astronaut attitudes generally don't change a lot after flight. There are a few examples of guys who were really shaken up by it... but by and large, when you look at the details, those were guys who clearly had a shaking up coming anyway. It's an impressive, moving experience, but it doesn't make big changes. If spaceflight has any effect, it's to strengthen the way people already are. If that means shaky and unstable, they get more shaky and unstable and end up going through upheavals. But Pete Conrad and Neil Armstrong just got even more strongly Pete Conrad and Neil Armstrong. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry Spencer ) wrote:
: In article , : Craig Fink wrote: : So we do have a non-zero sample size and it is not encouraging. : : The sample size of astronauts and cosmonauts is much larger and therefore : statistically significant in determining changes in attitude. : However, despite a certain amount of hype, astronaut attitudes generally : don't change a lot after flight. There are a few examples of guys who : were really shaken up by it... but by and large, when you look at the : details, those were guys who clearly had a shaking up coming anyway. It's : an impressive, moving experience, but it doesn't make big changes. That's not what a shuttle mission specialist told us in a post shuttle mission presentation. She is an earth scientist and no doubt very pro-environment. All hype aside she claimed that even the most hardened miltary types get a new appreciation for our home planet once in space. : If spaceflight has any effect, it's to strengthen the way people already : are. If that means shaky and unstable, they get more shaky and unstable : and end up going through upheavals. But Pete Conrad and Neil Armstrong : just got even more strongly Pete Conrad and Neil Armstrong. Sounds like the outcome of the LSD experiments in CA in the 60s. Eric : -- : "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer : -- George Herbert | |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.space.policy Craig Fink wrote:
The Russian News conference with the returning Soyuz crew has just finished. I found some of the comments by Yuri Shargin interesting on his impressions during his short trip into space. Essentially, that the earth snip. Any thoughts? Issue them all with a bin-lid to sit on, and set off a few bombs underneath them. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
New Solar System Model that explains DW 2004 / Quaoar / Kuiper Belt and Pluto | hermesnines | Misc | 0 | February 24th 04 08:49 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |