A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why not send James Bond to LEO using Pagasus airlaunch?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 5th 04, 08:08 AM
Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the f
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why not send James Bond to LEO using Pagasus airlaunch?

http://www.tbs-satellite.com/tse/onl...c_pegasus.html

OSC plans to equip Pegasus XL with two turbojets. Once released at 12000
m altitude the Pegasus Turbo will be accelerated by its turbojets to
reach 30000 m altitude at over Mach 4. OSC claims the 30.8 t Pegasus
Turbo will be 125% more powerful than Pegasus XL and could orbit 1000 kg
in LEO.
  #2  
Old February 5th 04, 07:02 PM
Andrew Gray
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why not send James Bond to LEO using Pagasus airlaunch?

In article , Bill Bonde wrote:

http://www.tbs-satellite.com/tse/onl...c_pegasus.html

OSC plans to equip Pegasus XL with two turbojets. Once released at 12000
m altitude the Pegasus Turbo will be accelerated by its turbojets to
reach 30000 m altitude at over Mach 4. OSC claims the 30.8 t Pegasus
Turbo will be 125% more powerful than Pegasus XL and could orbit 1000 kg
in LEO.


I have seen someone on ss.* discuss a crewed Pegasus; I think they
concluded it was a few inches too tight for comfort. GWH, was it? Hmm.

--
-Andrew Gray

  #3  
Old February 5th 04, 09:15 PM
John Schilling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why not send James Bond to LEO using Pagasus airlaunch?

Andrew Gray writes:

In article , Bill Bonde wrote:


http://www.tbs-satellite.com/tse/onl...c_pegasus.html


OSC plans to equip Pegasus XL with two turbojets. Once released at 12000
m altitude the Pegasus Turbo will be accelerated by its turbojets to
reach 30000 m altitude at over Mach 4. OSC claims the 30.8 t Pegasus
Turbo will be 125% more powerful than Pegasus XL and could orbit 1000 kg
in LEO.


I have seen someone on ss.* discuss a crewed Pegasus; I think they
concluded it was a few inches too tight for comfort. GWH, was it? Hmm.


Yes, but George has different standards of "tight" and "comfort" than
do us ordinary Earth humans. He did indicate that you could orbit a
one-man capsule with an XL, for the average definition of "man".


--
*John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *
*White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *
* for success" *
*661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *


  #4  
Old February 6th 04, 06:27 AM
Gunter Krebs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why not send James Bond to LEO using Pagasus airlaunch?

"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
http://www.tbs-satellite.com/tse/onl...c_pegasus.html

OSC plans to equip Pegasus XL with two turbojets.


There were plans to do that 10 years (or so) ago, but currently OSC has no
plans to upgrade the Pegasus to a jet-powered booster

Gunter Krebs
http://space.skyrocket.de


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
James Bond Anonymous Space Shuttle 7 October 29th 03 12:57 AM
James Bond Anonymous Space Shuttle 0 October 25th 03 11:43 PM
subsonic vs supersonic airlaunch Pete Lynn Policy 85 October 20th 03 04:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.