![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am looking for Web sites of university or college where he studied
astronomy. Regards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/18/10 9:09 AM, BluStar wrote:
I am looking for Web sites of university or college where he studied astronomy. Regards In 1491, Copernicus was sent off to Cracow University, where he pursued a course of general studies for four years before traveling to Italy to study law and medicine, as was common practice among Polish elites at the time. While studying at the University of Bologna (where he would eventually become a professor of astronomy) Copernicus boarded at the home of Domenico Maria de Novara, the renowned mathematician of whom Copernicus would ultimately become a disciple. Novara was a critic of Ptolomy, whose second-century astronomy he regarded with skepticism. In november of 1500, Copernicus observed a lunar eclipse in Rome. Although he spent the next few years in Italy studying medicine, he never lost his passion for astronomy. After receiving a degree of Doctor of Canon Law, Copernicus practiced medicine at the episcopal court of Keilsberg, where his uncle lived. Royalty and high clergy requested his medical services, but Copernicus spent most of his time in service of the poor. In 1503, he returned to Poland and moved into his uncle's bishopric place in Lidzbark Warmiknsky. There he tended to administrative matters of the diocese, as well as serving as an advisor to his uncle. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 5:46*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/18/10 9:09 AM, BluStar wrote: I am looking for Web sites of university or college where he studied astronomy. Regards * * In 1491, Copernicus was sent off to Cracow University, where he * * pursued a course of general studies for four years before * * traveling to Italy to study law and medicine, as was common * * practice among Polish elites at the time. * * While studying at the University of Bologna (where he would * * eventually become a professor of astronomy) Copernicus boarded * * at the home of Domenico Maria de Novara, the renowned * * mathematician of whom Copernicus would ultimately become a * * disciple. Novara was a critic of Ptolomy, whose second-century * * astronomy he regarded with skepticism. * * In november of 1500, Copernicus observed a lunar eclipse in * * Rome. Although he spent the next few years in Italy studying * * medicine, he never lost his passion for astronomy. * * After receiving a degree of Doctor of Canon Law, Copernicus * * practiced medicine at the episcopal court of Keilsberg, where * * his uncle lived. Royalty and high clergy requested his medical * * services, but Copernicus spent most of his time in service of * * the poor. * * In 1503, he returned to Poland and moved into his uncle's * * bishopric place in *Lidzbark Warmiknsky. There he tended to * * administrative matters of the diocese, as well as serving as an * * advisor to his uncle. I know of Copernicus through the technical details of planetary dynamics which you and the rest of the empiricists refuse to accept even when time lapse footage of the Earth overtaking Jupiter and Saturn consigns the stupid perspective of Newton, in regards to apparent retrogrades and their resolution, to nothing more than a mathematician trying to appear like an astronomer - http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap011220.html I could understand the reasons why Newton chose to look at retrogrades from the predicting/modelling agenda but it will always amount to a distortion that is effectively worthless,be the schem be ever so elaborate - " For to the earth planetary motions appear sometimes direct, sometimes stationary, nay, and sometimes retrograde. But from the sun they are always seen direct," Newton That statement by the mathematician Newton is actually forgivable ,given that it looks right even though it isn't,what is unconscionable is that presently,with the aid of modern imaging,not a single person has affirmed that Copernicus got retrogrades and their resolution right leaving Newton's dumb view nowhere.This is why I can say with certainty that people must absolutely hate astronomy for no intelligent person could watch this intellectual holocaust happen. There you go Sam,work gets done whether people are responsive or not, and only out generation will be hated if it does not correct what needs to be corrected and move on to productive investigations. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 11:42*am, oriel36 tells us that
Newton said: " For to the earth planetary motions appear sometimes direct, sometimes stationary, nay, and sometimes retrograde. But from the sun they are always seen direct," Newton After all these years you still continue to claim that there is something wrong with this statement, but there isn't. All Newton is saying is that from the surface of the earth we see retrograde motion (and we all know why this is true, even you know this). From the earth the planets sometimes appear to move in retrograde among the stars, for a short time they appear to stand still, and the rest of the time they move prograde, just like they do in that APOD video you like to show, no problem. Newton knew this as well as you or I do, he knew that this motion was only *apparent* from earth's surface because of the relative speeds of the bodies involved as each travels around the sun at different rates. Newton just took his observations one step further, and declared that if one were to be standing on the sun (and we all know this is impossible, but it is, after all, only a mind experiment) that one would not see any apparent retrograde, because from the sun there is no relative motion, the sun will always stand still with respect to the planets, they all go around the sun in direct motion, and never appear to go backwards. What the heck is so hard to understand about this? Little kids can be taught this with relative ease. For once, learn something. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 10:46*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/18/10 9:09 AM, BluStar wrote: I am looking for Web sites of university or college where he studied astronomy. * * In 1491, Copernicus was sent off to Cracow University, where he * * pursued a course of general studies for four years before * * traveling to Italy to study law and medicine, as was common * * practice among Polish elites at the time. * * While studying at the University of Bologna (where he would * * eventually become a professor of astronomy) Query: on what basis was "he" evaluated as Nicolaus Copernicus? The posting does not appear to contain sufficient data for the pronoun to be assigned a referent. John Savard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 7:48*pm, Quadibloc wrote:
On Mar 18, 10:46*am, Sam Wormley wrote: On 3/18/10 9:09 AM, BluStar wrote: I am looking for Web sites of university or college where he studied astronomy. * * In 1491, Copernicus was sent off to Cracow University, where he * * pursued a course of general studies for four years before * * traveling to Italy to study law and medicine, as was common * * practice among Polish elites at the time. * * While studying at the University of Bologna (where he would * * eventually become a professor of astronomy) Query: on what basis was "he" evaluated as Nicolaus Copernicus? The posting does not appear to contain sufficient data for the pronoun to be assigned a referent. Correct. As can be gleaned by the recent posting history of the wormbot, postings are randomized by the bot. It's actually a simple function call: #define _SAA "sci.astro.amateur" post(Usenet, _SAA, pull(asshole(random())); |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Web sites of university | BluStar | Astronomy Misc | 5 | March 19th 10 09:07 AM |
Landing Sites | Greg D. Moore \(Strider\) | Space Shuttle | 2 | December 21st 06 12:04 PM |
Sites | Double-A | Misc | 1 | July 12th 05 11:43 AM |
Are there any "live" sites that.... | DoubleEntendre | Misc | 2 | December 26th 04 06:46 AM |
Essential Web Sites | Earl Colby Pottinger | Space Science Misc | 7 | November 4th 03 04:54 AM |