Most distant gamma ray burst just seen

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8022917.stm

oc Thank you for sharing that with us. At 13 billion LY away it could
be bigger than the 1999 blast. That NASA gamma ray detector records a
blast about every day. That star exploded and imploded and naturally I
use this as natures balancing act. The theory goes like this. When the
star that explodes equally both in and out a black hole will form at
its core,and the outer part will go from one end of the universe to the
other .Its all universe's parts that come under my equivalent theory
that I am tying more and more too. go figure Trebert

On Apr 28, 9:29*am, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8022917.stm

Sirius B once gave us a gamma burst, and apparently not so terribly
long ago.

~ BG

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 9:29 am, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8022917.stm

Sirius B once gave us a gamma burst, and apparently not so terribly
long ago.

~ BG

*****************************************
And you know this exactly how ???
Did you see it ??
Did you measure it ??
Or are you pulling this stuff out of your ass, as usual ???

On Apr 28, 12:26*pm, "Hagar" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Apr 28, 9:29 am, wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8022917.stm

Sirius B once gave us a gamma burst, and apparently not so terribly
long ago.

*~ BG

* * * * *****************************************
And you know this exactly how ???
Did you see it ??
Did you measure it ??
Or are you pulling this stuff out of your ass, as usual ???

Have you a white dwarf example that wasn't ever a red giant?

Are you suggesting an alternative formation process of creating white
dwarfs?

There's all sorts of peer reviewed and mainstream accepted science
that has the age of the Sirius star/solar system pegged at 250 to 300
million years old. Some even suggest as recent as 200 million years.

Are you now saying that those of your very own kind are bogus, as
having been using conditional physics and obfuscation in order to suit
whatever mindset is getting the most public funded?

~ BG

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Apr 28, 12:26 pm, "Hagar" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Apr 28, 9:29 am, wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8022917.stm

Sirius B once gave us a gamma burst, and apparently not so terribly
long ago.

~ BG

*****************************************
And you know this exactly how ???
Did you see it ??
Did you measure it ??
Or are you pulling this stuff out of your ass, as usual ???

Have you a white dwarf example that wasn't ever a red giant?

Are you suggesting an alternative formation process of creating white
dwarfs?

There's all sorts of peer reviewed and mainstream accepted science
that has the age of the Sirius star/solar system pegged at 250 to 300
million years old. Some even suggest as recent as 200 million years.

Are you now saying that those of your very own kind are bogus, as
having been using conditional physics and obfuscation in order to suit
whatever mindset is getting the most public funded?

~ BG

***********************************
GuthBall, stars, which wind up as White Dwarfs do not explode and thus
produce no gamma ray bursts. They grow to gigantic proportions when there
is not enough internal pressure to start the next higher order of fusion,
but well below that of iron. They swell and shed their exteriors and
eventually collapse into a fraction of their former size and mass and then
just fade into cold pile of ashes, over millions of years, of course. At no
time is there a gamma ray bursts involved in that process.

On Apr 28, 2:02*pm, "Hagar" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Apr 28, 12:26 pm, "Hagar" wrote:



"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Apr 28, 9:29 am, wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8022917.stm

Sirius B once gave us a gamma burst, and apparently not so terribly
long ago.

~ BG

*****************************************
And you know this exactly how ???
Did you see it ??
Did you measure it ??
Or are you pulling this stuff out of your ass, as usual ???

Have you a white dwarf example that wasn't ever a red giant?

Are you suggesting an alternative formation process of creating white
dwarfs?

There's all sorts of peer reviewed and mainstream accepted science
that has the age of the Sirius star/solar system pegged at 250 to 300
million years old. *Some even suggest as recent as 200 million years.

Are you now saying that those of your very own kind are bogus, as
having been using conditional physics and obfuscation in order to suit
whatever mindset is getting the most public funded?

*~ BG

* * * * * * ***********************************
GuthBall, stars, which wind up as White Dwarfs do not explode and thus
produce no gamma ray bursts. *They grow to gigantic proportions when there
is not enough internal pressure to start the next higher order of fusion,
but well below that of iron. *They swell and shed their exteriors and
eventually collapse into a fraction of their former size and mass and then
just fade into cold pile of ashes, over millions of years, of course. *At no
time is there a gamma ray bursts involved in that process.

And the last time a red supergiant shell flashover event (soft nova)
was directly observed and thus having been remote measured for gamma
was???????

~ BG

On Apr 28, 9:29*am, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8022917.stm

What about the gamma from our reactive/anticathode as well as naked
Selene/moon?

~ BG