Interesting "Planet_X" Information From Russia!

Here come the Russians to the rescue!

It appears that our friends in the Russian government are becoming far
more forthcoming in revealing their secrets. The following extracts were
transcribed from a filmed interview with Valery Uvarov, of Russia's
National Security Academy. In the interview, he exposes some very
interesting information regarding this so called "Planet_X" phenomenon.

Here is the link to the article for folks who might be interested. (All
others please disregard this post.)

http://www.rense.com/general41/ds.htm

"Rudolph_X" wrote in message
...
Here come the Russians to the rescue!

... he exposes some very interesting information regarding this so called
"Planet_X" phenomenon.

"Not in here..."
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg

David A. Smith

(formerly) wrote:

"Rudolph_X" wrote in message
...
Here come the Russians to the rescue!



... he exposes some very interesting information regarding this so called


"Planet_X" phenomenon.

"Not in here..."

David A. Smith



When confronted with what they don't want to see or are afraid to hear
about mose folks 'stick their heads in the sand', others wear
'blinders', but what you're link portrays is ridiculous, and certainly
good for a laugh. Thanks for your disgusting comment. I'm always happy
to hear from the loyal opposition.

In article , Rudolph_X
wrote:

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
html

This is usenet, zetadrone, learn how to post.


-=-=-=-=-

"Rudolph_X" wrote in message
...
Here come the Russians to the rescue!

... he exposes some very interesting information regarding this so called
"Planet_X" phenomenon.
************** ********
You have a lot of sympathy for being who and what you are.
By the way, did you not once post that you would not post on this
subject again??
As for your beloved Planet-X, I would suggest that you carfully
review what is being claimed: and wonder why no effects upon
other planets in the solar system have been noted.
And, of course, that oh, so-secret installation can not be
pinpointed?
Again, you have my sympathy for being yourself.
---Mac

Mac wrote:

"Rudolph_X" wrote in message
.. .
Here come the Russians to the rescue!

... he exposes some very interesting information regarding this so called
"Planet_X" phenomenon.


************** ********
You have a lot of sympathy for being who and what you are.
By the way, did you not once post that you would not post on this
subject again??

The Nancy_X hoax claimed a 3,600 year orbit. The Russian interview spoke
of another planet in an orbit similar to that of Earth's, only on the
other side of the Sun. These are clearly two different subjects. The
Russian also spoke about the secret 'alien' underground base in Siberia
which regulates the orbits of of the planets and maintains stability in
our solar system. He also mentioned that there are 3 similar 'alien'
bases in the USA. (I, of course don't subscribe to any of these
theories, although I find them entertaining and sometimes thought
provoking.)

As for your beloved Planet-X, I would suggest that you carfully
review what is being claimed: and wonder why no effects upon
other planets in the solar system have been noted.

I addressed this issue in my answer to another similar post, so I won't
repeat it here. I refer you to that reply.

I apperciate your sympathy. Thanks for your comments!

Rudolph_X :

{SNIP usual ZetaDrone garbage]

But Rudolph_X, Planet X was suppose to come months ago and wipe out all us
debunkers. But we are still here, and all our predictions have been corret.
On the otherhand not one of Nancy's predictions for planet x came true and
here you are still trying to push the same old claims that never panned out
in the first place.

Add onto it the fact that you said that you would never post here again, yet
here you are making a liar out of yourself, then why care anything about what
you say when we already know that you and Nancy are both self-admitted liars?
Please get a life.

Earl Colby Pottinger

--
I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos,
SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to
the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp

Earl Colby Pottinger wrote:

Rudolph_X :

{SNIP usual ZetaDrone garbage]

But Rudolph_X, Planet X was suppose to come months ago and wipe out all us
debunkers. But we are still here, and all our predictions have been corret.
On the otherhand not one of Nancy's predictions for planet x came true and
here you are still trying to push the same old claims that never panned out
in the first place.

Add onto it the fact that you said that you would never post here again, yet
here you are making a liar out of yourself, then why care anything about what
you say when we already know that you and Nancy are both self-admitted liars?
Please get a life.

Earl Colby Pottinger


You should know by now, that I like to drop in from time to time, just
to see what you folks are up to.

Hey, I didn't write that article. I just provided a link to it. Folks
can decide for themselves if what was written there is true or false.
Calling me a liar isn't going to change that.

My detractors always engage in personal attacks... they never discuss
the issues at hand. The link I posted was about what a Russian scientist
had to say about 'Planet_X'... The content of the article has nothing to
do with me. I didn't write it. I just posted a link to it. Personal
attacks against me... have nothing whatsoever to do with what the
Russian scientist said about Planet_X.

Hey, thanks for your comments anyway. It is always nice to hear from
you, you old rattlesnake.

In article ,
Rudolph_X wrote:

Earl Colby Pottinger wrote:

Rudolph_X :

{SNIP usual ZetaDrone garbage]

But Rudolph_X, Planet X was suppose to come months ago and wipe out all us
debunkers. But we are still here, and all our predictions have been corret.
On the otherhand not one of Nancy's predictions for planet x came true and
here you are still trying to push the same old claims that never panned out
in the first place.

Add onto it the fact that you said that you would never post here again, yet
here you are making a liar out of yourself, then why care anything about what
you say when we already know that you and Nancy are both self-admitted liars?
Please get a life.

Earl Colby Pottinger

You should know by now, that I like to drop in from time to time, just
to see what you folks are up to.

True, we know by now that your claims are nothing to trust.....


Hey, I didn't write that article. I just provided a link to it.

You did more than that --- you also claimed it was "interesting"....

Folks can decide for themselves if what was written there is true or false.

The article is obviously false! I mean, it's impossible for a
planet, or ANY celestial body, to move in an Earth-like orbit and
always be hidden from our view by the Sun, and at the same time have
an orbital period of 3600 years as this article claims.... In
addition any "anti-Earth" moving in the Earth's orbit but on the
other side of the Sun such that the Sun always hides it from our
vire, such a planet would soon reveal its presence anyway by its
perturbations on the other planets (in particular Venus and Mars).
No such perturbations have ever been observed.

He also wrote a lot of other nonsense besides his speculations about
PX. Here he was much more vague though, so at least he avoided
outright self-contradictions. Consider this:

# GB: Can you be more specific about the location of this installation?
#
# VU: Look for the site of the Tunguska explosion. To the southeast is
# the very large and famous Lake Baikal. Beyond that, to the
# north, is a huge and barren territory covering 100,000
# kilometres. Hardly anyone lives there. There are no towns or
# cities. Here is where we located the installation ...

He never gets more specific than this. Why didn't he instead just
provide an accurate longitude and latitude of this "installation" he
claims to have found? Today it's easy to do so, with GPS receivers
being so easily available.

(also: he doesn't seem to know the difference between kilometers and
square kilometers.... but perhaps he meant that this barren area was
100,000 kilometers across? Well, if so, it's indeed a huge barren
area, with a diameter some eight times larger than the diameter of
the entire Earth!!! g )

Calling me a liar isn't going to change that.

My detractors always engage in personal attacks... they never discuss
the issues at hand. The link I posted was about what a Russian scientist
had to say about 'Planet_X'... The content of the article has nothing to
do with me. I didn't write it. I just posted a link to it. Personal
attacks against me... have nothing whatsoever to do with what the
Russian scientist said about Planet_X.

But what he has to say about PX, which you find "interesting"
according to your own words, is just as impossible as what N*nc* had
to say about PX..... nothing new here.....

Hey, thanks for your comments anyway. It is always nice to hear from
you, you old rattlesnake.

THINK before you post next time, will you ????

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW: http://www.stjarnhimlen.se/
http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/

Paul Schlyter wrote:

In article ,
Rudolph_X wrote:



Earl Colby Pottinger wrote:



Rudolph_X :

{SNIP usual ZetaDrone garbage]

But Rudolph_X, Planet X was suppose to come months ago and wipe out all us
debunkers. But we are still here, and all our predictions have been corret.
On the otherhand not one of Nancy's predictions for planet x came true and
here you are still trying to push the same old claims that never panned out
in the first place.

Add onto it the fact that you said that you would never post here again, yet
here you are making a liar out of yourself, then why care anything about what
you say when we already know that you and Nancy are both self-admitted liars?
Please get a life.

Earl Colby Pottinger


You should know by now, that I like to drop in from time to time, just
to see what you folks are up to.



True, we know by now that your claims are nothing to trust.....




Hey, I didn't write that article. I just provided a link to it.



You did more than that --- you also claimed it was "interesting"....

Folks have been discussing PX on this newsgroup for nearly 10 years -
because it is NOT interesting? Is that what you are saying? Of course it
is interesting - for folks who take an interest is this kind of subject
matter.




Folks can decide for themselves if what was written there is true or false.



The article is obviously false! I mean, it's impossible for a
planet, or ANY celestial body, to move in an Earth-like orbit and
always be hidden from our view by the Sun, and at the same time have
an orbital period of 3600 years as this article claims....

The article does not claim that. The Russian scientist said he heard
rumors about a 3,600 year orbit, but he counters that by saying that he
is talking about a planet which has an orbit similar to that of Earth's,
but on the other side of the Sun. He also claims that the 'alien' base
in Siberia regulates the orbits of both planets and to maintain
stability in our solar system. (I personally don't subscribe to these
theories, however they are interesting and thought provoking speculations.)

In
addition any "anti-Earth" moving in the Earth's orbit but on the
other side of the Sun such that the Sun always hides it from our
vire, such a planet would soon reveal its presence anyway by its
perturbations on the other planets (in particular Venus and Mars).

Not if, as the Russian scientist claims that, the orbits are being
regulated by the 'alien' underground base in Siberia. (He also said that
there are 3 other similar bases in the USA.)

No such perturbations have ever been observed.

And, they are not likely to be observed, if indeed the 'aliens' are
keeping knowledge of the other planet hidden from us. If these 'aliens'
are manitaining the stability of our solar system, with their advanced
scientific technology, no such irrregular perturbations would be
casually evident.


He also wrote a lot of other nonsense besides his speculations about
PX. Here he was much more vague though, so at least he avoided
outright self-contradictions.

I don't know if the Russian was speaking broken-english or if the
interview was translated, but one should realize the language barrier
can sometimes cause confusion. The transcript does not reveal or convey
a Russian accent or the manner of speech used. Something is always lost
in translations from foreign lanuages, and this could account for the
apparent vagueness of some of the comments made.

I doubt that the Russian scientist who is the head of an official
Russian government agency in charge of the investigation, is a stupid
person, simply because he may not be fluent in the English language.

Consider this:

# GB: Can you be more specific about the location of this installation?
#
# VU: Look for the site of the Tunguska explosion. To the southeast is
# the very large and famous Lake Baikal. Beyond that, to the
# north, is a huge and barren territory covering 100,000
# kilometres. Hardly anyone lives there. There are no towns or
# cities. Here is where we located the installation ...

He never gets more specific than this. Why didn't he instead just
provide an accurate longitude and latitude of this "installation" he
claims to have found? Today it's easy to do so, with GPS receivers
being so easily available.

Like I said, the language barrier could have caused this. The Russian
obviously doesn't speak english good enough to convey his thoughts as
clearly as we would like. We would have to see the filmed interview to
get a sense of what was really said.


(also: he doesn't seem to know the difference between kilometers and
square kilometers.... but perhaps he meant that this barren area was
100,000 kilometers across? Well, if so, it's indeed a huge barren
area, with a diameter some eight times larger than the diameter of
the entire Earth!!! g )



Calling me a liar isn't going to change that.

My detractors always engage in personal attacks... they never discuss
the issues at hand. The link I posted was about what a Russian scientist
had to say about 'Planet_X'... The content of the article has nothing to
do with me. I didn't write it. I just posted a link to it. Personal
attacks against me... have nothing whatsoever to do with what the
Russian scientist said about Planet_X.



But what he has to say about PX, which you find "interesting"
according to your own words, is just as impossible as what N*nc* had
to say about PX..... nothing new here.....

Like I said earlier, I don't fully subscribe to either of those
theories. I do, however, find them to be entertaining, and certainly of
interest to anyone who has followed the various and diverse PX
discussions on this newsgroup over the past 10 years.




Hey, thanks for your comments anyway. It is always nice to hear from
you, you old rattlesnake.



THINK before you post next time, will you ????


Your response was the only one given here that actually touched on some
of the issues put forward in the Russian interview. Thanks for your
comments.