![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it out yet, any one owns it? How good is it?
Any reviews? Thanks, Julius! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szaki" wrote in message news:lONXc.71463$Fg5.14954@attbi_s53... Is it out yet, any one owns it? How good is it? Any reviews? not yet seen in any dutch shops -- md |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it out yet, any one owns it? How good is it?
Any reviews? Hi: Yes. They are in the hands of users now. Initial reports are favorable. Much steadier and without the gearing problems that afflicted the 55s. Keep in mind that it'll be a few weeks before we have a full picture on these scopes, but it sounds good initially. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yes. They are in the hands of users now. Initial reports are favorable. Much steadier and without the gearing problems that afflicted the 55s. Keep in mind that it'll be a few weeks before we have a full picture on these scopes, but it sounds good initially. Here's part of a review of the 10" I saw just today... "The new larger finder is what is causing the scope to be unbalanced. You can not balance it with the finder on the OTA with only 30lbs of weight. Meade really let one slip there! WOW! So far I like it my optics are pretty dirty though, and I don't care for the tripod spreader as it does not stay against all three legs of the tripod. A better spreader is in order first of all. No noticable play in either axis and the visual dampening time is less than the 10" 55. The paint on the OTA appears to be much better, as it has a texture or orange peal look. Fit and finish are much better than the 55 series." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Check out the forums at www.cloudynights.com. They are shipping.
"Szaki" wrote in message news:lONXc.71463$Fg5.14954@attbi_s53... Is it out yet, any one owns it? How good is it? Any reviews? Thanks, Julius! -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Szaki wrote:
Is it out yet, any one owns it? How good is it? Any reviews? They look nice but I'm reading about a variety of minor problems with the first batch such as binding of the new bearings causing the mount to "shake" when it hits a tight spot, dirty correctors, not balancing, etc. Looks like they have some QC issues to work out, in the normal Meade way... (sending out the scopes and waiting for the calls). I'm sort of disapointed because I wanted one of these, but also relieved that I bought something else instead. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Szaki wrote:
Is it out yet, any one owns it? How good is it? Any reviews? Here's a decent review: http://www.neurohack.com/Astrophotog...irstLight.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Here's a decent review: http://www.neurohack.com/Astrophotog...irstLight.html Hi: Yep. Saw that one, and I believe it's probabbly more indicative of what the scopes are like than the person on the LXD75 list who is posting about bearings, the spreader, balance with the finder, etc. Now the person in question could _certainly_ have received a dog, no doubt about that. But from reading the posts where he's related the problems he's having, I'm not sure that it would be wise to put too much credance in what he's saying. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rod Mollise" wrote in message ... Yep. Saw that one, and I believe it's probabbly more indicative of what the scopes are like than the person on the LXD75 list who is posting about bearings, the spreader, balance with the finder, etc. Now the person in question could _certainly_ have received a dog, no doubt about that. Yup. It's possible; these are imports, after all. I don't think the majority of them have problems so far. My LXD75 SN-8 came out of the box with no apparent issues at all. It's been raining, but all indoor tests and inspections are encouraging. John C |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yup. It's possible; these are imports, after all. I don't think the majority of them have problems so far. My LXD75 SN-8 came out of the box with no apparent issues at all. It's been raining, but all indoor tests and inspections are encouraging. Hi: I would HOPE Meade has the sense not to let as many really bad ones get out the door as they did in the LXD55 debacle. Time will tell... Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ver. 4 of RTGUI - New Features for Celestron and Meade Scopes | Robert Sheaffer | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 1st 04 07:15 PM |
RTGUI Rel. 4 - New Features for Celestron & Meade Scopes | Robert Sheaffer | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 1st 04 07:13 PM |
Meade pricing in the UK...it is a scandal | Nick H | UK Astronomy | 16 | December 16th 03 10:28 PM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Bob Midiri | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 6th 03 06:13 PM |
In praise of Meade | Starstuffed | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | October 4th 03 08:20 PM |