![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In August of 2004, I posted a message to this group about a calculation to
find the ground coverage radius to see a meteor at 60K feet above the surface of the earth. Someone, from the British Isles I think, responded with the formulas and maybe a Java script. I'm trying to find those formulas again. I thought I had bookmarked his site. Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet -- "There is more to life than increasing its speed" -- Mahatma Gandhi Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
W. Watson wrote:
In August of 2004, I posted a message to this group about a calculation to find the ground coverage radius to see a meteor at 60K feet above the surface of the earth. Someone, from the British Isles I think, responded with the formulas and maybe a Java script. I'm trying to find those formulas again. I thought I had bookmarked his site. If you're wondering about how far away on the ground one can see a meteor at 60,000 feet (about 18 km), the formula is d = 121*sqrt(h) where h is the height in kilometers, and d is the distance from which an object at that height is visible, also in kilometers. This formula takes atmospheric refraction into account, using a rule of thumb mentioned by Andrew Young. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Tung wrote:
W. Watson wrote: In August of 2004, I posted a message to this group about a calculation to find the ground coverage radius to see a meteor at 60K feet above the surface of the earth. Someone, from the British Isles I think, responded with the formulas and maybe a Java script. I'm trying to find those formulas again. I thought I had bookmarked his site. If you're wondering about how far away on the ground one can see a meteor at 60,000 feet (about 18 km), the formula is d = 121*sqrt(h) where h is the height in kilometers, and d is the distance from which an object at that height is visible, also in kilometers. This formula takes atmospheric refraction into account, using a rule of thumb mentioned by Andrew Young. Actually, the formula I had in mind was similar to this idea, but I wanted the radius when at 60K feet the meteor was 10 degrees above the horizon from the observer's location. 15 degrees, etc. Time for me to look in MatLab. I may have implemented it there. Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet -- "There is more to life than increasing its speed" -- Mahatma Gandhi Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
W. Watson wrote:
Actually, the formula I had in mind was similar to this idea, but I wanted the radius when at 60K feet the meteor was 10 degrees above the horizon from the observer's location. 15 degrees, etc. Is the answer you get from assuming that the Earth is flat not precise enough? -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Tung wrote:
W. Watson wrote: Actually, the formula I had in mind was similar to this idea, but I wanted the radius when at 60K feet the meteor was 10 degrees above the horizon from the observer's location. 15 degrees, etc. Is the answer you get from assuming that the Earth is flat not precise enough? I believe the formula I used took into account a circular earth. The radius I last calculated using it was something like 300 miles. I'm not sure a flat earth wouldn't have given close to the same answer. Why I'm really interested in finding the site is that the fellow had many more useful calculations. Well, this isn't really a pressing matter any longer. Eventually, I'll likely find the method somewhere on my computer. If I really need to do the calc for this case, I'll work out the details myself. Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet -- "There is more to life than increasing its speed" -- Mahatma Gandhi Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
W. Watson wrote:
I believe the formula I used took into account a circular earth. The radius I last calculated using it was something like 300 miles. I'm not sure a flat earth wouldn't have given close to the same answer. Why I'm really interested in finding the site is that the fellow had many more useful calculations. Well, this isn't really a pressing matter any longer. Eventually, I'll likely find the method somewhere on my computer. If I really need to do the calc for this case, I'll work out the details myself. In case you're still curious, I get d = sqrt(2hR + [(R+h)tan(a)]^2) - (R+h)tan(a) where h is the height of the meteor, R is the radius of the Earth (those two measurements in consistent units), and a is the minimum angular altitude of the meteor. Then d is in the same units as h and R. This formula is an approximation, assuming that d is fairly small compared to R. For a = 10 degrees and h = 60000 ft (= 18.3 km), it yields 97.3 km, as opposed to 101.8 km for a flat Earth. To account for refraction, increase R by 15 percent. This yields 97.9 km, a slight increase. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Tung wrote:
W. Watson wrote: I believe the formula I used took into account a circular earth. The radius I last calculated using it was something like 300 miles. I'm not sure a flat earth wouldn't have given close to the same answer. Why I'm really interested in finding the site is that the fellow had many more useful calculations. Well, this isn't really a pressing matter any longer. Eventually, I'll likely find the method somewhere on my computer. If I really need to do the calc for this case, I'll work out the details myself. In case you're still curious, I get d = sqrt(2hR + [(R+h)tan(a)]^2) - (R+h)tan(a) where h is the height of the meteor, R is the radius of the Earth (those two measurements in consistent units), and a is the minimum angular altitude of the meteor. Then d is in the same units as h and R. This formula is an approximation, assuming that d is fairly small compared to R. For a = 10 degrees and h = 60000 ft (= 18.3 km), it yields 97.3 km, as opposed to 101.8 km for a flat Earth. To account for refraction, increase R by 15 percent. This yields 97.9 km, a slight increase. Good. Thanks very much. Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet -- "There is more to life than increasing its speed" -- Mahatma Gandhi Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My 2004 Post on Meteor Coverage Area | Odysseus | Astronomy Misc | 4 | December 7th 06 01:21 PM |
Post Sputnik, Post Apollo, Post Shuttle ... | Thomas Lee Elifritz | Policy | 9 | June 9th 06 05:58 AM |
Perseid Meteor Shower 2004 | Marty | Misc | 3 | June 4th 04 03:45 PM |
Radio Meteor Obs. Bull. March 2004 | Chris Steyaert | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | April 15th 04 12:43 PM |
Wash Post shuttle story six weeks behind NBC coverage | James Oberg | Space Shuttle | 6 | August 29th 03 10:27 PM |