![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon
further away.? We have to protect high waves from destroying cities like NYC London etc. We could do it. Bert PS Think New Orleans |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 13, 9:43*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon further away.? *We have to protect high waves from destroying cities like NYC London etc. We could do it. *Bert *PS Think New Orleans Yes, such as moving our Selene/moon out to Earth L1 would accomplish moderating those pesky ocean tides to something worth a little less than half of what we currently have to deal with, and we'd also get that nifty and badly needed 3.03.5% spot of shade to boot. ~ BG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon further away.? We have to protect high waves from destroying cities like NYC London etc. We could do it. Bert PS Think New Orleans Yeah, it would only take what? The energy of a quadrillion nuclear bombs to move the moon 1m/s? The need is not there. Why bother? If we have to move a few cities that is the consequence of living on a mutable planet. Remember, a large quantity of the United States was under water at one point in time, recently. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 13, 10:39*am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in ... What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon further away.? *We have to protect high waves from destroying cities like NYC London etc. We could do it. *Bert *PS Think New Orleans Yeah, it would only take what? *The energy of a quadrillion nuclear bombs to move the moon 1m/s? Are all republican Yids as dumbfounded as yourself? The need is not there. *Why bother? *If we have to move a few cities that is the consequence of living on a mutable planet. Remember, a large quantity of the United States was under water at one point in time, recently. Your mainstream obfuscation and perpetual denials are noted, and without your support, Big Energy greed and debauchery wouldn't stand a chance. Earth is also ever so gradually shrinking and otherwise losing considerable mass, as well as the artificial/human assisted erosion process has accelerated nature by at least 10 fold over the last couple hundred years, and our rising oceans are not only becoming devoid of biodiversity and toxin polluted, but also populated by expanding dead zones that only jellyfish and a few other weird blobs of life seem to like, whereas natural diatoms as a vast and complex a global species are pretty much done for. ~ BG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in ... What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon further away.? We have to protect high waves from destroying cities like NYC London etc. We could do it. Bert PS Think New Orleans Yeah, it would only take what? The energy of a quadrillion nuclear bombs to move the moon 1m/s? Are all republican Yids as dumbfounded as yourself? Okay, so it won't take that many nukes? What's your answer? Talk about obfuscation. Either prove it wrong or STFU. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 13, 4:45*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ... On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in ... What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon further away.? *We have to protect high waves from destroying cities like NYC London etc. We could do it. *Bert *PS Think New Orleans Yeah, it would only take what? *The energy of a quadrillion nuclear bombs to move the moon 1m/s? Are all republican Yids as dumbfounded as yourself? Okay, so it won't take that many nukes? *What's your answer? Talk about obfuscation. *Either prove it wrong or STFU. Use a million tonnes of the moon itself, as tethered at its own 1.5x L2, (possibly 2xL2) and just let those natural centripetal forces do their thing of gradually pulling our Selene/moon further away from Earth. It's a little more complicated than that, but it's not insurmountably complex. ~ BG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in ... snipperoony GuthBall drivel The Moon is receding from Earth appr. 3.7cm per year ... so just wait a few billion years and it'll fly off into space by itself, GuthBall. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 14, 7:12*am, "Hagar" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in ... snipperoony GuthBall drivel The Moon is receding from Earth appr. 3.7cm per year ... so just wait a few billion years and it'll fly off into space by itself, GuthBall. No way do we have billions of years. It needs our help, and Earth needs that little spot of shade, as well as we could all do a whole lot better with less Newtonian tidal force, and by all means the sooner the better. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Distance from the earth to the moon | catzz66 | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | July 11th 08 06:53 PM |
Distance to horizon on Moon and Earth | canopus56[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | February 19th 07 12:43 PM |
Changing moon/earth distance. | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | January 19th 07 11:03 PM |
Exact distance to the Moon | Johnny | Misc | 4 | October 7th 04 07:22 AM |