Why the Pringle Shape ???

Because it fits best for the shape of universes. They can be stacked
and only be a membrane away. It gives it a negative curve(I like that)
It gives the universe an unbounded area,and nature loves that. Bert

On 27/3/07 22:38, in article
, "G=EMC^2 Glazier"
wrote:

Because it fits best for the shape of universes. They can be stacked
and only be a membrane away. It gives it a negative curve(I like that)
It gives the universe an unbounded area,and nature loves that. Bert


The universe shows virtually zero curvature.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

On 27/3/07 23:23, in article , "Jade hasn't
said anything about this nym yet, except that she said that she said
something about it a long tyme ago..." wrote:

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

On 27/3/07 22:38, in article
, "G=EMC^2 Glazier"
wrote:

Because it fits best for the shape of universes. They can be stacked
and only be a membrane away. It gives it a negative curve(I like that)
It gives the universe an unbounded area,and nature loves that. Bert


The universe shows virtually zero curvature.


*shows* and *virtually* being the operative words, there.

Yep - as opposed to Beert's words which implied certainty. Failed basic
reading classes?


you seem to have doubts about your cackulations, phin-e-ass.

No scientist says anything with 100% certainty mopjockey.

As an aside, is this some sort of demonstration of your so called t0rlling
skills? It seems to reinforce the fact your awards are well deserved.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message
...
On 27/3/07 22:38, in article
, "G=EMC^2 Glazier"
wrote:

Because it fits best for the shape of universes. They can be stacked
and only be a membrane away. It gives it a negative curve(I like that)
It gives the universe an unbounded area,and nature loves that. Bert


The universe shows virtually zero curvature.


And you can see that from peering through Dickless' asshole ??
Who'd a thunk ....

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

On 27/3/07 22:38, in article
, "G=EMC^2 Glazier"
wrote:

Because it fits best for the shape of universes. They can be stacked
and only be a membrane away. It gives it a negative curve(I like that)
It gives the universe an unbounded area,and nature loves that. Bert


The universe shows virtually zero curvature.


*shows* and *virtually* being the operative words, there.

you seem to have doubts about your cackulations, phin-e-ass.

--
jade hasn't said anything about my new sig, either, except that she said
that she did.

Rob "Mop Jockey" "Roberta" Wolfe
OFISHIAL Benevolent Dictator of AUK
HAotM, ConT, dw:OPP, ASPCA , HAND, FOAD
http://netkooks.org/ofishialbenevole...or/picture.jpg
insert more imaginary titles here later


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On 27/3/07 23:39, in article , "Jade hasn't
said anything about this nym yet, except that she said that she said
something about it a long tyme ago..." wrote:

As an aside, is this some sort of demonstration of your so called t0rlling
skills? It seems to reinforce the fact your awards are well deserved.


i'm just glad that you admit to being uncertain about everything, i was
beginning to think you were a kook.

That's a weight off my mind.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

On 27/3/07 23:23, in article , "Jade hasn't
said anything about this nym yet, except that she said that she said
something about it a long tyme ago..." wrote:

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

On 27/3/07 22:38, in article
, "G=EMC^2 Glazier"
wrote:

Because it fits best for the shape of universes. They can be stacked
and only be a membrane away. It gives it a negative curve(I like that)
It gives the universe an unbounded area,and nature loves that. Bert


The universe shows virtually zero curvature.


*shows* and *virtually* being the operative words, there.

Yep - as opposed to Beert's words which implied certainty.

perhaps you just inferred uncertainty, seeing as how kooky it would be of
you to be telling other people what they "meant" when they said something.

Failed basic
reading classes?

i never had "basic reading classes", i was at a 6th grade reading level in
kindergarten.

and so you can't be so "uncertain" about it:

http://netkooks.org/mopjockey/docume.../iqtest_p3.jpg

HTH.



you seem to have doubts about your cackulations, phin-e-ass.

No scientist says anything with 100% certainty mopjockey.

As an aside, is this some sort of demonstration of your so called t0rlling
skills? It seems to reinforce the fact your awards are well deserved.


i'm just glad that you admit to being uncertain about everything, i was
beginning to think you were a kook.

--
jade hasn't said anything about my new sig, either, except that she said
that she did.

Rob "Mop Jockey" "Roberta" Wolfe
OFISHIAL Benevolent Dictator of AUK
HAotM, ConT, dw:OPP, ASPCA , HAND, FOAD
http://netkooks.org/ofishialbenevole...or/picture.jpg
insert more imaginary titles here later


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message
...
On 27/3/07 23:39, in article , "Jade hasn't
said anything about this nym yet, except that she said that she said
something about it a long tyme ago..." wrote:

As an aside, is this some sort of demonstration of your so called
t0rlling
skills? It seems to reinforce the fact your awards are well deserved.


i'm just glad that you admit to being uncertain about everything, i was
beginning to think you were a kook.

That's a weight off my mind.

What mind?

HJ

Does the universe taste like Pringle's too, BEERTbrain? It longs to
know!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:38:14 -0400, (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

Because it fits best for the shape of universes. They can be stacked
and only be a membrane away. It gives it a negative curve(I like that)
It gives the universe an unbounded area,and nature loves that. Bert

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
On 27/3/07 22:38, in article
, "G=EMC^2 Glazier"
wrote:

Because it fits best for the shape of universes. They can be stacked
and only be a membrane away. It gives it a negative curve(I like that)
It gives the universe an unbounded area,and nature loves that. Bert


The universe shows virtually zero curvature.


And I was so enjoying the security a strongly positive curve would
offer. I'm agorophobic.

--
When you do something right,
No one will know you did anything at all.

....attributed to 'God'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-nXT8lSnPQ

Usenet asshole #34
Most hetaed Usnetizen #40
British Leyland LitSlut #2

Try to keep your shirt on, OK?
We're supposed to be all grown up now.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com