![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oc Lots of stuff obeys the inverse square law besides gravity. EM
force,The diameter of a conducting wire etc Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...
in message ... oc Lots of stuff obeys the inverse square law besides gravity. EM force,The diameter of a conducting wire etc Bert Bert, you did it again!... Your little reminder up there made me go back and rethink the laws of thermodynamics. As you recall, the first law is all about conservation, and the second law is all about how energy loses its usefulness, energy deteriorates, disperses. Energy goes from "high grade" to "low grade". When we think about dispersion and obeying the inverse square law, and when we apply these only to the energies we know about, it's easy to accept the eventual... "heat death of the Universe" All energies eventually reach equilibrium. But not so according to Bill and Wolter! Spatial energy must be sort of an "ultra-high grade" energy that, by virtue of the 2nd law, seeks out the lower grade energies, the nuclear and EM and matter itself. It "deteriorates" and disperses into the known "high grade" energies, which then continue to disperse. And where do these go? Back into space! The ultra-high grade energy of space that causes the effect we call "gravity" reabsorbs the dispersed low grade energies and the cycle completes itself, the Universe goes on. There is no heat death. There will never be energy equilibrium on a Universal level. Replenishment is the key. The Universe goes on. ....and on... ....and on... ....and on... happy days and... starry starry nights! -- A secret of the Universe, So please don't breathe a word of this, The Moon Selene will smile perverse Whene'er she sees true lovers kiss-- Breathe not a single word of this. Indelibly yours, Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/ http://www.painellsworth.net |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 8:39 pm, "Painius" wrote:
There is no heat death. There will never be energy equilibrium on a Universal level. Replenishment is the key. The Universe goes on. ...and on... ...and on... ...and on... Yeah Paine, if you remember this was discussed here several years ago. It's a primary tenet of the CBB model. When the universe reaches the point of maximum expansion and enters the Contraction phase, that's the beginning of the onset of *reversal of entropy* at the universal level. It's illustrated here (you posted this page recently too) - http://community-2.webtv.net/oldcoot/ContinuousBigBang/ The perception of "ever-accelerating expansion" grew out of the 1a supernova data (circa 1996) which showed the most distant SN1a appearing 'dimmer than they should be'.. which was interpreted as evidence of accelerating expansion. That's the natural interpretation if space in indeed a 'void'. But if space is *not* a void but a universal, fluidic Plenum, it's gonna have a density gradient that shows up at deep cosmological distances, closer in to the BB (as shown on page 2). Light that began its journey in denser, 'hotter' space and propagated into 'our' less dense, 'cooler' space is naturally gonna lose amplitde and appear dimmer, just as is observed. And the expansion curve is shifted toward DEcelerating expansion and a closed universe (as mentioned many times over the years). This'll provoke a cacaphanous fusilade of noise from the usual contingent. Where you been engaging in tete-a-tetes with them at their own level, why not just stow 'em and forget 'em? The old adage "when you rassle with curs you get their fleas" is certainly applicable here. If you could bring yourself to ignore 'em you'd be rid of the "fleas". I have this tenant, an old lady with a scroungy, tiny mutt i call a 'pit yorkie'. The damn thing will go into fits of shrill yip-yapping till it's hoarse and gagging, as if from a prolapsed larynx. Its compulsive noise-for-the-sake-of-noise is so much like that of the 'contingent' here, and conveys as much intelligence. This DSL rig features a snazzy plonker so it's easy to just 'plonkerize' the noise sources and forget 'em. oc(Bill) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"oldcoot" wrote in message
oups.com... On Mar 12, 8:39 pm, "Painius" wrote: There is no heat death. There will never be energy equilibrium on a Universal level. Replenishment is the key. The Universe goes on. ...and on... ...and on... ...and on... Yeah Paine, if you remember this was discussed here several years ago. It's a primary tenet of the CBB model. When the universe reaches the point of maximum expansion and enters the Contraction phase, that's the beginning of the onset of *reversal of entropy* at the universal level. It's illustrated here (you posted this page recently too) - http://community-2.webtv.net/oldcoot/ContinuousBigBang/ I remember reading about it and discussing it, but not understanding it. I think i'm starting to get it. I'm working on bringing back something you did not appear too favorable for... the idea of the SPED operating on different frequencies (energy levels) within its domain, and what the different energy levels might signify. If it comes together like i think it will, it will help me to better understand what you're saying about entrained flow fields and their effects on fields within fields, and on fields they are themselves within. Maybe it's nothing, but i'm going to try anyway. The perception of "ever-accelerating expansion" grew out of the 1a supernova data (circa 1996) which showed the most distant SN1a appearing 'dimmer than they should be'.. which was interpreted as evidence of accelerating expansion. That's the natural interpretation if space in indeed a 'void'. But if space is *not* a void but a universal, fluidic Plenum, it's gonna have a density gradient that shows up at deep cosmological distances, closer in to the BB (as shown on page 2). Light that began its journey in denser, 'hotter' space and propagated into 'our' less dense, 'cooler' space is naturally gonna lose amplitde and appear dimmer, just as is observed. And the expansion curve is shifted toward DEcelerating expansion and a closed universe (as mentioned many times over the years). This'll provoke a cacaphanous fusilade of noise from the usual contingent. Where you been engaging in tete-a-tetes with them at their own level, why not just stow 'em and forget 'em? The old adage "when you rassle with curs you get their fleas" is certainly applicable here. If you could bring yourself to ignore 'em you'd be rid of the "fleas". I have this tenant, an old lady with a scroungy, tiny mutt i call a 'pit yorkie'. The damn thing will go into fits of shrill yip-yapping till it's hoarse and gagging, as if from a prolapsed larynx. Its compulsive noise-for-the-sake-of-noise is so much like that of the 'contingent' here, and conveys as much intelligence. This DSL rig features a snazzy plonker so it's easy to just 'plonkerize' the noise sources and forget 'em. oc(Bill) I understand. I don't killfile, though, but i do understand the feelings of some who *do* like to plonk, and who find me and others whom they don't plonk responding to the worthless plonked posters. BTW, does that old lady's scroungy, tiny mutt pit yorkie possess webbed feet? and is it named "Phineas"? by any chance? g Sure sounds like the Art Deco suckp0ppet! happy days and... starry starry nights -- A secret of the Universe, So please don't breathe a word of this, The Moon Selene will smile perverse Whene'er she sees true lovers kiss-- Breathe not a single word of this. Indelibly yours, Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/ http://www.painellsworth.net |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The mutt's name is Daisy. I kid you not.
oc |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Painius" wrote: All energies eventually reach equilibrium. But not so according to Bill and Wolter! Spatial energy must be sort of an "ultra-high grade" energy that, by virtue of the 2nd law, seeks out the lower grade energies, the nuclear and EM and matter itself. It "deteriorates" and disperses into the known "high grade" energies, which then continue to disperse. Le Sage? -- "Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly. I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish." Painius |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"oldcoot" wrote: This'll provoke a cacaphanous fusilade of noise from the usual contingent. Where you been engaging in tete-a-tetes with them at their own level, why not just stow 'em and forget 'em? The old adage "when you rassle with curs you get their fleas" is certainly applicable here. If you could bring yourself to ignore 'em you'd be rid of the "fleas". Le Sage spanks you all. -- "Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly. I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish." Painius |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Painius" wrote: I understand. I don't killfile, though, but i do understand the feelings of some who *do* like to plonk, and who find me and others whom they don't plonk responding to the worthless plonked posters. BTW, does that old lady's scroungy, tiny mutt pit yorkie possess webbed feet? and is it named "Phineas"? by any chance? g BWAHHAHA another pitiful lame from the saucerheads. Answered any of the objection syet Le Sage? -- "Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly. I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish." Painius |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"oldcoot" wrote in message
oups.com... The mutt's name is Daisy. I kid you not. oc ROTFLOL ! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message
news ![]() In article , "Painius" wrote: All energies eventually reach equilibrium. But not so according to Bill and Wolter! Spatial energy must be sort of an "ultra-high grade" energy that, by virtue of the 2nd law, seeks out the lower grade energies, the nuclear and EM and matter itself. It "deteriorates" and disperses into the known "high grade" energies, which then continue to disperse. Le Sage? Nope, ultra-high grade energy in the supra- and sub-Planck energy-level domain. Le Sage dealt with ultra-low grade energy (matter). His was a particulate theory of gravity that is no longer considered valid. There are a few similarities, however, which is probably why you bring him up. At risk of incurring and enduring your undying love and having you follow me around again like a horny puppy-dog, you get kudos for noticing the similarity. Should i nominate you for some kind of award or something? happy days and... starry starry nights -- A secret of the Universe, So please don't breathe a word of this, The Moon Selene will smile perverse Whene'er she sees true lovers kiss-- Breathe not a single word of this. Indelibly yours, Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/ http://www.painellsworth.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
In a Spirit of Harmony (was - Age of Universe...) | Bill Sheppard | Misc | 100 | March 24th 07 06:43 PM |
In a Spirit of Harmony (was - Age of Universe...) | Bill Sheppard | Misc | 6 | March 8th 07 12:17 AM |
Infinite Universe versus volatile Universe | G. L. Bradford | Policy | 3 | June 21st 06 12:49 PM |
I know how to fix the Spirit | Carsten A. Arnholm | UK Astronomy | 1 | January 30th 04 08:22 AM |