A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ET Apogee



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 18th 09, 04:02 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,999
Default ET Apogee

What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for
ISS?

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
  #2  
Old March 18th 09, 04:39 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,865
Default ET Apogee

"Derek Lyons" wrote in message
...
What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for
ISS?

D.


W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet.
Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins

--
Greg Moore
Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC.


  #3  
Old March 18th 09, 05:16 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 558
Default ET Apogee

On Mar 18, 12:39*pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote:
"Derek Lyons" wrote in message

...

What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for
ISS?


D.


W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet.
Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins

--
Greg Moore
Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC.


Incorrect for direct insertion. The tank follows the orbiter to
apogee where OMS-2 is performed
  #5  
Old March 18th 09, 08:20 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,865
Default ET Apogee


Hmm, my mistake, I was reading the separation column. So, as far as I can
tell, Jenkin's doesn't provide the direct data on the ET apogee

But if we look at page 333, it does give the OMS2 burn apogee which again
eyeballing appear to be in the 180-200 mile range. (You can easily pick out
the HST flights since those show up at well over 300 miles). (note Jenkins
says "Miles" but not clear if it's Statute or Nautical in this case.) (chart
on page 332 clearly says nm though for "from prediction" on ET re-entry
point).





wrote in message
...
On Mar 18, 12:39 pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote:
"Derek Lyons" wrote in message

...

What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for
ISS?


D.


W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet.
Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins

--
Greg Moore
Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC.


Incorrect for direct insertion. The tank follows the orbiter to
apogee where OMS-2 is performed


  #6  
Old March 18th 09, 09:35 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default ET Apogee

On Mar 18, 4:20�pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote:
Hmm, my mistake, I was reading the separation column. �So, as far as I can
tell, Jenkin's doesn't provide the direct data on the ET apogee

But if we look at page 333, it does give the OMS2 burn apogee which again
eyeballing appear to be in the 180-200 mile range. (You can easily pick out
the HST flights since those show up at well over 300 miles). (note Jenkins
says "Miles" but not clear if it's Statute or Nautical in this case.) (chart
on page 332 clearly says nm though for "from prediction" on ET re-entry
point).

wrote in message

...
On Mar 18, 12:39 pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"





wrote:
"Derek Lyons" wrote in message


...


What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for
ISS?


D.


W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet.
Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins


--
Greg Moore
Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC.


Incorrect for direct insertion. �The tank follows the orbiter to
apogee where OMS-2 is performed- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


imagine what sort of structure could be in orbit if most of the ETs
had been assembled into a station
  #7  
Old March 19th 09, 05:23 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Who Needs Fender?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default ET Apogee

bob haller wrote:

imagine what sort of structure could be in orbit if most of the ETs
had been assembled into a station


Interesting idea--I wonder if it would be possible to reach orbit with
the ET still attached (e.g. how much extra fuel would be required at
OMS-2)...

You could have a very massive structure up there by lashing several
together... now, how useful would it be based on the structure of the
ET... I guess it could be used as a storage facility... or refilled on
figure flights and used as an orbiting refueling station for later
deep-space missions...
  #8  
Old March 18th 09, 05:32 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,999
Default ET Apogee

"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote:

"Derek Lyons" wrote in message
...
What's the typical apogee for the ET of a Shuttle mission bound for
ISS?

D.


W/o number crunching too much, looks like 360,000-370,000 feet.
Page 332: 3rd Edition of Jenkins


I wish to hell I could find where my my copy got off to.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apogee 4" f/10 refractor elaich Amateur Astronomy 0 September 21st 05 08:49 AM
SS1: Abort to Apogee ? Bob Niland Space Shuttle 5 June 29th 04 05:37 AM
What's with Apogee? John Beaderstadt Amateur Astronomy 10 December 11th 03 01:27 AM
Apogee, Inc. donutbandit Amateur Astronomy 10 October 18th 03 04:45 AM
Apogee 80mm f7 - Apogee Inc. Rob Clark Amateur Astronomy 2 October 10th 03 12:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.