![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For imaging so low on the horizon, we had some rather steady and good seeing
last night. I decided to try pretty much every option for planetary imaging that I have with my scope and toucam 740k (a new firewire DBK should be here Tuesday). The 2 set image was shot with a 2x barlow and 10fps. Pretty much the standard setting. The 3 set image was shot with a 3x barlow and 5fps. That would be a setting normally used for excellent seeing. The 5 set image was shot with a 2x barlow at 5fps. If I could of shot more frames with the 3x5fps, I'm sure it would of yielded the best result. But, given I only have about 2 minutes before the rotation of Jupiter comes into play, I had a bare minimum number of frames to work with. The DBK will resolve that problem hopefully. It was quite a challenge trying to get each set to match up in color, contrast, noise, etc. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() J.Warren wrote: For imaging so low on the horizon, we had some rather steady and good seeing last night. I decided to try pretty much every option for planetary imaging that I have with my scope and toucam 740k (a new firewire DBK should be here Tuesday). The 2 set image was shot with a 2x barlow and 10fps. Pretty much the standard setting. The 3 set image was shot with a 3x barlow and 5fps. That would be a setting normally used for excellent seeing. The 5 set image was shot with a 2x barlow at 5fps. If I could of shot more frames with the 3x5fps, I'm sure it would of yielded the best result. But, given I only have about 2 minutes before the rotation of Jupiter comes into play, I had a bare minimum number of frames to work with. The DBK will resolve that problem hopefully. It was quite a challenge trying to get each set to match up in color, contrast, noise, etc. Well done. It's really in the soup for me at 47N. Your shots show it better than I can see it visually in a very good 10" F/8 Cave from the late 50's. My attempts at matching frames has been a total failure. You did a great job. Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well done, nice pics
Kev "J.Warren" wrote in message ... For imaging so low on the horizon, we had some rather steady and good seeing last night. I decided to try pretty much every option for planetary imaging that I have with my scope and toucam 740k (a new firewire DBK should be here Tuesday). The 2 set image was shot with a 2x barlow and 10fps. Pretty much the standard setting. The 3 set image was shot with a 3x barlow and 5fps. That would be a setting normally used for excellent seeing. The 5 set image was shot with a 2x barlow at 5fps. If I could of shot more frames with the 3x5fps, I'm sure it would of yielded the best result. But, given I only have about 2 minutes before the rotation of Jupiter comes into play, I had a bare minimum number of frames to work with. The DBK will resolve that problem hopefully. It was quite a challenge trying to get each set to match up in color, contrast, noise, etc. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty impressive for It being down so low right now.
Joe "J.Warren" wrote in message ... For imaging so low on the horizon, we had some rather steady and good seeing last night. I decided to try pretty much every option for planetary imaging that I have with my scope and toucam 740k (a new firewire DBK should be here Tuesday). The 2 set image was shot with a 2x barlow and 10fps. Pretty much the standard setting. The 3 set image was shot with a 3x barlow and 5fps. That would be a setting normally used for excellent seeing. The 5 set image was shot with a 2x barlow at 5fps. If I could of shot more frames with the 3x5fps, I'm sure it would of yielded the best result. But, given I only have about 2 minutes before the rotation of Jupiter comes into play, I had a bare minimum number of frames to work with. The DBK will resolve that problem hopefully. It was quite a challenge trying to get each set to match up in color, contrast, noise, etc. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks guys. Yea, if it was about 20 degrees higher, the quality of those
images would of improved greatly. Below is the best capture from that night, and a gif I made showing the GRS rotating into darkness. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whoops, I posted the wrong gif. Here are the same frames, but better
processing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASTRO: getting my feet wet - first pics - 4 attachments (1/3) | Rick Johnson[_2_] | Astro Pictures | 0 | August 6th 07 05:56 AM |
Astro: Pics | Starlord | Astro Pictures | 0 | February 6th 07 09:37 PM |
Astro: Mercury, Jupiter, Mars Conjunction Series | Edward Erbeck | Astro Pictures | 5 | December 16th 06 09:14 PM |
throughout the World Series -- the Sun, Mercury, Mars, Venus, and Jupiter are all in compelling Scorpio | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | October 31st 06 03:49 AM |
re, best camera for astro pics | pete | UK Astronomy | 0 | November 6th 03 07:11 PM |