![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To the Group:
"Andrew Yee" wrote in message ... .... They have shown that the compact object orbiting the 23-millisecond pulsar PSR J0737-3039A with a period of just 2.4 hours is not only, as suspected, another neutron star but is also a detectable pulsar, PSR J0737-3039B, that is rotating once every 2.8 seconds. One would wonder about tidal accelerations. If the Moon gets a "boost" from Earth's tides, does "neutronium" have any give that would allow similar angular momentum transfer. Anyone know what the 2.4 hour period is doing secularly? David A. Smith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NDT\" == N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) N writes:
They have shown that the compact object orbiting the 23-millisecond pulsar PSR J0737-3039A with a period of just 2.4 hours is not only, as suspected, another neutron star but is also a detectable pulsar, PSR J0737-3039B, that is rotating once every 2.8 seconds. NDT One would wonder about tidal accelerations. If the Moon gets a NDT "boost" from Earth's tides, does "neutronium" have any give that NDT would allow similar angular momentum transfer. Anyone know what NDT the 2.4 hour period is doing secularly? I don't know if this has been measured yet, although it is expected to increase with time by the emission of gravitational radiation (much like what is happening with PSR B1913+16). Tidal effects shouldn't be that important, though. The two neutron stars are about 10 km in diameter. They are separated by about 1 million km. -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Joseph Lazio:
"Joseph Lazio" wrote in message ... "NDT\" == N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) N writes: They have shown that the compact object orbiting the 23-millisecond pulsar PSR J0737-3039A with a period of just 2.4 hours is not only, as suspected, another neutron star but is also a detectable pulsar, PSR J0737-3039B, that is rotating once every 2.8 seconds. NDT One would wonder about tidal accelerations. If the Moon gets a NDT "boost" from Earth's tides, does "neutronium" have any give that NDT would allow similar angular momentum transfer. Anyone know what NDT the 2.4 hour period is doing secularly? I don't know if this has been measured yet, although it is expected to increase with time by the emission of gravitational radiation (much like what is happening with PSR B1913+16). I guess I don't understand why it would *increase*. Transfer of angular momentum from the Earth to the Moon increases the period. *Loss* of angular momentum to the Universe at large would make the period *shorter*, no? Did you mean to say the period would decrease, not increase? Tidal effects shouldn't be that important, though. The two neutron stars are about 10 km in diameter. They are separated by about 1 million km. Assuming we have space travel, and are situated about 10AU out from the mass center of such a system, and about 1AU above its ecliptic, what do you imagine we could see? Assuming the radiation didn't kill us, of course... Could we see the sizes of these bodies, would there be visible light? David A. Smith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NDT\" == N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) N writes:
NDT "Joseph Lazio" wrote in message NDT ... "NDT\" == N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) N writes: They have shown that the compact object orbiting the 23-millisecond pulsar PSR J0737-3039A with a period of just 2.4 hours is not only, as suspected, another neutron star but is also a detectable pulsar, PSR J0737-3039B, that is rotating once every 2.8 seconds. NDT One would wonder about tidal accelerations. If the Moon gets a NDT "boost" from Earth's tides, does "neutronium" have any give that NDT would allow similar angular momentum transfer. Anyone know what NDT the 2.4 hour period is doing secularly? I don't know if this has been measured yet, although it is expected to increase with time by the emission of gravitational radiation (...). NDT I guess I don't understand why it would *increase*. Transfer of NDT angular momentum from the Earth to the Moon increases the NDT period. *Loss* of angular momentum to the Universe at large NDT would make the period *shorter*, no? Did you mean to say the NDT period would decrease, not increase? Umm, yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for catching that. Tidal effects shouldn't be that important, though. The two neutron stars are about 10 km in diameter. They are separated by about 1 million km. NDT Assuming we have space travel, and are situated about 10AU out NDT from the mass center of such a system, and about 1AU above its NDT ecliptic, what do you imagine we could see? Assuming the NDT radiation didn't kill us, of course... Could we see the sizes NDT of these bodies, would there be visible light? Take a look at one of my answers on MadSci, URL: http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives...2761.As.r.html . Does that address your question? -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Joseph Lazio:
"Joseph Lazio" wrote in message ... "NDT\" == N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) N writes: .... I don't know if this has been measured yet, although it is expected to increase with time by the emission of gravitational radiation (...). NDT I guess I don't understand why it would *increase*. Transfer of NDT angular momentum from the Earth to the Moon increases the NDT period. *Loss* of angular momentum to the Universe at large NDT would make the period *shorter*, no? Did you mean to say the NDT period would decrease, not increase? Umm, yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for catching that. No issues. You may have earned your halo, but you just don't wear it all the time... Tidal effects shouldn't be that important, though. The two neutron stars are about 10 km in diameter. They are separated by about 1 million km. NDT Assuming we have space travel, and are situated about 10AU out NDT from the mass center of such a system, and about 1AU above its NDT ecliptic, what do you imagine we could see? Assuming the NDT radiation didn't kill us, of course... Could we see the sizes NDT of these bodies, would there be visible light? Take a look at one of my answers on MadSci, URL: http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives...2761.As.r.html . Does that address your question? Yes. Perfectly. If it is big enough to admire, you are on fire. David A. Smith |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Andrew Yee
wrote: [...snip...] First-Known Double Pulsar Opens Up New Astrophysics An international team of scientists from the UK, Australia, Italy and the USA have announced in today's issue of the journal Science Express (8th January 2004) the first discovery of a double pulsar system. They have shown that the compact object orbiting the 23-millisecond pulsar PSR J0737-3039A with a period of just 2.4 hours is not only, as suspected, another neutron star but is also a detectable pulsar, PSR J0737-3039B, that is rotating once every 2.8 seconds. [...snip...] This paper is available from arXiv, ( www.arXiv.org ), it is number 0401086, "A Double-Pulsar System -...", Lyne, Burgay, etal. Dark Skies, tom -- We have discovered a therapy ( NOT a cure ) for the common cold. Play tuba for an hour. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First Double Star satellite successfully launched (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 29th 03 11:35 PM |
New launch date set for Chinese/ESA Double Star mission (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 26th 03 06:29 PM |
Discovery of a double impact crater in Libya (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 17th 03 04:00 PM |
Pulsar find boosts hope for gravity-wave hunters (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 3rd 03 10:16 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |