![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was out grilling some hot dogs (38 degrees isn't so cold, is it?), and
glanced up to see how the sky was looking. After a few seconds, having no dark adaption at all, I caught a fuzziness near the zenith. After I turned the outside light off, it was even more prominent. It's an elongated fuzzy patch in my 10x50's, brighter than any galaxy I've seen even through my telescope. In fact, it looks to the naked eye a bit like M31 looks in my 8" telescope. There's solid cloud cover right now, so I can't see it anymore. There wasn't a whole lot of clear sky when I first saw it, so the only location I can come up with is to roughly follow a line from Epsilon Cas through Gamma Cas, for a few tens of degrees. It was near the zenith at around 21:00 EDT at -74:47W and 41:18N. I see nothing in the charts to explain it. I estimate its size to be a couple degrees in length, and maybe half a degree in width. Anyone else see this thing? -- - Mike Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The position and appearance indicate that what you saw is M31. You've just
given an excellent description of the way M31 looks to the naked eye and in binoculars. In a really clear sky, it jumps out at you. In your telescope, you usually see only the central core, which is much smaller. The object you describe -- about 0.5 x 2 degrees -- is just what the relatively bright part of M31 looks like in binoculars. (The fainter parts may extend out to more like 1 x 4 degrees.) And M31 was only 5 degrees from the zenith at the time and place you describe. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 00:17:48 -0400, Michael A. Covington wrote:
The position and appearance indicate that what you saw is M31. You've just given an excellent description of the way M31 looks to the naked eye and in binoculars. In a really clear sky, it jumps out at you. In your telescope, you usually see only the central core, which is much smaller. The object you describe -- about 0.5 x 2 degrees -- is just what the relatively bright part of M31 looks like in binoculars. (The fainter parts may extend out to more like 1 x 4 degrees.) And M31 was only 5 degrees from the zenith at the time and place you describe. That was my first impression of what it must be, but it was far too bright, and not in the right position in relation to Cassiopeia. But I'm not positive, because most stars weren't visible, and the angles were a bit awkward. If it was M31, I'll be able to tell if there's a cloudless night in the next few days. Otherwise, I'll remain stumped. -- - Mike Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aurora? Cloud?
Regards, Bill Ferris "Cosmic Voyage: The Online Resource for Amateur Astronomers" URL: http://www.cosmic-voyage.net ============= Email: Remove "ic" from .comic above to respond |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Oct 2003 15:46:37 GMT, Bill Ferris wrote:
Aurora? Cloud? There's no trace of it tonight, and I can now conclude that it was definitely not M31 (wrong position, very much wrong brightness). It was perhaps a very small and very still noctilucent cloud. -- - Mike Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was checking out m31 tonight also, in these polluted skies between
baltimore and d.c. But alas I could not see it via the naked eye, just by starhopping. In my 8" newtonian it is still an elongated fuzzy, I do not see a central core. It seems to be close to the same view as in my 15x70 binocular's, an elongated fuzzy. Too much light pollution I guess. I'm checking out the light pollution map for my area, it looks like I fall in the bortle scale of 7-less than 100 stars visibe, I'm looking for a bortle scale of at least 4-with some milkyway structure.Maybe only 15-20 miles away, it would be nice if some smaller town locations were indicated, for approximate location of the close good viewing spots. "Michael A. Covington" wrote in message ... The position and appearance indicate that what you saw is M31. You've just given an excellent description of the way M31 looks to the naked eye and in binoculars. In a really clear sky, it jumps out at you. In your telescope, you usually see only the central core, which is much smaller. The object you describe -- about 0.5 x 2 degrees -- is just what the relatively bright part of M31 looks like in binoculars. (The fainter parts may extend out to more like 1 x 4 degrees.) And M31 was only 5 degrees from the zenith at the time and place you describe. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
It could be that you glimpsed the North American Nebula (in the constellation of Cygnus) with a total magnitude of 4.0. This nebula, NGC7000 lies roughly in the area you describe and could have been visible to your naked eye given dark enough skies and good enough seeing. Martin |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Starstuffed" wrote in message ink.net... Mike, It could be that you glimpsed the North American Nebula (in the constellation of Cygnus) with a total magnitude of 4.0. This nebula, NGC7000 lies roughly in the area you describe and could have been visible to your naked eye given dark enough skies and good enough seeing. Martin I believe Mike and I live in the same town, and the light pollution here always sucks a lemon. Only time we get dark skies here is during a general blackout...and they only come during periods of full moon. Al |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Al" wrote in message news ![]() I believe Mike and I live in the same town, and the light pollution here always sucks a lemon. Only time we get dark skies here is during a general blackout...and they only come during periods of full moon. Thanks for the info. That pretty much rules out NGC7000. I'll go back to sleep now, Martin |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:53:40 GMT, Al wrote:
"Starstuffed" wrote in message link.net... Mike, It could be that you glimpsed the North American Nebula (in the constellation of Cygnus) with a total magnitude of 4.0. This nebula, NGC7000 lies roughly in the area you describe and could have been visible to your naked eye given dark enough skies and good enough seeing. I believe Mike and I live in the same town, and the light pollution here always sucks a lemon. Only time we get dark skies here is during a general blackout...and they only come during periods of full moon. I used to live in central NJ, but I now live in northwest NJ, where light pollution is very slight. ZLM is at least 6.0. Whatever I saw, it was not any known DSO for certain. It was far too bright. I can only guess it was a small noctilucent cloud, since there's no trace of anything like it tonight. -- - Mike Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CalStar Ver. 4.0 An observing report. ( Long ) | Rashad Al-Mansour | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 4th 03 01:53 AM |
[obs] Lucy looks Skywards 23/09/2003 | Morgoth | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 29th 03 02:39 AM |
New Image of Comet Halley in the Cold | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 2nd 03 04:31 PM |
Deimos/Phobos Tonight | Richard DeLuca | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 20th 03 02:25 AM |