![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What's the equation for the length of day, as a function of latitude and calendar date? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 1919 Eclipse wrote:
What's the equation for the length of day, as a function of latitude and calendar date? You can calculate the local times of sunrise and sunset for a given date, then take the difference between the two. Keep in mind that there are different definitions for sunrise and sunset for different disciplines. Take a look at this: http://williams.best.vwh.net/sunrise..._algorithm.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/14/10 7:16 AM, The 1919 Eclipse wrote:
What's the equation for the length of day, as a function of latitude and calendar date? There's an app for that. http://emeraldsequoia.com/h/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 14, 8:16*am, The 1919 Eclipse
wrote: What's the equation for the length of day, as a function of latitude and calendar date? The length of day also varies with the date: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tadchem wrote:
On Jan 14, 8:16 am, The 1919 Eclipse wrote: What's the equation for the length of day, as a function of latitude and calendar date? You would have to look up the variation of solar declination over the course of a year. Any formula for this would involve orbital eccentricity and axial tilt, and take leap years into account. Given the declination (N or S of the celestial equator) from an almanac or formula, the hour angle H of rising or setting at some latitude (N +; S -) is cos H = -tan (lat) tan (dec) If cos H comes out with absolute value greater than unity, the sun is circumpolar and either doesn't rise or doesn't set, depending on circumstances. Convert answer from radians to hours and multiply by two for total length of a day. The above does not take into account horizontal refraction. This typically lengthens the day by 8 minutes or more. Does the OP need this refinement? The length of day also varies with the date: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time Tom Davidson Richmond, VA Equation of Time describes the varying difference between apparent noon and mean noon (or clock noon) caused by the Earth's axial inclination and orbital eccentricity. The Sun transits earlier or later than noon as read by a clock. The length of the day is unaffected. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.astro message , Tue, 19
Jan 2010 09:40:35, Mike Dworetsky posted: Equation of Time describes the varying difference between apparent noon and mean noon (or clock noon) caused by the Earth's axial inclination and orbital eccentricity. The Sun transits earlier or later than noon as read by a clock. The length of the day is unaffected. Only approximately. The length of the solar day must be a constant plus the derivative of the equation of time, giving an overall variation of a fraction of a minute. -- (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links; Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc. No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr J R Stockton wrote:
In sci.astro message , Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:40:35, Mike Dworetsky posted: Equation of Time describes the varying difference between apparent noon and mean noon (or clock noon) caused by the Earth's axial inclination and orbital eccentricity. The Sun transits earlier or later than noon as read by a clock. The length of the day is unaffected. Only approximately. The length of the solar day must be a constant plus the derivative of the equation of time, giving an overall variation of a fraction of a minute. True, but usually this is no more than a few seconds a day, and I didn't want to get into a long explanation. Also, there are other factors that can change the length such as atmospheric conditions, and they cannot be predicted by calculation in advance. There are good reasons why the Almanacs only give sunrise and sunset to one-minute precision. (I was at the Observatory on La Palma some years ago when one of the astronomers was actually doing a comparison of Almanac Office predictions of local sunset vs observations, and the variations were of order +/- 30 sec. Definition used was upper limb on the horizon.) -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.astro message , Fri, 22
Jan 2010 07:25:17, Mike Dworetsky posted: Dr J R Stockton wrote: In sci.astro message , Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:40:35, Mike Dworetsky posted: Equation of Time describes the varying difference between apparent noon and mean noon (or clock noon) caused by the Earth's axial inclination and orbital eccentricity. The Sun transits earlier or later than noon as read by a clock. The length of the day is unaffected. Only approximately. The length of the solar day must be a constant plus the derivative of the equation of time, giving an overall variation of a fraction of a minute. True, but usually this is no more than a few seconds a day, and I didn't want to get into a long explanation. Also, there are other factors that can change the length such as atmospheric conditions, and they cannot be predicted by calculation in advance. There are good reasons why the Almanacs only give sunrise and sunset to one-minute precision. I assume the atmospheric effects are almost entirely on the deflection of the sunlight, and only slightly on the actual rotation of the Earth. It should be possible to predict local noon much more exactly. No chance recently of making any such observations here. -- (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike v6.05. Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms PAS EXE etc : URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/ - see 00index.htm Dates - miscdate.htm estrdate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 19, 4:40*am, "Mike Dworetsky"
wrote: tadchem wrote: On Jan 14, 8:16 am, The 1919 Eclipse wrote: What's the equation for the length of day, as a function of latitude and calendar date? You would have to look up the variation of solar declination over the course of a year. *Any formula for this would involve orbital eccentricity and axial tilt, and take leap years into account. Given the declination (N or S of the celestial equator) from an almanac or formula, the hour angle H of rising or setting at some latitude (N +; S -) is cos H = -tan (lat) tan (dec) If cos H comes out with absolute value greater than unity, the sun is circumpolar and either doesn't rise or doesn't set, depending on circumstances. *Convert answer from radians to hours and multiply by two for total length of a day. The above does not take into account horizontal refraction. *This typically lengthens the day by 8 minutes or more. *Does the OP need this refinement? The length of day also varies with the date: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time Tom Davidson Richmond, VA Equation of Time describes the varying difference between apparent noon and mean noon (or clock noon) caused by the Earth's axial inclination and orbital eccentricity. *The Sun transits earlier or later than noon as read by a clock. *The length of the day is unaffected. It is *precisely* the difference between "apparent noon" and "mean noon" (as defined by the "mean solar day" of exactly 24 hours) that defines the variation in the length of day, as the OP literally requested. This is where the analemma fits into the calculations. It is possible that the OP was *actually* concerned with the variation in the length of the daylight hours, as this would be very dependent on the latitude and the orientation of the earth's axis relative to the sun, its exact degree of tilt, the eccentricity of earth's orbit, the longitude of perihelion, and other orbital elements. The humidity of the air towards the sun at sunrise and sunset would also affect the refractive index of the air, and thus the refraction of the apparent sun. This latter effect alone has been shown to influence the times of sunset and sunrise by several minutes. Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
quick question | Doghouse Reilly | Astronomy Misc | 5 | June 11th 09 09:04 PM |
One quick question | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 24th 06 11:09 AM |
Quick question | Paul Schofield | SETI | 5 | November 30th 05 11:47 PM |
quick question | David Oatley | Misc | 1 | July 28th 04 07:33 PM |
Quick Question | Frank Reichenbacher | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 30th 03 03:36 PM |