Summary of Theory of Everything

I have been working to develop a mechanically based Theory of
Everything. I have summarized my ideas in a new web page located at:

http://www.geocites.com/franklinhu/onetheory.html

This is the contents of this new web site:

The Theory of Everything Summary:

Physics isn't complicated. In this one document, many unexplained
physical phenomenon we observe will be explained in one simple
mechanically based model. This is not a proof of these concepts, but
rather sets the stage for showing how complex phenomenon like gravity,
magnetism, and electrostatics are all linked together in a single
model which is so beautiful, it must be true. This document only
contains a summary. For more information, see my complete theory at:
http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/theory.html

1. What is the universe made up of?
The universe is fundamentally only made up of 2 particles. These
particles are the electron and the positron. All observable particles
in the universe are some combination of only these 2 particles. This
is why we have never seen a particle with a fractional charge. It
simply cannot happen.

2. The behavior of electrons and positrons.
Electrons and positrons are particles of finite size which act like
bells in that when they are struck, they ring out with a specific tone
or frequency. The frequency of both electrons and positrons is the
same, but are out of phase from one another by 180 degrees.

3. How force attraction works.
Since the waves from electrons and positrons are out of phase, this
means that when the wave from an electron meets the wave from a
positron, the waves cancel and create a region of low pressure between
them. This creates a force of attraction between them. .If a wave from
an electron meets a wave from another electron, they add up and create
an area of higher pressure between them. This creates a force of
repulsion. It has been shown experimentally and mathematically that
the force follows a 1/r^2 law and is consistent with the behavior of
the electrostatic force. This attraction/repulsion caused by phase
interaction is the fundamental force behind all non-contact forces.

4. What fills space?
Since electrons and positrons are attracted to one another, they
immediately form pairs in space. In fact, all of space is completely
filled with these electron/positron pairs and this forms the medium
through which the waves generated by the resonant frequency of the
positrons and electrons is transmitted. This forms what has been
classically described as the aether made up of particles.

5. What are protons?
Protons are actually made up of 2 positrons and an electron. This
leaves the proton with a +1 positive charge. It is very different from
the electron since it is made up of 3 particles and the electron is
only made up of 1.

6. What is mass?
Since each aether particle is made up of a positive/negative charge,
these form dipoles like tiny magnets. These dipoles tend to stick
together like magnets. It takes energy to pull these aether particles
apart. Mass is actually a measure of how hard it is to push and object
though the aether particles by breaking the bonds between the aether
particles. Like pushing an object through molasses, the larger the
object, the more difficult it is to push the object through. Protons
being composed of 3 objects are much bigger physically and more
complex than the electron. In fact it takes 1800 times as much energy
to push a proton through the aether, than it does to push a single
electron through the aether. This explains what we mean by mass and
why the proton and electron have such large mass differences.

7. What is inertia?
As object move through the aether, they need energy to break the bond
in front of them, however, as the object passes through, the bonds are
reformed behind the object and actually push it forward like a pea
stuck between 2 round magnets. In this way, once an object is put into
motion, it stays in motion because the energy used to move it forward
is immediately returned back to it as the aether behind the object
closes up. This explains Newton's first law.

8. What are atoms?
Atoms are formed out of protons which have a +1 positive charge. The
structure of positrons and electrons is such that 2 positrons can
closely combine with a single electron, but not 2. As such, the proton
loosely attracts a -1 charge electron. The electron does not orbit the
positive charge, it is simply stuck onto the proton like two magnets
might stick together. In larger atoms, electrons take their place
alongside their matching protons in a kind of checkboard pattern. Due
to symmetry requirements, the atom typically captures an aether
particle into its matrix. We recognize these imbedded particles as
neutrons.

9. What causes chemical reactions?
As protons/electrons/neutrons gather together in atoms, they form a
specific geometric shape corresponding to the most stable arrangement.
Generally, atoms form octahedral shapes with pointy vertices. These
shapes expose particular parts of the atom to form docking ports for
other atoms. Atoms can then link together physically like tinkertoys
at particular angles and bonding strengths.

10. What causes light spectra?
When you energize an atom, it produces light of very specific
frequencies instead of a wide band of frequencies. The reason why it
does this is because space is made up of particles and a particle
within space can only move fixed distances corresponding to the width
of an aether particle. So an electron can only be an integer multiple
of 1, 2, 3 ... distance away from the proton. As such, the energy
states it can be in are extremely limited, and so the light that is
produced from an electron bouncing around a proton is also extremely
limited and ends up producing very narrow sets of frequency bands.

11. What causes the exchange between mass and energy?
All atomic energy release is due to either the formation or
destruction of the bond between the positron/electron bond within the
aether particle. Normal matter (a positron and electron) can be
produced seemingly out of nowhere with the application of sufficient
amounts of energy. In reality, the positron and electron were always
there in the background of the aether. There is no magical creation of
matter. Neither is mass converted into energy when a positron reacts
with an electron. It simply is converted into an aether particle where
it hides undetectable in the background. Mass and energy are always
conserved.

12. Why does E=mc^2?
It turns out that the energy required to break the aether bond
requires that you accelerate the positron and electron to the speed of
light. The amount of energy required follows the kinetic energy law of
E = 1/2 mv^2 where v=velocity is equal to the speed of light c. So the
energy required to break the bond is 1/2mc^2 for the positron +
1/2mc^2 for the electron which trivially adds up to E=mc^2. From a
conservation of energy standpoint, when the bond is reformed by a
positron and electron to form an aether particle, the energy released
back into the environment is also E=mc^2.

13. What causes the Earth electric field?
The structure of the proton and electron are extremely different Since
the proton is +1 charge and the electron -1 charge, you would expect
that their charges would completely cancel out. But because the proton
and electron are structured so differently or because the electron is
bound so loosely to the atom, the proton winds up taking a slight
advantage over the electron and their charge do not completely cancel
out. Any sufficiently large amount of mass ends up with a slightly
positive charge wave coming out of it. The cumulative effects of this
slight charge displacement over the size of an object the size of the
Earth are massive. This winds up generating a massive positive
electrostatic field at ground level. This electric field is the source
for thunderstorm activity and also a significant factor in the
generation of the Earth's magnetic field.

14. What causes gravity?
Gravity is simply caused by the electrostatic force. If you assume
that a tiny (10^-40) asymmentry exists between the proton and electron
charge and you apply Columbs law in a straight forward manner, you can
account for the force that we call gravity. This is a fully all
attractive force that follows the gravitational equations.

15. What is dark matter?
Since all of space is filled with aether particles which are made up
of normal mass, it ends up contributing a massive amount to the force
of gravity present in space. However, since it is everywhere, the
force pulls in all directions which effectively neutralizes the
aether's contribution to the gravity force. The only way the force of
gravity from the aether can be felt is in areas of space which are
denser than others. The denser area will act as if it contained the
same amount of visible matter as the difference in density between the
two areas. So dark matter is actually just made up of dense aether.

16. Why does dark matter hang around normal matter?
It is observed that dark matter tends to accumulate around normal
visible matter. The reason for this is that normal matter generates
gravity. Since the aether is very much like normal mass, it is
attracted to any source of gravity and is compressed by it. Therefore,
anywhere you see normal mass, you also see the effects of the
compressed and denser aether around it.

17. Why doesn't dark matter hang around the center of galaxies?
It has been observed that while dark matter is associated with matter,
it is not present in areas of high matter density like the center of
galaxies. The reason has to do with uniformity. At the center of the
galaxy, there is a lot of mass producing a pretty uniform
gravitational field in all directions. Since the field pulls in all
directions, any density effect you might get is also neutralized. The
best place to see dark matter is in areas which are relatively
sparsely populated with pinpoint gravitational sources. This produces
an almost inverse relationship between the real matter density and the
contribution that dark matter makes.

18. What causes magnetism?
The magnetic field is simply an alignment of the aether. The aether
dipoles are randomly arranged when no magnetic field is present, but
are all aligned into a single direction when a magnetic field is
present. This alignment is achieved by the combing of the field by
passing electrons. This is the fundamental connection between moving
charges and the formation of the magnetic field. You get magnetic
repulsion when the fields which are oriented in the same direction
interact and you get attraction when the fields are oriented in the
opposite direction. The basic attraction/replusion mechanism is still
electrostatic.

19. What causes Earth's magnetic field?
The Earth electric field creates a moving sea of ionized air. This
ionized air carries charges and is effectively a conductor of
electricity. Since the jet stream primarily moves west to east, this
is like a wire wrapped around the Earth with a current which moves
west to east. Such a current would generate a magnet with the magnetic
poles oriented as we currently observe. So the moving atmosphere
creates the Earth's magnetic fields. There is evidence indicating that
when the winds shift from east to west, that this causes the poles to
flip.

fhutoe

This link to the web site was incorrect. This is the correct link.

http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/onetheory.html

On Apr 2, 12:55 am, wrote:
I have been working to develop a mechanically based Theory of
Everything. I have summarized my ideas in a new web page located at:

http://www.geocites.com/franklinhu/onetheory.html

This is the contents of this new web site:

The Theory of Everything Summary:

Physics isn't complicated.

No, but it is much stranger than you think. There are a number of
experiments that indicate that the simple, intuitive model that you
would like is simply ruled out.

In this one document, many unexplained
physical phenomenon we observe will be explained in one simple
mechanically based model. This is not a proof of these concepts, but
rather sets the stage for showing how complex phenomenon like gravity,
magnetism, and electrostatics are all linked together in a single
model which is so beautiful, it must be true. This document only
contains a summary. For more information, see my complete theory at:http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/theory.html

Unfortunately, even your corrected link shows that the theory fails in
one really important aspect. You can't calculate anything with it. As
such, it can't be tested in a way that distinguishes it from other
models.

I would like to reiterate to you something that I've told you befo
A model that is conceptually simpler (in your estimation) than an
existing theory will NOT replace the existing theory unless it can do
the following things:
- Make *quantitative* predictions of measurable quantitites that are
not presently predictable with the existing theory.
- Predict a behavior that is clearly ruled out by an existing theory,
and then that behavior is later found to happen in nature.

It doesn't matter HOW elegant and simple and intuitive you think the
model is. If you can't calculate with it, and if it doesn't predict
things that the current theory does not predict, then your model is
simply useless. Period. Sorry, but that's the case.

I'll only address a couple of your points below.


1. What is the universe made up of?
The universe is fundamentally only made up of 2 particles. These
particles are the electron and the positron. All observable particles
in the universe are some combination of only these 2 particles. This
is why we have never seen a particle with a fractional charge. It
simply cannot happen.

Unfortunately, the scattering centers inside a proton *have* been
unambiguously associated with *measured* charge of 1/3 and 2/3 through
Coulomb scattering. In Coulomb scattering, one can *measure* the
charge of the object doing the scattering, whether it is seen outside
the proton or not.


2. The behavior of electrons and positrons.
Electrons and positrons are particles of finite size which act like
bells in that when they are struck, they ring out with a specific tone
or frequency. The frequency of both electrons and positrons is the
same, but are out of phase from one another by 180 degrees.

This explains little. For example, the current model can explain the
angular distribution of electron-positron pair creation from gammas.
Can yours?

[snip]


14. What causes gravity?
Gravity is simply caused by the electrostatic force. If you assume
that a tiny (10^-40) asymmentry exists between the proton and electron
charge and you apply Columbs law in a straight forward manner, you can
account for the force that we call gravity. This is a fully all
attractive force that follows the gravitational equations.

You will note a problem here. Since the Earth is made of proton and
electrons, then a tiny charge asymmetry will produce a net charge of
one sign, as you say. However, the Moon is also made of protons and
electrons, and the same charge asymmetry will produce a net charge of
the same sign as the Earth. In your scenario, the Earth and the Moon
would then have the same sign of net charge, and if you recall
Coulomb's law, like charges repel. Thus you would predict that the
Earth repels the Moon, not attracts it.

To account for attraction via Coulomb's law, you would have to explain
how it is that the Moon and the Earth acquire opposite charge.
Likewise, you would also have to explain how the Sun and the Earth
acquire opposite charge. You will also note that it is difficult to
arrange the Sun and the Earth and the Moon all to have opposite
charges, so that at least one of those pairs would have to repel each
other, which is counter to experiment.

PD

[snip]

wrote:
[snip crap]

The Theory of Everything Summary:

Physics isn't complicated.
[snip more crap]

Then you are wrong. Calculate and post the incremental gravitational
field internal to a homogeneous isotropic thin spherical shell. Now
do it for the general case of any location within a three-axis
ellipsoid. Show us how "physics isn't complicated."

1. What is the universe made up of?
The universe is fundamentally only made up of 2 particles. These
particles are the electron and the positron. All observable particles
in the universe are some combination of only these 2 particles. This
is why we have never seen a particle with a fractional charge. It
simply cannot happen.
[snip rest of crap]

Leptons, bosons, quarks; leptons vs. baryons; field quantization;
conservation laws; Bullet Galaxy and dark matter. Empirical Idiot.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is
just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by
really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept.

If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a
fundamental property of"

Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying.

You are saying it is a decree.

And if you are decreeing that a thing is, just is and we must accept
that it is, then perhaps you haven't examined it enough yet.

Lets suppose I say, well no good sir, it is not charge, fundamentally
it is fairies.
That was the original decree, fairy magic.

Fairy magic is a fundamental aspect of the universe, and we must just
accept that it is.

We must start with that precept and go on from there.

It is the fairy magic, which endows an electron with its charge.

And also likewise it endows the positron, with its positive charge.

This attraction being just its nature.

My point is this.

An electron, is not what it appears to be. At the time that people
came up with the idea of charge, a charge of powder in a cannon they
didn't know much about atomic processes.

The idea that one thing can just have this invisible quality, that
makes it negative and another invisible quality that makes another
positive, means that it has some special gifted property or some
decreed behavior or some sort of quality for the purpose of
accomplishing some thing, rather than just being that way for itself.

A negative charge would be useless without a positive charge existing
also in the universe. And then you might as well say that the universe
was made by design.
And if so, then that is quite simple to say that God made electrons
negative and positrons positive and we dare not ask why or what it is
in its true essence.

It has a quality that effects a result.

It is such a difficult thing to explain why it is just plain wrong.

I just don't believe, that an electron, can be told, to just be
negative by decree.

I do not buy into the idea of it as being just that way fundamentally,
like it has a special unique quality to it that we must accept on
blind faith.

If, some giant alien or God created the universe, and put some liquid
in the void, and flipped a switch, and it inflated until it filled
with foam, ok, I can buy into that. I can accept that the universe is
merely governed by forces and at its root, is this quantum foam which
keeps it together by its own tensile strength.

You see the problem with physic today, is they have a fixation on
electricity.

And hence try to explain the entire universe with concepts such as
charge. Yet charge does not affect absolute space-time.
Only mass does.
So your electron without mass, is going to have a difficult time,
affecting a nucleus which has mass.
And gravity which can affect mass, has only one pole.

Anyways the point I wanted to make was simply to ask yourself about
charge, and what it might be, and if you arrive at the conclusion that
it is a fundamental property, a magic property, then think of
something more tangible. Because it that is magic and by decree by God
then it might as well all be.

On Apr 2, 6:19 pm, wrote:
There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is
just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by
really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept.

If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a
fundamental property of"

Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying.

You are saying it is a decree.

And if you are decreeing that a thing is, just is and we must accept
that it is, then perhaps you haven't examined it enough yet.

Lets suppose I say, well no good sir, it is not charge, fundamentally
it is fairies.
That was the original decree, fairy magic.

Fairy magic is a fundamental aspect of the universe, and we must just
accept that it is.

We must start with that precept and go on from there.

It is the fairy magic, which endows an electron with its charge.

And also likewise it endows the positron, with its positive charge.

This attraction being just its nature.

My point is this.

An electron, is not what it appears to be. At the time that people
came up with the idea of charge, a charge of powder in a cannon they
didn't know much about atomic processes.

The idea that one thing can just have this invisible quality, that
makes it negative and another invisible quality that makes another
positive, means that it has some special gifted property or some
decreed behavior or some sort of quality for the purpose of
accomplishing some thing, rather than just being that way for itself.

A negative charge would be useless without a positive charge existing
also in the universe. And then you might as well say that the universe
was made by design.
And if so, then that is quite simple to say that God made electrons
negative and positrons positive and we dare not ask why or what it is
in its true essence.

It has a quality that effects a result.

It is such a difficult thing to explain why it is just plain wrong.

I just don't believe, that an electron, can be told, to just be
negative by decree.

I do not buy into the idea of it as being just that way fundamentally,
like it has a special unique quality to it that we must accept on
blind faith.

If, some giant alien or God created the universe, and put some liquid
in the void, and flipped a switch, and it inflated until it filled
with foam, ok, I can buy into that. I can accept that the universe is
merely governed by forces and at its root, is this quantum foam which
keeps it together by its own tensile strength.

You see the problem with physic today, is they have a fixation on
electricity.

And hence try to explain the entire universe with concepts such as
charge. Yet charge does not affect absolute space-time.
Only mass does.
So your electron without mass, is going to have a difficult time,
affecting a nucleus which has mass.
And gravity which can affect mass, has only one pole.

Anyways the point I wanted to make was simply to ask yourself about
charge, and what it might be, and if you arrive at the conclusion that
it is a fundamental property, a magic property, then think of
something more tangible. Because it that is magic and by decree by God
then it might as well all be.

I just do not believe that an electron is anything more, than a
spherical wave in the ether.

The idea, that it is a little substance, with mass, rotating around a
nucleus, is just pure fantasy.

What could possibly keep it in orbit and hasn't that been thrown out
as a half baked idea?

The only thing, that could keep a little substance like that rotating
around a nucleus is fairy magic.

An electron is a spread out smeared out thing.

The standard model uses the idea of a point particle, to freeze the
frame and study points,
that does not endow a bit of energy, a wave crest, with any substance.

It is absolute space-time, which moves around and waves travel through
it.
Like frame dragging or lensing.

So it is easy to be mislead, into thinking that if the trajectory
curves, it must be because it has mass and is being affected by
gravity.
That is like saying a photon curves around the sun because of gravity.
Gravity is exerting a pull on that photon.
Well thats not the case. The photon is traveling in space-time and
space-time is being affected by gravity.
And the EM spectrum includes all things electrical and magnetic
including electrons.
They are no different than a photon. And a photon has no mass.

On Apr 2, 10:19 am, wrote:
There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is
just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by
really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept.

If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a
fundamental property of"

Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying.

You are saying it is a decree.

No, no. All Uncle Al is saying is that any theory that claims to
replace some current one must be at least AS GOOD which simply means:
it must predict all the experimental results the old theory predicted.
Uncle A. posted a sample list of results any new theory must predict
or else it's just hand waving.

--
Jan Bielawski

"JanPB" wrote in message oups.com...
On Apr 2, 10:19 am, wrote:
There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is
just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by
really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept.

If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a
fundamental property of"

Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying.

You are saying it is a decree.

No, no. All Uncle Al is saying is that any theory that claims to
replace some current one must be at least AS GOOD

Uncle Stooopid is a ****in' dickhead, like you, only he's
the biggest tord in the river of ****.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...leStooopid.htm

Androcles wrote:

"JanPB" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Apr 2, 10:19 am, wrote:
There is this thing that physicists have regarding charge, that is
just such an ingrained concept, from the standard model, that only by
really asking yourself what is charge, can you get past that concept.

If, in your analysis of charge, you end up with "Well it is a
fundamental property of"

Then stop and analyze what you are actually saying.

You are saying it is a decree.

No, no. All Uncle Al is saying is that any theory that claims to
replace some current one must be at least AS GOOD

Uncle Stooopid is a ****in' dickhead, like you, only he's
the biggest tord in the river of ****.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...leStooopid.htm

How would you know? Don't you have him safely plonked?

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert

I doubt you can do that mechanically, franklin!

It's rather obvious that you don't know any physics.

Saul Levy


On 1 Apr 2007 22:55:44 -0700, wrote:

I have been working to develop a mechanically based Theory of
Everything. I have summarized my ideas in a new web page located at:

http://www.geocites.com/franklinhu/onetheory.html

This is the contents of this new web site:

The Theory of Everything Summary:

Physics isn't complicated. In this one document, many unexplained
physical phenomenon we observe will be explained in one simple
mechanically based model. This is not a proof of these concepts, but
rather sets the stage for showing how complex phenomenon like gravity,
magnetism, and electrostatics are all linked together in a single
model which is so beautiful, it must be true. This document only
contains a summary. For more information, see my complete theory at:
http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/theory.html

1. What is the universe made up of?
The universe is fundamentally only made up of 2 particles. These
particles are the electron and the positron. All observable particles
in the universe are some combination of only these 2 particles. This
is why we have never seen a particle with a fractional charge. It
simply cannot happen.

2. The behavior of electrons and positrons.
Electrons and positrons are particles of finite size which act like
bells in that when they are struck, they ring out with a specific tone
or frequency. The frequency of both electrons and positrons is the
same, but are out of phase from one another by 180 degrees.

3. How force attraction works.
Since the waves from electrons and positrons are out of phase, this
means that when the wave from an electron meets the wave from a
positron, the waves cancel and create a region of low pressure between
them. This creates a force of attraction between them. .If a wave from
an electron meets a wave from another electron, they add up and create
an area of higher pressure between them. This creates a force of
repulsion. It has been shown experimentally and mathematically that
the force follows a 1/r^2 law and is consistent with the behavior of
the electrostatic force. This attraction/repulsion caused by phase
interaction is the fundamental force behind all non-contact forces.

4. What fills space?
Since electrons and positrons are attracted to one another, they
immediately form pairs in space. In fact, all of space is completely
filled with these electron/positron pairs and this forms the medium
through which the waves generated by the resonant frequency of the
positrons and electrons is transmitted. This forms what has been
classically described as the aether made up of particles.

5. What are protons?
Protons are actually made up of 2 positrons and an electron. This
leaves the proton with a +1 positive charge. It is very different from
the electron since it is made up of 3 particles and the electron is
only made up of 1.

6. What is mass?
Since each aether particle is made up of a positive/negative charge,
these form dipoles like tiny magnets. These dipoles tend to stick
together like magnets. It takes energy to pull these aether particles
apart. Mass is actually a measure of how hard it is to push and object
though the aether particles by breaking the bonds between the aether
particles. Like pushing an object through molasses, the larger the
object, the more difficult it is to push the object through. Protons
being composed of 3 objects are much bigger physically and more
complex than the electron. In fact it takes 1800 times as much energy
to push a proton through the aether, than it does to push a single
electron through the aether. This explains what we mean by mass and
why the proton and electron have such large mass differences.

7. What is inertia?
As object move through the aether, they need energy to break the bond
in front of them, however, as the object passes through, the bonds are
reformed behind the object and actually push it forward like a pea
stuck between 2 round magnets. In this way, once an object is put into
motion, it stays in motion because the energy used to move it forward
is immediately returned back to it as the aether behind the object
closes up. This explains Newton's first law.

8. What are atoms?
Atoms are formed out of protons which have a +1 positive charge. The
structure of positrons and electrons is such that 2 positrons can
closely combine with a single electron, but not 2. As such, the proton
loosely attracts a -1 charge electron. The electron does not orbit the
positive charge, it is simply stuck onto the proton like two magnets
might stick together. In larger atoms, electrons take their place
alongside their matching protons in a kind of checkboard pattern. Due
to symmetry requirements, the atom typically captures an aether
particle into its matrix. We recognize these imbedded particles as
neutrons.

9. What causes chemical reactions?
As protons/electrons/neutrons gather together in atoms, they form a
specific geometric shape corresponding to the most stable arrangement.
Generally, atoms form octahedral shapes with pointy vertices. These
shapes expose particular parts of the atom to form docking ports for
other atoms. Atoms can then link together physically like tinkertoys
at particular angles and bonding strengths.

10. What causes light spectra?
When you energize an atom, it produces light of very specific
frequencies instead of a wide band of frequencies. The reason why it
does this is because space is made up of particles and a particle
within space can only move fixed distances corresponding to the width
of an aether particle. So an electron can only be an integer multiple
of 1, 2, 3 ... distance away from the proton. As such, the energy
states it can be in are extremely limited, and so the light that is
produced from an electron bouncing around a proton is also extremely
limited and ends up producing very narrow sets of frequency bands.

11. What causes the exchange between mass and energy?
All atomic energy release is due to either the formation or
destruction of the bond between the positron/electron bond within the
aether particle. Normal matter (a positron and electron) can be
produced seemingly out of nowhere with the application of sufficient
amounts of energy. In reality, the positron and electron were always
there in the background of the aether. There is no magical creation of
matter. Neither is mass converted into energy when a positron reacts
with an electron. It simply is converted into an aether particle where
it hides undetectable in the background. Mass and energy are always
conserved.

12. Why does E=mc^2?
It turns out that the energy required to break the aether bond
requires that you accelerate the positron and electron to the speed of
light. The amount of energy required follows the kinetic energy law of
E = 1/2 mv^2 where v=velocity is equal to the speed of light c. So the
energy required to break the bond is 1/2mc^2 for the positron +
1/2mc^2 for the electron which trivially adds up to E=mc^2. From a
conservation of energy standpoint, when the bond is reformed by a
positron and electron to form an aether particle, the energy released
back into the environment is also E=mc^2.

13. What causes the Earth electric field?
The structure of the proton and electron are extremely different Since
the proton is +1 charge and the electron -1 charge, you would expect
that their charges would completely cancel out. But because the proton
and electron are structured so differently or because the electron is
bound so loosely to the atom, the proton winds up taking a slight
advantage over the electron and their charge do not completely cancel
out. Any sufficiently large amount of mass ends up with a slightly
positive charge wave coming out of it. The cumulative effects of this
slight charge displacement over the size of an object the size of the
Earth are massive. This winds up generating a massive positive
electrostatic field at ground level. This electric field is the source
for thunderstorm activity and also a significant factor in the
generation of the Earth's magnetic field.

14. What causes gravity?
Gravity is simply caused by the electrostatic force. If you assume
that a tiny (10^-40) asymmentry exists between the proton and electron
charge and you apply Columbs law in a straight forward manner, you can
account for the force that we call gravity. This is a fully all
attractive force that follows the gravitational equations.

15. What is dark matter?
Since all of space is filled with aether particles which are made up
of normal mass, it ends up contributing a massive amount to the force
of gravity present in space. However, since it is everywhere, the
force pulls in all directions which effectively neutralizes the
aether's contribution to the gravity force. The only way the force of
gravity from the aether can be felt is in areas of space which are
denser than others. The denser area will act as if it contained the
same amount of visible matter as the difference in density between the
two areas. So dark matter is actually just made up of dense aether.

16. Why does dark matter hang around normal matter?
It is observed that dark matter tends to accumulate around normal
visible matter. The reason for this is that normal matter generates
gravity. Since the aether is very much like normal mass, it is
attracted to any source of gravity and is compressed by it. Therefore,
anywhere you see normal mass, you also see the effects of the
compressed and denser aether around it.

17. Why doesn't dark matter hang around the center of galaxies?
It has been observed that while dark matter is associated with matter,
it is not present in areas of high matter density like the center of
galaxies. The reason has to do with uniformity. At the center of the
galaxy, there is a lot of mass producing a pretty uniform
gravitational field in all directions. Since the field pulls in all
directions, any density effect you might get is also neutralized. The
best place to see dark matter is in areas which are relatively
sparsely populated with pinpoint gravitational sources. This produces
an almost inverse relationship between the real matter density and the
contribution that dark matter makes.

18. What causes magnetism?
The magnetic field is simply an alignment of the aether. The aether
dipoles are randomly arranged when no magnetic field is present, but
are all aligned into a single direction when a magnetic field is
present. This alignment is achieved by the combing of the field by
passing electrons. This is the fundamental connection between moving
charges and the formation of the magnetic field. You get magnetic
repulsion when the fields which are oriented in the same direction
interact and you get attraction when the fields are oriented in the
opposite direction. The basic attraction/replusion mechanism is still
electrostatic.

19. What causes Earth's magnetic field?
The Earth electric field creates a moving sea of ionized air. This
ionized air carries charges and is effectively a conductor of
electricity. Since the jet stream primarily moves west to east, this
is like a wire wrapped around the Earth with a current which moves
west to east. Such a current would generate a magnet with the magnetic
poles oriented as we currently observe. So the moving atmosphere
creates the Earth's magnetic fields. There is evidence indicating that
when the winds shift from east to west, that this causes the poles to
flip.

fhutoe