Terrorforming Earth is a Bad Idea

Terrorforming as brought to you by uncontrolled industrialization, corrupt
politicians and religiously promoted overpopulation. Enjoy the changes.

Extinction of Species

Deforestation

Loss of top soil, erosion

Global air pollution

Ocean dead zones

Collapse of fisheries

Greenhouse Warming

Global Dimming
This is a film that demands action. It reveals that we may have grossly
underestimated the speed at which our climate is changing. At its heart is
a deadly new phenomenon. One that until very recently scientists refused
to believe even existed. But it may already have led to the starvation of
millions. Tonight Horizon examines for the first time the power of what
scientists are calling Global Dimming.
http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle15809.htm

William Elliot wrote:
Terrorforming as brought to you by uncontrolled industrialization, corrupt
politicians and religiously promoted overpopulation. Enjoy the changes.

Extinction of Species

Deforestation

Loss of top soil, erosion

Global air pollution

Ocean dead zones

Collapse of fisheries

Greenhouse Warming

Global Dimming
This is a film that demands action. It reveals that we may have grossly
underestimated the speed at which our climate is changing. At its heart is
a deadly new phenomenon. One that until very recently scientists refused
to believe even existed. But it may already have led to the starvation of
millions. Tonight Horizon examines for the first time the power of what
scientists are calling Global Dimming.
http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle15809.htm


Another radical nut case.

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Snap Whipcrack.............. wrote:
William Elliot wrote:

Terrorforming as brought to you by uncontrolled industrialization, corrupt
politicians and religiously promoted overpopulation. Enjoy the changes.

Extinction of Species

Deforestation

Loss of top soil, erosion

Global air pollution

Ocean dead zones

Collapse of fisheries

Greenhouse Warming

Global Dimming
This is a film that demands action. It reveals that we may have grossly
underestimated the speed at which our climate is changing. At its heart is
a deadly new phenomenon. One that until very recently scientists refused
to believe even existed. But it may already have led to the starvation of
millions. Tonight Horizon examines for the first time the power of what
scientists are calling Global Dimming.
http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle15809.htm

Another radical nut case.

Hurray, you qualify as a nutty holocaust and climate warming denier.
BTW, recent testing of west coast fish show they all have mercury.
Bon Appetite

Wash wash wash your brains
Gently down the drain
Mumble bumble rumble grumble
Who's there now to blame?

William Elliot wrote:

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Snap Whipcrack.............. wrote:
William Elliot wrote:

Terrorforming as brought to you by uncontrolled industrialization, corrupt
politicians and religiously promoted overpopulation. Enjoy the changes.


Another radical nut case.

Hurray, you qualify as a nutty holocaust and climate warming denier.
BTW, recent testing of west coast fish show they all have mercury.

So use them for a thermometer. Caring about the environment is fine but
this End of the World crap is just nuts.

--
"The ultimate test is always your own serenity." Robert M Pirsig, "Zen
and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bill Bonde wrote:
William Elliot wrote:

Terrorforming as brought to you by uncontrolled industrialization,
corrupt politicians and religiously promoted overpopulation.
Enjoy the changes.
Another radical nut case.

Hurray, you qualify as a nutty holocaust and climate warming denier.
BTW, recent testing of west coast fish show they all have mercury.

So use them for a thermometer. Caring about the environment is fine but
this End of the World crap is just nuts.

Thermometers aren't made with mercury any more and
all the squirrels I asked, don't like you're nuts.

William Elliot wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bill Bonde wrote:
William Elliot wrote:
Terrorforming as brought to you by uncontrolled industrialization,
corrupt politicians and religiously promoted overpopulation.
Enjoy the changes.
Another radical nut case.

Hurray, you qualify as a nutty holocaust and climate warming denier.
BTW, recent testing of west coast fish show they all have mercury.

So use them for a thermometer. Caring about the environment is fine but
this End of the World crap is just nuts.

Thermometers aren't made with mercury any more and
all the squirrels I asked, don't like you're nuts.

Bill's brain has seen a little too much mercury and lead.

--
The Tsiolkovsky Group : http://www.lifeform.org

My Planetary BLOB : http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :

http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html

"William Elliot" wrote in message
t.com

Terrorforming as brought to you by uncontrolled industrialization, corrupt
politicians and religiously promoted overpopulation. Enjoy the changes.

Extinction of Species

Deforestation

Loss of top soil, erosion

Global air pollution

Ocean dead zones

Collapse of fisheries

Greenhouse Warming

Global Dimming

You forgot all about the dumbing of America.

Humans are perhaps 25% responsible, which is 25% too much since we're
already getting more than our fair share of mascon/tidal and secondary
energy from our somewhat recently obtained moon. Sorry about that.

This following is a revised Guth swag/rant of our global warming day and
nighttime, as seen only by our moon, whereas it seems Earth has been a
lunar gravity heat-sink ever since the last ice age. Getting partially
rid of that moon could save the GW day, as well as a few of our sorry
butts.

Topic: USA urges scientists to block out sun

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...bfac89258430db

http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sc...ma ilgate.org
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:b3689ba0bdcb4f1c587db1829d9d2915.49644@mygate .mailgate.org

Perhaps far better than relocating Sedna into our L1 (at best that's
a good century away no matters what), as a somewhat better notion
yet, we could just resolve all sorts of pesky problems by way of
moving our global roasting moon out to Earth's L1. Thereby getting
rid of all sorts of spare mascon/tidal energy that's inside and out
affecting our environment in a very GW and geophysical bad sort of
planetology way.

How hard could that possibly be?

After all, it's already coasting efficiently along in a good enough
far off orbit to start with, and there's hardly a village idiot soul
on Earth That's smart enough to give a tinkers damn about it.

We'd just end up having ourselves a somewhat better sol+moon 24 hour
tide, which should be much less disruptive than the ongoing pesky
tidal fiasco we've got to deal with as is.

If subsequently our Earth gets too cold, with hardly any applied energy
we could simply send our moon into the sun, or we could try the good old
reliable alternative of simply polluting the living crapolla out of
mother Earth (we're already expert wizards at doing that), creating butt
loads of nasty soot and the full gauntlet range of deploying toxic and
environmental trashing chemicals everywhere, or if push comes down to
shove, simply relocate the wealthy and most powerful folks to our moon
that's rather efficiently parked at Earth's L1, or perhaps employ WW-III
as our local global energy domination war to end all such silly wars
because, by then we'd be pretty much out of the required energy for
making all of those nifty chemical and nuclear bombs, by which utilizing
our healthy cache of such items should otherwise compensate by way of
warming things back up for at least another decade or so.
-

Relocating our moon to Earth's L1 may seem a touch daunting, but with a
yaysay mindset and a constructive sense of motivation, most anything
becomes possible, especially if it pertains to saving your own butt or
of those butts you most admirer or worship.

The last time I'd checked, our somewhat salty and possibly semi-hollow
moon only weighed 7.35e22 kg.

Therefore, 7.35e13 kg of applied force (that's only 73.5 gigatonnes) for
a considerable amount of time should do the trick. Or, if we played our
billiard cards just right and diverted a few NEOs into our moon at just
the right timing and angle (china seems to be coming right along with
that sort of kinetic impact expertise), that should get the old ball
rolling at least in the right direction, and once and for all terminate
those pesky NEOs at the same time. I'd have to call that one yet
another win-win for old gipper.

Of course the more than affordable alternative of simply implementing
terajoules worth of clean renewable terrestrial energy might stay off
the continual global warming trend that's primarily caused by our
absolutely massive and unfortunately nearby moon, and as otherwise
assisted along by our own arrogant and greedy ways of having rather
badly done things for the past couple of centuries. In which case the
moon can stay put and the LSE-CM/ISS can still become a good part of
that saving Earth analogy, by way of giving us loads of clean tether
dipole extracted energy plus efficient access as to whatever can be
rather easily pillaged and plundered out of the moon itself (we could
even put Halliburton plus the likes of Exxon and ENRON in charge,
because, it shouldn't hadly matter how badly they manage to trash our
moon).
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Brad Guth wrote:
"William Elliot" wrote in message

Terrorforming as brought to you by uncontrolled industrialization,
corrupt politicians and religiously promoted overpopulation. Enjoy
the changes.

Extinction of Species

Deforestation
Loss of top soil, erosion

Global air pollution

Ocean dead zones
Collapse of fisheries

Greenhouse Warming
Global Dimming

You forgot all about the dumbing of America.

Whoops.

The Dummy Down Dunce Dance

Forlorn am I to scorn
the land wherein I'm born
where creativity is shorn
to fit some standard norm.

Humans are perhaps 25% responsible, which is 25% too much since we're
already getting more than our fair share of mascon/tidal and secondary
energy from our somewhat recently obtained moon. Sorry about that.

This following is a revised Guth swag/rant of our global warming day and
nighttime, as seen only by our moon, whereas it seems Earth has been a
lunar gravity heat-sink ever since the last ice age. Getting partially
rid of that moon could save the GW day, as well as a few of our sorry
butts.

Oh? What's his problem? Still looking for a dummy down dunce dance
partner?

"William Elliot" wrote in message
et.com

Oh? What's his problem? Still looking for a dummy down dunce dance
partner?

Now you're being a silly butt lacky of a brown nosed minion boy, arnt
you. Which infomercial spewing face are you using this time around?

Since solar activity has next to nothing to do with our ongoing GW
situation, which actually started as of after the last ice age.
However, blocking out a sufficient portion of the sun would cool Earth
is why this following contribution would make for an interesting
production.

Perhaps instead of China going for establishing the one and only
LSE-CM/ISS, and thereby obtaining all sorts of valuable benefits of
global and of moon/space domination from accomplishing such; how about
instead their simply relocating our moon to Earth's L1?

Wherever the heck that physically dark, a bit salty and perhaps a touch
hollow and otherwise downright nasty moon recently came from, it's still
in the process of doing us great harm. Besides our moon having created
the likes of our Arctic ocean basin and having established our seasonal
tilt, and otherwise because it's so freaking massive and nearby, whereas
there's 2e20 joules of mascon/tidal forces taking place, and all of that
applied energy is obviously going somewhere and reacting with whatever's
fluid enough.

Humans are perhaps at most 25% responsible for global warming, which is
obviously 25% too much, especially since we're already receiving more
than our fair share of mascon/tidal and secondary IR/FIR energy from our
somewhat recently obtained moon. Terribly sorry about that.

This following is yet another revised Guth swag/rant, of our global
warming day and nighttime as seen only by our moon, whereas it seems
Earth has been a lunar gravity heat-sink ever since its arrival some
time shortly after the last ice age. However, getting partially rid of
that moon could save the GW day, as well as a few of our sorry butts.

Topic: USA urges scientists to block out sun

"http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/7d2296fc879dbfee/a7bfac89258430db?hl=en#a7bfac89258430db"

"http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sci/sci.space.policy/4cf0d021d2a5422c6eaa33237ffd0554.49644%40mygate.ma ilgate.org"
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:b3689ba0bdcb4f1c587db1829d9d2915.49644@mygate .mailgate.org

Perhaps a far better notion than relocating Sedna into our L1 (at best
that's a good century away no matters what), as a somewhat better notion
yet, we could just resolve all sorts of pesky problems by way of moving
our global roasting moon out to Earth's L1. Thereby getting rid of all
sorts of spare mascon/tidal energy that's inside and out affecting our
environment in a very GW and geophysical bad sort of planetology way.

How hard could that possibly be?

After all, it's already coasting efficiently along in a good enough far
off orbit to start with, and there's hardly a village idiot soul on
Earth That's half smart enough to give a tinkers damn about it.

Once this moon to Earth L1 is accomplished, we'd just end up having
ourselves a somewhat better sol+moon 24 hour tide, which by rights
should be much less disruptive than the ongoing pesky tidal fiasco we've
got to deal with as is.

If subsequently our Earth gets a little too cold, with hardly any
applied energy we could simply send our moon into the sun, or we could
always try the good old reliable alternative of simply polluting the
living crapolla out of mother Earth (we're already expert wizards at
doing that), creating butt loads of nasty soot and the full gauntlet
range of deploying toxic and environmental trashing chemicals
everywhere, or if push comes down to shove, simply relocate the wealthy
and most powerful folks to our moon that's rather efficiently parked at
Earth's L1, or perhaps employ WW-III as our local global energy
domination war to end all such silly wars because, by then we'd be
pretty much out of the required energy for making all of those nifty
chemical and nuclear bombs, by which utilizing our healthy cache of such
items should otherwise compensate by way of warming things back up for
at least another decade or so.
-

Relocating our moon to Earth's L1 may seem a touch daunting, but with a
positive yaysay mindset and a constructive sense of motivation, it seems
most anything becomes possible, especially if it pertains to saving your
own butt or of those butts you most admirer or worship.

The last time I'd checked, our somewhat salty and possibly semi-hollow
moon only weighed 7.35e22 kg.

Therefore, 7.35e13 kg of applied force (that's only 73.5 gigatonnes) for
a considerable amount of time should do the trick. Or, if we played our
billiard cards just right and diverted a few NEOs into our moon at just
the right timing and angle (china seems to be coming right along with
that sort of kinetic impact expertise), that should get the old ball
rolling at least in the right direction, and once and for all terminate
those pesky NEOs at the same time. I'd have to call that one yet
another win-win for old gipper.

Of course, the more than affordable alternative of simply implementing
terajoules worth of clean renewable terrestrial energy (such as the 37.5
kj/m2 that I've proposed) should go a long ways towards staying off the
continual global warming trend that's primarily caused by our absolutely
massive and unfortunately nearby moon, and as otherwise having been
assisted along by our own history of arrogant and greedy ways of having
rather badly done things for the past couple of centuries. In which
case the moon can stay put and the LSE-CM/ISS can still become a good
part of that saving Earth analogy, by way of giving us loads of clean
tether dipole extracted energy plus efficient access as to whatever can
be rather easily pillaged and plundered out of the moon itself (we could
even put Halliburton plus the likes of Exxon and ENRON in charge,
because, it shouldn't hadly matter how badly they manage to trash our
moon).
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG