A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mir Shall Be Avenged!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 27th 11, 05:49 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Quadibloc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,018
Default Mir Shall Be Avenged!

At least that is how Pat Flannery might spin the following news item:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...e115a20f82.841

where Russia, rather than the United States, somehow ends up being the
first to announce the eventual watery grave of the ISS in 2020.

Although presumably it will burn up to tiny fragments on the way in.

John Savard
  #2  
Old July 27th 11, 07:43 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default Mir Shall Be Avenged!

On Jul 27, 12:49*pm, Quadibloc wrote:
At least that is how Pat Flannery might spin the following news item:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...Vtj_n_MG8_1UfG...

where Russia, rather than the United States, somehow ends up being the
first to announce the eventual watery grave of the ISS in 2020.

Although presumably it will burn up to tiny fragments on the way in.

John Savard


it would be far better to send ISS into a heliospheric orbit left for
history......
  #3  
Old July 28th 11, 02:08 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default Mir Shall Be Avenged!

In article
,
bob haller wrote:

On Jul 27, 12:49*pm, Quadibloc wrote:
At least that is how Pat Flannery might spin the following news item:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...Vtj_n_MG8_1UfG...

where Russia, rather than the United States, somehow ends up being the
first to announce the eventual watery grave of the ISS in 2020.

Although presumably it will burn up to tiny fragments on the way in.

John Savard


it would be far better to send ISS into a heliospheric orbit left for
history......


If you mean "heliocentric" orbit, it takes a lot of delta-V to get it
there, plus, I don't think the ISS could take the acceleration without
breaking up.
  #4  
Old July 28th 11, 07:35 AM posted to sci.space.policy
snidely
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,303
Default Mir Shall Be Avenged!

Orval Fairbairn scribbled something like ...

If you mean "heliocentric" orbit, it takes a lot of delta-V to get it
there, plus, I don't think the ISS could take the acceleration without
breaking up.


To do with chemical rockets would be difficult for that reason, but if you
have the time to use on ion drive, they've got the solar panels to power
it.

/dps
  #5  
Old July 28th 11, 03:18 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 278
Default Mir Shall Be Avenged!


"Quadibloc" wrote in message
...
At least that is how Pat Flannery might spin the following news item:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...e115a20f82.841

where Russia, rather than the United States, somehow ends up being the
first to announce the eventual watery grave of the ISS in 2020.

Although presumably it will burn up to tiny fragments on the way in.



The ruskies have an inferiority complex.



John Savard



  #6  
Old July 28th 11, 04:35 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Waimate01
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Mir Shall Be Avenged!


"Jonathan" wrote in message

The ruskies have an inferiority complex.


They also have a manned space capability.


  #7  
Old July 29th 11, 10:48 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Dr J R Stockton[_122_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Mir Shall Be Avenged!

In sci.space.policy message 746c6fc0-a6a4-429c-849b-041cb049215e@m3g200
0pre.googlegroups.com, Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:49:08, Quadibloc
posted:

At least that is how Pat Flannery might spin the following news item:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...j_n_MG8_1UfGh8
so3JSAIQ?docId=CNG.feed6fbd2ac38e43959fb0e115a20f 82.841

where Russia, rather than the United States, somehow ends up being the
first to announce the eventual watery grave of the ISS in 2020.


What the Russian ACTUALLY said was that the present agreement for the
use of ISS expires in 2020, and that at the end of its life ISS would be
splashed.

He did not say that it would be splashed in 2020.

His words were compatible with the possibility of the extension of the
agreement to operate.

AIUI.

Remember : the US press can, after a fashion, write; but there is little
evidence that itt is much good at reading.

--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms and links;
Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.