![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 7:59:04 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
On 2/11/2015 10:39 AM, Sam Wormley wrote: There are NOT 11 billion year old planets orbiting 7 billion year old stars. There could be tho. Nothing precludes a star from capturing an ancient planet. Ofc this is not what Bert was talking about but who cares? -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224 Sam Massive stars live only a few million years begs this question. How long did gravity using its compression force to give them this great mass density? Where did all the stuff to make gravity's force come from and how long did it take to decide where a good spot would be to build a great dense massive star.It had to do it very fast for 13.7 billion years to be reality. My 22 billion goes with good reasoning. I know the universe was smaller more condensed. That is true,but still my Time lapse will be excepted in thefuture TreBert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kepler discovered a system of 11-billion-year-old planets | Arc Michael | Misc | 1 | February 15th 15 01:30 AM |
Kepler discovered a system of 11-billion-year-old planets | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 12th 15 06:35 PM |
Kepler discovered a system of 11-billion-year-old planets | palsing[_2_] | Misc | 1 | February 12th 15 04:26 AM |
Exoplanet Kepler-76b: discovered through effects predicted by Einstein'sSTR | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 5 | May 18th 13 09:30 AM |
Stuff that the Kepler telescope has discovered besides planets | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 21st 11 05:33 AM |