Hagar played again

Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?

On Saturday, April 8, 2017 at 3:47:34 PM UTC-7, Notroll2016 wrote:
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?

no Hillary dropped off old gas containers to say, lookkie lookie, chem canisters, so Trump bombed them to help cover up Crookedhillary insatiable behavior to do crooked and insanoid, non-thought-out actions, all to benefit her bank accounts , off shore.

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make repairs problematical.

Richard A. wrote:
Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as
the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and
support buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway
unusable for a while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are
mines which can make repairs problematical.








What is being overlooked is the possibility that this was a message to the
Chinese and mostly North Korea.
That Trump can and will take action if he's pushed.

Had hitlery been in the white house, you know she would have launched the
nukes already.
Third debate, she was already salivating at the chance of slamming her hand
down on that big red button.

Blast says
- show quoted text -
What is being overlooked is the possibility that this was a message to the
Chinese and mostly North Korea.
That Trump can and will take action if he's pushed.
-----------

Military action against North Korea would not be as easy as an attack against Syria. We would risk counter attacks against not only US forces stationed along the border but the 10 million civilian lives in Seoul. Even without using nukes, North Korea has field artillery which is already aimed at these targets.

The only way to successfully engage the North would be a massive strike targeting their command and control infrastructure, radar and targeting, and then artillery and nuclear launch sites. This would be very very difficult to do without a massive build up of air and sea assets which would obviously be noted by the North. I'm talking thousands of cruise missiles and stealth aircraft. Followed up with B52s out of Guam as well as standard rockets and artillery from our ground forces. Difficult to pull that off

Richard A. wrote:
Blast says
- show quoted text -
What is being overlooked is the possibility that this was a message to
the
Chinese and mostly North Korea.
That Trump can and will take action if he's pushed.
-----------

Military action against North Korea would not be as easy as an attack
against Syria. We would risk counter attacks against not only US forces
stationed along the border but the 10 million civilian lives in Seoul.
Even without using nukes, North Korea has field artillery which is
already aimed at these targets.

The only way to successfully engage the North would be a massive strike
targeting their command and control infrastructure, radar and
targeting, and then artillery and nuclear launch sites. This would be
very very difficult to do without a massive build up of air and sea
assets which would obviously be noted by the North. I'm talking
thousands of cruise missiles and stealth aircraft. Followed up with
B52s out of Guam as well as standard rockets and artillery from our
ground forces. Difficult to pull that off







Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
I'm still not with the attack in Syria, but I'm just trying to hope that is
was a "necessary" option, as Trump is really losing a lot of my and others
support.
Still far better than had hitlery been in there, and would have surely
launced us into WW3 already.

"Richard A." wrote in message
...

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support
buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a
while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make
repairs problematical.


*** You do realize that noTroll is a total moron and no explanation
on Earth would make sense to him, in particular the more subtle
nuances of the action directed at North Korea and China.
Let it suffice to say I'd rather see the money spent on Tomahawk
missiles, than on illegal Aliens and Democrat deadbeats.

"Hägar" wrote in message
...



"Richard A." wrote in message
...

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support
buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a
while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make
repairs problematical.


*** You do realize that noTroll is a total moron and no explanation
on Earth would make sense to him, in particular the more subtle
nuances of the action directed at North Korea and China.
Let it suffice to say I'd rather see the money spent on Tomahawk
missiles, than on illegal Aliens and Democrat deadbeats.

***At best this was a lame attempt to distract us from Trump's problems.
Enough to fool you.

"Notroll2016" wrote in message news
"Hägar" wrote in message
...

"Richard A." wrote in message
...

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support
buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a
while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make
repairs problematical.


*** You do realize that noTroll is a total moron and no explanation
on Earth would make sense to him, in particular the more subtle
nuances of the action directed at North Korea and China.
Let it suffice to say I'd rather see the money spent on Tomahawk
missiles, than on illegal Aliens and Democrat deadbeats.

***At best this was a lame attempt to distract us from Trump's problems.
Enough to fool you.


Other than Liberal hysteria, Trump has no problems. He laughs at
you ass clowns and everything he does comes up roses. For example,
he just destroyed the "Putin is his best Buddy" talking points of the
Liberal Loons, by lobbing Tomahawks at their puppet in Syria. You
dip**** just haven't caught on yet, as usual.

"Hägar" wrote in message
...

"Notroll2016" wrote in message news
"Hägar" wrote in message
...

"Richard A." wrote in message
...

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support
buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a
while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make
repairs problematical.


*** You do realize that noTroll is a total moron and no explanation
on Earth would make sense to him, in particular the more subtle
nuances of the action directed at North Korea and China.
Let it suffice to say I'd rather see the money spent on Tomahawk
missiles, than on illegal Aliens and Democrat deadbeats.

***At best this was a lame attempt to distract us from Trump's problems.
Enough to fool you.


Other than Liberal hysteria, Trump has no problems. He laughs at
you ass clowns and everything he does comes up roses. For example,
he just destroyed the "Putin is his best Buddy" talking points of the
Liberal Loons, by lobbing Tomahawks at their puppet in Syria. You
dip**** just haven't caught on yet, as usual.

***************
Silly boi. You're a sucker.