Licenses for 10.2?

Craig Oldfield verbally sodomised in
:

In article ,
says...

I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy is
not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or download a
copy. The process is to have one master copy from which all install
dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are identical with
identical versions and builds of all software. QA has to stamp all dvds

It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something
that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on?


Because then you'd have nothing to whine about.

--
Phil Kyle™

T
h i
i s
s l
f i l
S o n o
i u e n
g r s g

Phil Kyle wrote:
Craig Oldfield verbally sodomised in
:

In article ,
says...

I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy is
not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or download a
copy. The process is to have one master copy from which all install
dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are identical with
identical versions and builds of all software. QA has to stamp all dvds

It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something
that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on?


Because then you'd have nothing to whine about.


Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse"

Thx.
--
ah

ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
Craig Oldfield verbally sodomised in
:

In article ,
says...

I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy
is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or
download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which
all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are
identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA has
to stamp all dvds

It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something
that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on?


Because then you'd have nothing to whine about.


Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse"

Thx.

Why would you want to sue them anyway?

--
Phil Kyle™

T
h i
i s
s l
f i l
S o n o
i u e n
g r s g

Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
Craig Oldfield verbally sodomised in
:

In article ,
says...

I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a copy
is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or
download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which
all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are
identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA has
to stamp all dvds

It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something
that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining on?


Because then you'd have nothing to whine about.


Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse"

Thx.

Why would you want to sue them anyway?

Novell has very deep pockets...
--
ah

ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
Craig Oldfield verbally sodomised in
:

In article ,
says...

I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a
copy is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or
download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which
all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are
identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA
has to stamp all dvds

It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something
that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining
on?


Because then you'd have nothing to whine about.


Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse"

Thx.

Why would you want to sue them anyway?

Novell has very deep pockets...

Are you implying Novell play pocket billiards?


--
Phil Kyle™

T
h i
i s
s l
f i l
S o n o
i u e n
g r s g

Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
Craig Oldfield verbally sodomised in
:

In article ,
says...

I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a
copy is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy or
download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from which
all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all installs are
identical with identical versions and builds of all software. QA
has to stamp all dvds
It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find something
that fits your license requirements and buy it rather than whining
on?

Because then you'd have nothing to whine about.

Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse"

Thx.
Why would you want to sue them anyway?
Novell has very deep pockets...

Are you implying Novell play pocket billiards?

Let me say this: they are exemplars in the digital.

ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
Craig Oldfield verbally sodomised in
:

In article ,
says...

I think the point has been missed. The cost of having each by a
copy is not an issue. The issue is that each need to buy a copy
or download a copy. The process is to have one master copy from
which all install dvds are made. This is to insure that all
installs are identical with identical versions and builds of all
software. QA has to stamp all dvds
It seems you don't want an answer, why don't you just find
something that fits your license requirements and buy it rather
than whining on?

Because then you'd have nothing to whine about.

Pardon, but the froup is called "alt.os.linux.suse"

Thx.
Why would you want to sue them anyway?
Novell has very deep pockets...

Are you implying Novell play pocket billiards?

Let me say this: they are exemplars in the digital.


They haven't even got to decimal yet, LAM0RZ D00D!

--
Phil Kyle™

T
h i
i s
s l
f i l
S o n o
i u e n
g r s g