![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed the substantial
reduction in number of pages per issue of Sky & Telescope; 102 vs 150 a year ago. Anyone heard why? Jay |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sky Pub was bought out last year. You have to figure that any change is
going to be for the worse, with bean counters taking over. Stuart Goldman or someone is going to come on here and deny it, probably, but buyouts almost always result in cost-cutting and cheapening the product. -- Curtis Croulet Temecula, California 33°27'59"N, 117°05'53"W |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 8:49 pm, "Curtis Croulet"
wrote: Sky Pub was bought out last year. You have to figure that any change is going to be for the worse, with bean counters taking over. Stuart Goldman or someone is going to come on here and deny it, probably, but buyouts almost always result in cost-cutting and cheapening the product. -- Curtis Croulet Temecula, California 33°27'59"N, 117°05'53"W I believe this was discussed on Astromart recently. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 6:34 pm, "Jay" wrote:
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed the substantial reduction in number of pages per issue of Sky & Telescope; 102 vs 150 a year ago. Anyone heard why? Jay This is hardly news. It's economics, as always. The cover price of the magazine covers the cost of paper, printing and distribution. Advertising pays for actually having something to print on that paper. More ads = more material. Less ads = less material. Web content may affect this too: several magazines I read have shifted particulary time-sensitive material from the printed magazine to their web pages. The size change was before the buyout, BTW. If you're that concerned, why not ask S&T yourself? But check your back issues: I think there may have been an editorial about it, about the time of the last design/format change. Laura Halliday VE7LDH "That's a totally illegal, Grid: CN89mg madcap scheme. I like it!" ICBM: 49 16.05 N 122 56.92 W - H. Pearce |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 9:34 pm, "Jay" wrote:
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed the substantial reduction in number of pages per issue of Sky & Telescope; 102 vs 150 a year ago. Anyone heard why? Jay How about Stephen James O'Meara showing up at Astronomy recently? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Curtis Croulet wrote:
Sky Pub was bought out last year. You have to figure that any change is going to be for the worse, with bean counters taking over. Stuart Goldman or someone is going to come on here and deny it, probably, but buyouts almost always result in cost-cutting and cheapening the product. Not really. S&T was purchased because it is a cash cow, and any buyer would do nothing to change that. Any possible changes would occur in staff rather than product. Also, this is the May issue, delivered in March, and that is not the peak season for sales. Also, the telescope business has slowed recently. Last, Meade has been involved in an expensive lawsuit so it has cut back noticeably. Bob Schmall street cred: former ad manager at Astronomy, still in touch |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also, the telescope business has slowed recently.
Actually, it's been tough for several years now. And it'll likely get worse. -- Curtis Croulet Temecula, California 33°27'59"N, 117°05'53"W |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 9:34 pm, "Jay" wrote:
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed the substantial reduction in number of pages per issue of Sky & Telescope; 102 vs 150 a year ago. Anyone heard why? Jay I haven't looked at S&T lately, but in the 90's the mag seemed to run slightly over 100 pages, while 10 years later it was typically 150 pages or so. Has the amount of content been reduced recently or are there fewer ads too? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Curtis Croulet wrote:
Also, the telescope business has slowed recently. Actually, it's been tough for several years now. And it'll likely get worse. That would qualify as "recently". Why do you think it will get worse? Bob |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Schmall wrote in
: business has slowed recently. Last, Meade has been involved in an expensive lawsuit so it has cut back noticeably. Was it that expensive? Seems a lot of the claims have been dismissed quickly. Meade has known better days, that's sure http://www.digipills.com/tinylink/?YlKKM0oiIw -- Pierre Vandevenne - DataRescue sa/nv - www.datarescue.com The IDA Pro Disassembler & Debugger - world leader in hostile code analysis PhotoRescue - advanced data recovery for digital photographic media latest review: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1590497,00.asp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|