![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey has there been any discussion about this object here before? It's
about a planet orbiting a pulsar and a white dwarf inside a globular cluster. I know the story is a little old, but I found it fascinating. A planet that's 12.7 billion years old! Just a billion years after the Universe was banged out. The planet is in the pulsar system PSR B1620-26 in the globular cluster M4. The fact that the whole solar system was captured by the pulsar which already had a white dwarf around it, that it flung off to capture this solar system. The solar system was so old it's not even clear if there could've been rocky planets around it at one time, or if rocks hadn't yet formed. Yousuf Khan SPACE.com -- Primeval Planet: Oldest Known World Conjures Prospect of Ancient Life "Astronomers have discovered the oldest known planet, a primeval world 12.7 billion years old that will force them to reconsider how and when planets form. The discovery raises the prospect that life may have begun far sooner than most scientists ever imagined." http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._030710-1.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Yousuf Khan:
On Mar 9, 2:42*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote: Hey has there been any discussion about this object here before? It's about a planet orbiting a pulsar and a white dwarf inside a globular cluster. I know the story is a little old, but I found it fascinating. A planet that' s 12.7 billion years old! Just a billion years after the Universe was banged out. The planet is in the pulsar system PSR B1620-26 in the globular cluster M4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_B1620-26 .... a bit more current stuff. The CMBR back then was really hot, so it might have done something interesting a few billion years after formation. David A. Smith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dlzc wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_B1620-26 ... a bit more current stuff. The CMBR back then was really hot, so it might have done something interesting a few billion years after formation. What did you have in mind? Yousuf Khan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Yousuf Khan:
"Yousuf Khan" wrote in message ... dlzc wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_B1620-26 ... a bit more current stuff. The CMBR back then was really hot, so it might have done something interesting a few billion years after formation. What did you have in mind? I simply meant that the "cold sink" the planet would be able to send heat to was very hot, so hot that life such as we know it, even around volcanic vents, coudl not exist. A billion years later, things could cool down. David A. Smith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 9:49*pm, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"
wrote: The CMBR back then was really hot, so it might have done something interesting a few billion years after formation. What did you have in mind? I simply meant that the "cold sink" the planet would be able to send heat to was very hot, so hot that life such as we know it, even around volcanic vents, coudl not exist. *A billion years later, things could cool down. According to this the approximate temperature of the CMBR 1 billion years after BB was 10 Kelvin. Doesn't seem too hot to me. CMB temperature calculation - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum http://www.bautforum.com/space-astro...lculation.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear YKhan:
"YKhan" wrote in message ... On Mar 9, 9:49 pm, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" wrote: The CMBR back then was really hot, so it might have done something interesting a few billion years after formation. What did you have in mind? I simply meant that the "cold sink" the planet would be able to send heat to was very hot, so hot that life such as we know it, even around volcanic vents, coudl not exist. A billion years later, things could cool down. According to this the approximate temperature of the CMBR 1 billion years after BB was 10 Kelvin. Doesn't seem too hot to me. CMB temperature calculation - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum http://www.bautforum.com/space-astro...lculation.html Well, at 270,000 years, he doesn't get ~3000K (a data point we know), but OK. Even 50K might not be too bad. Thanks for the link. David A. Smith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
oldest planet 13 billion years old in M-4 | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 14th 03 06:22 PM |
Hubble Helps Confirm Oldest Known Planet | Ron Baalke | Misc | 8 | July 13th 03 08:34 PM |
Oldest planet | Lasse Murtomäki | Misc | 1 | July 11th 03 10:48 AM |
Hubble Helps Confirm Oldest Known Planet | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 10th 03 07:35 PM |
Hubble Helps Confirm Oldest Known Planet | Ron Baalke | News | 0 | July 10th 03 07:35 PM |