![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OT, I know, but I couldn't find what looked like an appropriate newsgroup...
We know looking directly at the sun will damage the human eye. What about on Mars? Jupiter? More generally, what is the threshold distance beyond which it would be considered "safe" to look at the sun? I guess this is a Poynting vector/physiology type question. Searching the web just adds to the confusion. Is the distance close enough to still resolve the sun's disk or so far away that it appears as only a point light source? On some afternoons, depending on clouds and atmospheric dust, the sun looks like a giant orange ball that you can actually look at without eye damage as it sets, but I've no idea what attenuation of its intensity that translates into. -- bp Proud Member of the Human O-Ring Society Since 2003 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Bruce Palmer wrote:
On some afternoons, depending on clouds and atmospheric dust, the sun looks like a giant orange ball that you can actually look at without eye damage as it sets, I saw an annular eclipse, just on the point where it rose above the horizon as it left "totality" (okay, maxima, YKWIM). Got about maybe five degrees up, then we could see a sliver... thick morning mist... which meant we could sit and watch the sun, no protective equipment or any form of discomfort, for the best part of half an hour as the moon slipped in front of it. Remarkable. These clear-sky eclipses don't have *all* the tricks :-) -- -Andrew Gray |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bruce Palmer wrote: On some afternoons, depending on clouds and atmospheric dust, the sun looks like a giant orange ball that you can actually look at without eye damage as it sets... A note of caution: safely low visible-light intensity doesn't necessarily equate to safely low UV and IR intensity (especially the latter, which has a tendency to penetrate clouds etc. better than visible light). Your eye is not a reliable guide to what's eye-safe. (I'll admit to having yielded to the temptation to look in such situations, especially when there were naked-eye sunspot groups visible... but only in brief glances, never looking steadily.) -- MOST launched 30 June; science observations running | Henry Spencer since Oct; first surprises seen; papers pending. | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Henry Spencer" wrote in message ... In article , Bruce Palmer wrote: On some afternoons, depending on clouds and atmospheric dust, the sun looks like a giant orange ball that you can actually look at without eye damage as it sets... A note of caution: safely low visible-light intensity doesn't necessarily equate to safely low UV and IR intensity (especially the latter, which has a tendency to penetrate clouds etc. better than visible light). Your eye is not a reliable guide to what's eye-safe. This is in fact my understanding of exactly why total eclipses are so dangerous. You're not expecting the still high UV/IR does and your pupils are more dilated than usual, allowing more light in. (I'll admit to having yielded to the temptation to look in such situations, especially when there were naked-eye sunspot groups visible... but only in brief glances, never looking steadily.) So, build a shadow box. An old shoe-box works great. I keep mine around for eclipses. Should scale it up so I can watch sunspots. -- MOST launched 30 June; science observations running | Henry Spencer since Oct; first surprises seen; papers pending. | |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg D. Moore (Strider)" wrote in message ... "Henry Spencer" wrote in message ... In article , Bruce Palmer wrote: On some afternoons, depending on clouds and atmospheric dust, the sun looks like a giant orange ball that you can actually look at without eye damage as it sets... A note of caution: safely low visible-light intensity doesn't necessarily equate to safely low UV and IR intensity (especially the latter, which has a tendency to penetrate clouds etc. better than visible light). Your eye is not a reliable guide to what's eye-safe. This is in fact my understanding of exactly why total eclipses are so dangerous. You're not expecting the still high UV/IR does and your pupils are more dilated than usual, allowing more light in. (I'll admit to having yielded to the temptation to look in such situations, especially when there were naked-eye sunspot groups visible... but only in brief glances, never looking steadily.) So, build a shadow box. An old shoe-box works great. I keep mine around for eclipses. Should scale it up so I can watch sunspots. I used a colander from the kitchen, and I got dozens of little crescents on the wall last time (4-12-2002) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Neil Gerace wrote:
I used a colander from the kitchen, and I got dozens of little crescents on the wall last time (4-12-2002) Next time, try saltines as well. The only optical imaging system you can eat after the eclipse is over. -- Bill Higgins | They can have my World Almanac Fermilab | when they pry it from my cold, dead fingers. Internet: | Or when next year's edition comes out, whichever is first. | --Lois A. Fundis |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:21:10 -0600, Bill Higgins
wrote: Next time, try saltines as well. ....****, when I did this in High School, everyone thought I was nuts. Good to see someone else thought of that one as well :-) OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reading in the bathroom when I ran across an item written by
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" on Mon, 05 Jan 2004 04:41:22 GMT, which said: So, build a shadow box. An old shoe-box works great. I keep mine around for eclipses. Should scale it up so I can watch sunspots. For a few bucks you can get a mylar-like sheet of Baader Solar Filter material. I used some to make a filter for my telescope and looked at the sun directly, rather than by projection. Had to give it up, though, since the telescope was a reflector and I was getting sunburned over only the left side of my face. ------------- Beady's 11th Law of Social Harmonics: "Your spouse is precisely the kind of person someone like you would choose to marry." |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Beaderstadt" wrote in message ... I was getting sunburned over only the left side of my face. That happened to me once, but it was after a champagne breakfast at uni. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 09:37:54 GMT, John Beaderstadt
wrote: I was getting sunburned over only the left side of my face. ....Then quit following those UFOs with the window down :-P\ OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIAA: "SAFE LAUNCHES FOR CEV" | rk | Space Shuttle | 1 | June 20th 04 06:44 PM |
No safe haven at Hubble.... | Blurrt | Space Shuttle | 20 | May 10th 04 06:37 PM |
ISS Safe Haven | John Doe | Space Station | 0 | January 27th 04 09:47 AM |
Astronomers Measure Distance to Well-Known Star | [email protected] | Policy | 1 | January 22nd 04 04:55 PM |
earth-sun distance and heat involved | Beto | Science | 5 | October 2nd 03 05:43 AM |