![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
How comes i find so little about the orion optics UK omc 250 , no reviews etc.at all! If somebody can help me out and tell me something about the quality of this scope please be my guest! Is this scope also usefull on deepsky objects and planets, i would only use it for visuel observe? Thanks a lot for answer Olli |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "olli" wrote in message oups.com... Hello, How comes i find so little about the orion optics UK omc 250 , no reviews etc.at all! If somebody can help me out and tell me something about the quality of this scope please be my guest! Is this scope also usefull on deepsky objects and planets, i would only use it for visuel observe? Thanks a lot for answer Olli Think 'small company'. These scopes have only been around for about a year, and this is a small UK company, so the number sold is countable without needing large numbers of digits. You can select the optical 'quality' yourself (paying extra for 1/6 p/v optics). Mechanically, they are nice, and the optics really _are_ 'what they say on the tin'. Barry makes sure his optics are well inside the quoted figures. The current £:$ ratio, makes these less appealing in the US, than other makes, cutting the market further. There have been a couple of minor private reviews, which have been excellent (look in the archives for the orion Yahoo group). The smaller OMC200, is a traditional Maksutov, with full aperture correctors, but seperate secondary, and is better thought of as 'planetary' scope, with very slow focal ratio, and a tiny fully illuminated field. The 250, and larger instead use a sub aperture corrector assembly as part of the secondary assembly. Much slower focal ratio, and larger illuminated field. The design, is 'targetted' towards imaging, rather than visual use, but this doesn't stop them from being superb visual scopes. What mount would you be considering/using?. Though the Sphinx carries it, if I was putting together a really 'nice' scope system based on this, I'd consider getting something like a Losmandy GM-8, as the 'minimum' good mount, or a heavier unit than this if portability was less of a worry. I have the OMC200 (mine was about the first with the 1/6 p/v optics, and the Hilux coatings, with better than 97% Strehl), and a friend has recently got the 250, intending to use it with an ST-10/AO7 for imaging, but so far, timing, and weather, have stopped me from having more than a short look through it. However first impression, was 'great'... Best Wishes |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|