Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?

Now we have the secondary or backup plan-B as our faith based
alternative, such as lord/wizard "dan@" in full support of their
singular BIG-BANG holy grail, of such Old Testament thumping folks
claiming and/or perhaps as a Jewish form of ranting on behalf of an
electromagnetic or galactic black hole magnetosphere analogy "The
galaxy is a zero point machine producing mass, energy and spawns new
galaxies from vacuum energy", as being in charge of their forever
expanding universe that's somehow limited as to being their "one
endless universe", and thereby obviously representing the one and only
such universe in their mostly Old Testament certified town. The jest
of their analogy or rant on behalf of such magnetic energy being a
stronger than or at least of equal force to that of gravity, of which
I obviously don't exactly buy into because, it simply isn't cosure
within the regular laws of their own physics, nor can this otherwise
be forced via lab substantiations any better off than physics or
independent replicated science can support our having walked on the
moon, or for that matter of our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) having
claimed Islamics or whatever weird postal going Muslims actually had
any of those pesky WMD at their disposal, much less having the intent
to have used such WMD simply because we're so good at having been
keeping such nonjewish folks in such a nifty servitude or nearly slave
like existence, while we manage to suck down most of their energy
resources like there's no tomorrow, and at the same time deny their
access to utilizing nuclear derived energy.

At least the few and far between honest likes of "malibu" are still
sharing in common sense that also works entirely within the regular
laws of physics.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...5cbe54bb01c5d9
Galaxies do not grow any more than atoms
grow (i.e. in extreme fusion events).
Galaxies do not beget galaxies any more than
atoms beget atoms. It takes extreme energy
events to produce both and these happen only
in certain places in the Universe.

Another nifty tidbit of information that's worth our knowing about.
http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2000/v4641/
"Scientists have discovered the closest black hole yet, a mere 1,600
light years from Earth. Its discovery was heralded by four of the most
dramatic rapid X-ray intensity changes ever seen from one star."

The mass of that black hole, if it were instead to be compared as
being merely equal to whatever the entire Sirius star/(solar system)
plus its Kuiper belt and Oort cloud of combined gravitational
influence upon us amounts to, would as such need to become 34,596 fold
greater than the total worth of all that's Sirius, or roughly 103,788
times worthy of greater mass than the sum total of our wussy little
solar system. Fortunately, it is simply not anywhere nearly as
massive as it would need to be.

"In galaxy-core quasars, the black holes are millions of times more
massive than the Sun; in the more nearby microquasars the black holes
are roughly three to twenty times more massive than the Sun."

Twenty fold worth of solar mass units simply isn't hardly worth all
that much potential influence at 1,600 light years from our sol. The
nearby black hole or microquasar of V4641 at 8.73 ~ 11.70 solar mass
simply isn't worthy of most any given argument with respect to such a
minor black hole mass having an influence upon our meager existence,
that is unless the microquasar magnetosphere was at least a million
fold more robust per given density of its stellar like mass, than
otherwise being the likely case. So, that pretty much leaves us stuck
with and/or as having been influenced by the likes of the nearly 3X
massive and otherwise absolutely terrific energy worth of the
extremely nearby Sirius star/solar system.

There's more than enough gravity existing between sol and Sirius to
being measurable, and there's enough greater combined mass and thereby
force of gravity associated with Sirius in order to insure that we're
the ones being pulled along and doing the orbiting, such as once every
105,000 ~ 110,000 some odd years at this galactic time (our having
more frequent orbital cycles as we go back in time).

Unfortunately, the Sirius star/solar system is sequestered deep within
this mostly anti-think-tank naysay land, of Usenet banishment or
simply of whatever evidence exclusion accomplishes the trick of
keeping that mainstream good ship LOLLIPOP of theirs from excessively
rocking.

There's not all that much question that our many ice ages and
subsequent thawing cycles had been directly related to our orbiting of
Sirius, with the minor exception as having been taking place from the
very last ice age and ongoing thaw this Earth will ever see, as being
primarily due to our having obtained that nifty but rather GW trauma
causing moon, of which its lithobraking arrival is what also managed
to force mother Earth out of a somewhat elliptical moduated monoseason
with merely a solar forced tide, and ever since into having a rather
good deal of seasonal tilt and somewhat terrific moon forced tides
(especially at first).
-
Brad Guth