![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sometimes when I look up the sky thru a telescope. I asked
myself. Is amateur astronomy all about looking up at planets, stars, nebulae, etc. and enjoying the views... much like entertainment and watching TV or Live Sports. Or is it much more... Closing up my eyes. I looked inside and asked. Can astronomy help solved the riddle of existence.. esp the more subtle side of it. Many people believe that everything is just physical and we are just physical aftermath of the Big Bang, etc. But when you include consciousness in the equation, the situation changes. What is consciousness? Is consciousness inside space/time.. or is space/time inside consciousness. If its the latter, then the key to understanding the universe lies first in understanding ourselves. If I didn't have experiences about the subtle reality of consciousness. I'd treat is just like a philosophical question. But it is one of "technical". First, energy follows thoughts. The subatomic particles of all the cells in the body somehow serves as matrix for our consciousness. When the line or interface is not rightfully severed at death. An energy shell remains... which is called "Ghost". And I have dealt with ghosts. They are not the personality themselves of the dead person but a template or matrix of energy that once hold the person's.emotions and thoughts and most often are automatic in execution such as a certain ghost doing the same thing over and over again in a certain haunted house. There is an institute in my country that assist in dissolving the energy pattern to "exorcise" the haunting. This is our specialization in our country. In emotional health, this subatomic or quantum templates (or called aura) serve as energetic representation of the biochemical network that dictates emotions as it is registered in the brain. Not only this. But the subatomic property is nonlocal in that you can disrupt a person energetic templates at a distance (even countries away), thereby ruining his/her health and emotional well being. In medieval times, this is called sorcery where voodoo dolls which serves as a quantum model of the victim is manipulated thereby affecting the person at a distance even if continent apart. In Asia, we have a center that treat victim of this quantum sorcery by fixing or welding the energy vortex or "chakra". And I can prove this to any person as I'm aware of all the technical details of it. Now what has this got to do with amateur astronomy. Many will complain at this point. Well. As above so below. The mechanism that can explain nonlocal quantum effects may also explain the universe mysteries. Some will state that science has fully understood Quantum Mechanics and I'm just erroneously adding what's not there, but note that Quantum Mechanics as it pertains to the physical world may be very understood, but if you put the human body and consciousness equation into it, then it becomes another field. That another field I don't know what is. That's why I write to gain more understanding of it. I want to understand the scientific process of what I've observed and experienced in the decades I'm in it. First, how do you explain the nonlocal quantum effect, some may say the scientific experiment is faulty. Suppose it is accurate (and as shown in actual experiences, it is indeed real). Can Super String theory explain it, what does this stand in the scientific community like how can it explain the universe. How about this theory that there is only one particle in the universe, and it moves so fast that it creates our entire physical continuum. I'm not so familiar with this theory or where it comes from, etc. Or how about the ether theory which is not proven from experiment on the moon and earth (but note if it's not physical, it can elude scientific physical proof). Is there any theory in science and astronomy that can explain the non local quantum effects?? I don't know or claim to understand how it works (although I'm certain the nonlocal quantum effect is real from decades of first hand experiences on it, etc. and I'll bet my life on it.) If you know of other theories that can explain nonlocal quantum effect. Pls share it. This is also astronomy as the matrix where the universe is built may use the same principles. Astronomy includes both observation of the sky and trying to understand the universe (if it's only observation, then it would just result in comparing scopes and fighting over who got the better strehl, but if it includes understanding as well, then we can all band ourselves together with the common goal of trying to understand the universe and our place in it). Opti |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Optidud wrote:
What is consciousness? Is consciousness inside space/time.. or is space/time inside consciousness. If its the latter, then the key to understanding the universe lies first in understanding ourselves. First, energy follows thoughts. The subatomic particles of all the cells in the body somehow serves as matrix for our consciousness. When the line or interface is not rightfully severed at death. An energy shell remains... which is called "Ghost". [...] Now what has this got to do with amateur astronomy.[...] I'm sorry, but I believe that the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics, string theory and other such things are largely outside the scope of astronomy - although there has always been a historical link between astronomy and philosophy. Regarding the "sub-atomic survivance of bodies as ghosts"-theory, I would be curious to learn about its "scientific" foundations, but the main problem with this, and the reason I wanted to reply, is that it is still very far from explaining consciousness. If consciousness can be explained with physical theories (including sub-atomic units), then you face the same problem as the materialists you criticise: everything is material; and if you attribute consciousness to something non-physical, then you still have to explain the link (or the separation )of this "spiritual universe" with physical matter (including sub-atomic units). I don't believe your theory should be rejected, but these things are usually more difficult than they appear in the first place. Vindo |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "optidud" wrote in message om... energy follows thought Philisophically, maybe thought "directs" energy, but from the physical perspective this statement is simply not true. To remain conscious, one must feed the body. When the body quits, the brain dies, and thought ceases. So thought is possible only with an energy _source_. It's not really a huge jump to conclude that energy preexists thought. I further conclude that there is only life and death. Everything you do between, in one way or another, depends on what you believe. I believe that astronomy suggests alternative ideas about the universe, the earth, and the origin of life that counteract years of religious thought, and therefore provides a much needed balance to my thought life. In my current thinking, what I believe about life, death and ethereal existence is no longer of any personal eternal or immediate consequence, all that matters is my behavior toward others right here, right now. If I am acting toward others in kindness, or in toughness, with a genuine concern for their success, then I think myself morally correct, and I'm content with my thoughts. When I am not content with my thoughts, I increase rest and excercise, and I eat right, because I know there is something wrong with my thoughts, and therefore the fuel mixture must be getting a little too rich, or a little too lean. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 15:25:07 -0400, "Stephen Paul"
wrote: When I am not content with my thoughts, I increase rest and excercise, and I eat right, because I know there is something wrong with my thoughts, and therefore the fuel mixture must be getting a little too rich, or a little too lean. Not very chromatic but well said... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(clairvoyant is the term but the word has
negative cannotations to it because of many quackery in the field). Hi: "Humbug" is another word to describe the same thing. Oh, yes, things like this are interesting, but there's not a shred of convincing, repeatable PROOF for any of it. Is there? Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thesis on MacDougall Space and the Astral Form part 2 | Rick Sobie | Astronomy Misc | 2 | November 11th 03 02:24 PM |