A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MATTER AND ANTIMATTER



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 04, 11:00 PM
GRAVITYMECHANIC2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MATTER AND ANTIMATTER

MATTER AND ANTIMATTER
Copyright 1984 to 2003 Allen C. Goodrich

The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Astronomy (page 116) quotes
Stephen Hawking-
" Matter-antimatter pairs of particles are continually being produced
throughout space even in a perfect ' vacuum.'. This may be considered
a concequence of a variant of the Uncertainty Principle; large amounts
of energy are available for proportionally brief periods of time. This energy
may be sufficient to create an electron-positron pair,say, which then
annihilates almost immediately. The net effect is nothing produced from
nothing. In the extreme gravitational environment close to the
Schwarschild Radius of a black hole, one of the newly-created particles
may be dragged within the black hole. This time the net effect is a free
particle outside the hole. We cannot get something for nothing however,
and the black hole decreases in mass by an amount proportional to the
mass and energy of the free particle. In this way a black hole evaproates
away its rest mass energy.".

This theory requires that one of the particles , say the positron , is an
antimass which would subtract from the mass of the black hole and
result in an evaporation or decrease in the mass-energy of the black
hole. The first law of thermodynamics says that this is not possible.

In an expanding universe of constant total energy, as predicted by the
first law of thermodynamics, the expansion of the universe relative to
a mass, with the resulting decrease of potential energy, relative to that
mass, say, equal to the energy of a high energy gamma ray, could
result in the formation of an electron-positron pair of equal total
kinetic energy, if the mass provides the necessary environment.
This is necessary to conserve the total energy of the universe.
Although the positron is a positive charge and
the electron is a negative charge, their total energy is positive
and equal to the total energy of the high energy gamma ray that
they replaced. No reduction of the total energy of the black hole
could result from the acquisition of a positron.
( The first law of thermodyanmics so specifies.).

SEE
THE UNIVERSE- A GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF MASS ENERGY
SPACE TIME FRAME MECHANICS-APPEARING IN NEWSLETTER
"SPECTRUM" OF THE BUFFALO ASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION
INC. NOV.1996 TO FEB.1997
See http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechan.../business.html
FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechan...e/profile.html
TIDES AND GRAVITY MECHANICS
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechan...ge/resume.html
.. .







"

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beyond Linear Cosmology and Hypnotic Theology Yoda Misc 0 June 30th 04 07:33 PM
Breakthrough In Propulsion Physics. Abhi Astronomy Misc 146 December 30th 03 01:56 AM
Hi I'm new here bug SETI 38 December 25th 03 08:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.