![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for
ISS? D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Derek Lyons" wrote in message
... What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for ISS? D. W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet. Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins -- Greg Moore Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 12:39*pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: "Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for ISS? D. W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet. Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins -- Greg Moore Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC. Incorrect for direct insertion. The tank follows the orbiter to apogee where OMS-2 is performed |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes this must be so as the insertion low point is around 37 miles as I
recall. Its the burn that circularises things otherwise the shuttle would presumably re enter as well. Brian -- Brian Gaff - Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff' in the display name may be lost. Blind user, so no pictures please! wrote in message ... On Mar 18, 12:39 pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: "Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for ISS? D. W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet. Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins -- Greg Moore Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC. Incorrect for direct insertion. The tank follows the orbiter to apogee where OMS-2 is performed |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hmm, my mistake, I was reading the separation column. So, as far as I can tell, Jenkin's doesn't provide the direct data on the ET apogee But if we look at page 333, it does give the OMS2 burn apogee which again eyeballing appear to be in the 180-200 mile range. (You can easily pick out the HST flights since those show up at well over 300 miles). (note Jenkins says "Miles" but not clear if it's Statute or Nautical in this case.) (chart on page 332 clearly says nm though for "from prediction" on ET re-entry point). wrote in message ... On Mar 18, 12:39 pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: "Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for ISS? D. W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet. Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins -- Greg Moore Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC. Incorrect for direct insertion. The tank follows the orbiter to apogee where OMS-2 is performed |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 4:20�pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: Hmm, my mistake, I was reading the separation column. �So, as far as I can tell, Jenkin's doesn't provide the direct data on the ET apogee But if we look at page 333, it does give the OMS2 burn apogee which again eyeballing appear to be in the 180-200 mile range. (You can easily pick out the HST flights since those show up at well over 300 miles). (note Jenkins says "Miles" but not clear if it's Statute or Nautical in this case.) (chart on page 332 clearly says nm though for "from prediction" on ET re-entry point). wrote in message ... On Mar 18, 12:39 pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: "Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for ISS? D. W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet. Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins -- Greg Moore Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC. Incorrect for direct insertion. �The tank follows the orbiter to apogee where OMS-2 is performed- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - imagine what sort of structure could be in orbit if most of the ETs had been assembled into a station |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bob haller wrote:
imagine what sort of structure could be in orbit if most of the ETs had been assembled into a station Interesting idea--I wonder if it would be possible to reach orbit with the ET still attached (e.g. how much extra fuel would be required at OMS-2)... You could have a very massive structure up there by lashing several together... now, how useful would it be based on the structure of the ET... I guess it could be used as a storage facility... or refilled on figure flights and used as an orbiting refueling station for later deep-space missions... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote:
"Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for ISS? D. W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet. Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins I wish to hell I could find where my my copy got off to. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apogee 4" f/10 refractor | elaich | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 21st 05 08:49 AM |
SS1: Abort to Apogee ? | Bob Niland | Space Shuttle | 5 | June 29th 04 05:37 AM |
What's with Apogee? | John Beaderstadt | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | December 11th 03 01:27 AM |
Apogee, Inc. | donutbandit | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | October 18th 03 04:45 AM |
Apogee 80mm f7 - Apogee Inc. | Rob Clark | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | October 10th 03 12:35 AM |