A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

IU



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 23rd 10, 02:17 AM posted to sci.space.history
David Lesher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 198
Default IU

A friend gave me the Haynes manual for Xmas, and in reading it [&
looking at the pictures...] I've realized I know diddly about the IU,
besides IBM made it.

I know it saved the bacon when lighting hit the launching stack, but
for example, how did it navigate? I see it had its own radar; I'm
guessing it interrogated ground transponders that let it calculate its
position to compare with the INS. Correct?



--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
  #2  
Old February 23rd 10, 02:34 AM posted to sci.space.history
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,089
Default IU

David Lesher wrote:
A friend gave me the Haynes manual for Xmas, and in reading it [&
looking at the pictures...] I've realized I know diddly about the IU,
besides IBM made it.

I know it saved the bacon when lighting hit the launching stack, but
for example, how did it navigate? I see it had its own radar; I'm
guessing it interrogated ground transponders that let it calculate its
position to compare with the INS. Correct?


Not correct. It had an inertial platform (ST-124) and used inertial
navigation. There was no "external" source of position; the LVDC
computed position and velocity by integrating the acceleration from the
ST-124.
  #3  
Old February 23rd 10, 03:02 AM posted to sci.space.history
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,089
Default IU

Jorge R. Frank wrote:
David Lesher wrote:
A friend gave me the Haynes manual for Xmas, and in reading it [&
looking at the pictures...] I've realized I know diddly about the IU,
besides IBM made it.

I know it saved the bacon when lighting hit the launching stack, but
for example, how did it navigate? I see it had its own radar; I'm
guessing it interrogated ground transponders that let it calculate its
position to compare with the INS. Correct?


Not correct. It had an inertial platform (ST-124) and used inertial
navigation. There was no "external" source of position; the LVDC
computed position and velocity by integrating the acceleration from the
ST-124.


I'll add (of course) that the ground did perform tracking of the S-V and
could uplink a new state vector to the IU if the inertial navigation
system got too far off.
  #4  
Old February 23rd 10, 05:06 AM posted to sci.space.history
David Lesher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 198
Default IU

"Jorge R. Frank" writes:

I know it saved the bacon when lighting hit the launching stack, but
for example, how did it navigate? I see it had its own radar; I'm
guessing it interrogated ground transponders that let it calculate its
position to compare with the INS. Correct?


Not correct. It had an inertial platform (ST-124) and used inertial
navigation. There was no "external" source of position; the LVDC
computed position and velocity by integrating the acceleration from the
ST-124.


I'll add (of course) that the ground did perform tracking of the S-V and
could uplink a new state vector to the IU if the inertial navigation
system got too far off.


So what did it use the radar for?


--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
  #5  
Old February 24th 10, 12:02 AM posted to sci.space.history
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,089
Default IU

David Lesher wrote:
"Jorge R. Frank" writes:

I know it saved the bacon when lighting hit the launching stack, but
for example, how did it navigate? I see it had its own radar; I'm
guessing it interrogated ground transponders that let it calculate its
position to compare with the INS. Correct?
Not correct. It had an inertial platform (ST-124) and used inertial
navigation. There was no "external" source of position; the LVDC
computed position and velocity by integrating the acceleration from the
ST-124.


I'll add (of course) that the ground did perform tracking of the S-V and
could uplink a new state vector to the IU if the inertial navigation
system got too far off.


So what did it use the radar for?


Depends on what you mean by "it". The Saturn V did not have radar. The
LM did (both a rendezvous radar and a landing radar), but of course
these could not be used during launch since the LM was stowed in the SLA
and powered down.
  #6  
Old February 24th 10, 09:20 AM posted to sci.space.history
David Lesher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 198
Default IU

"Jorge R. Frank" writes:


Depends on what you mean by "it". The Saturn V did not have
radar. The LM did (both a rendezvous radar and a landing
radar), but of course these could not be used during launch
since the LM was stowed in the SLA and powered down.


I knwo of those two; but picture MSFC 68-IND-1200-24 A
as seen on page 55 of Haynes shows "C band Radar" in the
IU, next to the air supply tank.

--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.