![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi, This was my first session with my recently acquired Nikon D70 -- I finally made the jump to digital photography, with a Digital SLR that can be attached to the telescope as easily as any SLR film camera. I think it was pretty impressive (no, I'm not bragging or anything -- the kudos right now are for the camera! :-)). Besides being able to set it to ISO 1600, the fact that you can instantly check the results and repeat as needed does improve the quality of the results. Anyway, here are some pictures -- sorry that the comments are in Spanish; if you are really intrigued, I can translate them (but trust me, there is nothing particularly interesting in those comments :-)) http://www.mochima.com/personal/2004-04-24 (yeah ok, I'm weak -- I couldn't resist taking some images of those geese during their migrating flights; there were so many that afternoon!) Any feedback, comments, criticism will be highly appreciated. Cheers, Carlos -- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carlos:
For a first attempt I think those all look decent, congratulations. It looks like the camera offers good control over exposure, as with your Jupiter over/under exposures. What is the max resolution that is available on that camera? Were you using it for these images? By the way, your Spanish is pretty good;-) I understood all of it!! Clear skies, Francis Marion |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Francis Marion wrote:
Carlos: For a first attempt I think those all look decent, congratulations. Actually, it was not my first attempt at astrophotography -- it was the first one with a digital camera. I had taken a few other pictures using a film SLR camera, so I don't classify as an absolute beginner -- but of course, I'm still far (very far) from being able to claim that I'm an "expert" in astrophotography. Some of the successful (and semi-successful) pictures are at: http://www.mochima.com/personal (those are all taken with my film camera -- a Nikon F80; most of them using the telescope as the objective, except for the ones of the Milky Way) It looks like the camera offers good control over exposure, as with your Jupiter over/under exposures. Yes, the camera can be set anywhere between fully automatic (to the point that it decides to pop-up the flash automatically if it needs to) to fully manual. I used full manual for these. The only difficulty with it is that the small LCD display doesn't give you a lot of detail (for instance, I only could see Jupiter's moons with the 1-sec exposure -- several other pictures did show them, but I wasn't seeing them on the LCD display). Still, it is much better than having to guess, as it is the case when shooting on film. What is the max resolution that is available on that camera? Were you using it for these images? It has a nice 3000 x 2000 resolution (6 megapixels). Yes, I was at maximum resolution; with "High quality" JPEG compression, normal images are about 2.5 Mbytes; but these, since 99.9% of the image is just black, the files are usually below 200k or 300k By the way, your Spanish is pretty good;-) I understood all of it!! ;-) Well, it's good news that after 12 years living in Canada, the area of my brain in charge of mother language is still operating properly :-) Cheers, Carlos -- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() For a first attempt I think those all look decent, congratulations. Actually, it was not my first attempt at astrophotography -- it was the first one with a digital camera. That's what I meant, with that new camera. I had taken a few other pictures using a film SLR camera, so I don't classify as an absolute beginner -- but of course, I'm still far (very far) from being able to claim that I'm an "expert" in astrophotography. Some of the successful (and semi-successful) pictures are at: http://www.mochima.com/personal Several excellent images. What is the max resolution that is available on that camera? Were you using it for these images? It has a nice 3000 x 2000 resolution (6 megapixels). Yes, I was at maximum resolution; with "High quality" JPEG compression, normal images are about 2.5 Mbytes; but these, since 99.9% of the image is just black, the files are usually below 200k or 300k 6 megapixels? I'm way behind the learning curve when it comes to the latest and the greatest!! My 3 year old Sony FD-97 is just over 1 megapixel!! ;-) Technology sure does get old fast around here!! By the way, your Spanish is pretty good;-) I understood all of it!! ;-) Well, it's good news that after 12 years living in Canada, the area of my brain in charge of mother language is still operating properly :-) Looks like your from Spain? My family immigrated from Northern Spain to New Mexico about 1697. We've stayed in the same general area since then. Good luck with your new toy, Francis Marion |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fresh Cassini Pictures Show Majesty of Saturn's Rings | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 2 | July 2nd 04 04:50 AM |
Oct 30 Aurora Pictures from PA! | Ted A. Nichols II | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 31st 03 07:02 PM |
Apollo pictures taken from the TV screen | Doug... | History | 0 | August 26th 03 08:30 AM |
Pictures of Mars (digital camera) | Phil Wheeler | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | August 15th 03 05:10 AM |