![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beyond the universe is like being between the furthest two galaxies in
our universe. You can't see them because of the great distance . They can feel each other because of their mutual gravitational attraction. We must use this like we were between our parallel universe(Treb's) Space between universes is expanding at an accelerating rate,and this rate of expansion is equal to the number of universes being created. It is the infinite spacetime of the cosmos. It is the infinite number of universes created over an infinite spacetime. Nature needs these universes to create a gravitational cosmos grid. This grid adds to each universe's gravity force,by a factor of 90% Sum it up universe's missing gravity is the gravity of the cosmos. Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Beyond the universe is like being between the furthest two galaxies in our universe. You can't see them because of the great distance . They can feel each other because of their mutual gravitational attraction. We must use this like we were between our parallel universe(Treb's) Space between universes is expanding at an accelerating rate,and this rate of expansion is equal to the number of universes being created. It is the infinite spacetime of the cosmos. It is the infinite number of universes created over an infinite spacetime. Nature needs these universes to create a gravitational cosmos grid. This grid adds to each universe's gravity force,by a factor of 90% Sum it up universe's missing gravity is the gravity of the cosmos. Bert The title of the original posting, for lack of better words, is wrong for the totally nonsensical missive fading away rather rapidly. So, I have renamed this thread, to help with attributions. That should have OP running to his dictionary. ;-) Thankfully, I won't see his response. The truth that OP write like a 5 year old, or that he's functionally illiterate? sound of him running for dictionary again |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Miller wrote:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Beyond the universe is like being between the furthest two galaxies in our universe. You can't see them because of the great distance . They can feel each other because of their mutual gravitational attraction. We must use this like we were between our parallel universe(Treb's) Space between universes is expanding at an accelerating rate,and this rate of expansion is equal to the number of universes being created. It is the infinite spacetime of the cosmos. It is the infinite number of universes created over an infinite spacetime. Nature needs these universes to create a gravitational cosmos grid. This grid adds to each universe's gravity force,by a factor of 90% Sum it up universe's missing gravity is the gravity of the cosmos. Bert He, he, he, he, he.... Not a single testable idea in the whole lot - nonscientific drivel. Let's start with "beyond the universe". Current testable theories put the number of universes at one, and that one is infinite in extent while being finite in age. If the former of these two is valid, as the latter seems to be, it would seem that and infinite curvature universe would not have competition. And, more importantly, if multiple universe do exist, they would be causally disconnected, meaning that they could not exert gravitational or any other forces upon each other by which we would know of their existence. If they can influence each other, then they are part of the same universe, and the multiple universe idea fails. "former of these two is valid"? Aww, now you've made me blush ... "The terms the former and the latter are used instead of a pair of names. If three or more persons or objects are referred to, the words first or last should be used." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() kelly Cherniske wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Beyond the universe is like being between the furthest two galaxies in our universe. You can't see them because of the great distance . They can feel each other because of their mutual gravitational attraction. We must use this like we were between our parallel universe(Treb's) Space between universes is expanding at an accelerating rate,and this rate of expansion is equal to the number of universes being created. It is the infinite spacetime of the cosmos. It is the infinite number of universes created over an infinite spacetime. Nature needs these universes to create a gravitational cosmos grid. This grid adds to each universe's gravity force,by a factor of 90% Sum it up universe's missing gravity is the gravity of the cosmos. Bert The title of the original posting, for lack of better words, is wrong for the totally nonsensical missive fading away rather rapidly. So, I have renamed this thread, to help with attributions. That should have OP running to his dictionary. ;-) Thankfully, I won't see his response. The truth that OP write like a 5 year old, or that he's functionally illiterate? sound of him running for dictionary again Hey, this is a science nerd group, not an English grammar nerd group! Double-A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Double-A" wrote in message ps.com... kelly Cherniske wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Beyond the universe is like being between the furthest two galaxies in our universe. You can't see them because of the great distance . They can feel each other because of their mutual gravitational attraction. We must use this like we were between our parallel universe(Treb's) Space between universes is expanding at an accelerating rate,and this rate of expansion is equal to the number of universes being created. It is the infinite spacetime of the cosmos. It is the infinite number of universes created over an infinite spacetime. Nature needs these universes to create a gravitational cosmos grid. This grid adds to each universe's gravity force,by a factor of 90% Sum it up universe's missing gravity is the gravity of the cosmos. Bert The title of the original posting, for lack of better words, is wrong for the totally nonsensical missive fading away rather rapidly. So, I have renamed this thread, to help with attributions. That should have OP running to his dictionary. ;-) Thankfully, I won't see his response. The truth that OP write like a 5 year old, or that he's functionally illiterate? sound of him running for dictionary again Hey, this is a science nerd group, not an English grammar nerd group! Double-A YEAH ! OJ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "kelly Cherniske" wrote in message oups.com... The title of the original posting, for lack of better words, is wrong for the totally nonsensical missive fading away rather rapidly. So, I have renamed this thread, to help with attributions. That should have OP running to his dictionary. ;-) Thankfully, I won't see his response. The truth that OP write like a 5 year old, or that he's functionally illiterate? sound of him running for dictionary again it's always easier to blame the weather, I guess |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "kelly Cherniske" wrote in message oups.com... "former of these two is valid"? the subject line says it all. It always takes me about 3 days to remember thataddress, Aww, now you've made me blush ... "The terms the former and the latter are used instead of a pair of names. If three or more persons or objects are referred to, the words first or last should be used." did you watch the olympics opening -- what was up with the mighy morphin power ranger beating the head of thundercleese. I think it was an iron cow but i am not sure And Tomba da bomba has gotten quite old. I wonder if he still skis. and i have never quite gotten why people think sofia loren is so beautiful. yeah maybe when she was a kid, no, she was just stacked then, but she never had a great face so i wonder why people get used to saying she is so beautiful when she is not. that's just my opnion of course, everyone seems to disagree with me |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry to break the news, your therory don't hold water
why? It's been said the universe is infinite, therfore there can not exits more than one if it was true, the univeres would have borders ! you say "space between universes" space is not a border therefor it's still the same universe and not as you claim infinite universes "G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse ... Beyond the universe is like being between the furthest two galaxies in our universe. You can't see them because of the great distance . They can feel each other because of their mutual gravitational attraction. We must use this like we were between our parallel universe(Treb's) Space between universes is expanding at an accelerating rate,and this rate of expansion is equal to the number of universes being created. It is the infinite spacetime of the cosmos. It is the infinite number of universes created over an infinite spacetime. Nature needs these universes to create a gravitational cosmos grid. This grid adds to each universe's gravity force,by a factor of 90% Sum it up universe's missing gravity is the gravity of the cosmos. Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere. Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 9702 spam-mails Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails. Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Starman wrote: Sorry to break the news, your therory don't hold water why? It's been said the universe is infinite, therfore there can not exits more than one If there was a Big Bang, the universe cannot be infinite. Think about it. if it was true, the univeres would have borders ! you say "space between universes" space is not a border therefor it's still the same universe and not as you claim infinite universes Theoretically, a paper sheet could define a two-dimensional universe. It could be finite or infinite, yet another parallel paper sheet could define another two-dimensional universe. So if there exists a fourth spatial dimension, then theoretically another three-dimensional universe could exist parallel to ours, separated by a distance in the fourth dimension. Double-A "G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse ... Beyond the universe is like being between the furthest two galaxies in our universe. You can't see them because of the great distance . They can feel each other because of their mutual gravitational attraction. We must use this like we were between our parallel universe(Treb's) Space between universes is expanding at an accelerating rate,and this rate of expansion is equal to the number of universes being created. It is the infinite spacetime of the cosmos. It is the infinite number of universes created over an infinite spacetime. Nature needs these universes to create a gravitational cosmos grid. This grid adds to each universe's gravity force,by a factor of 90% Sum it up universe's missing gravity is the gravity of the cosmos. Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere. Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 9702 spam-mails Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails. Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Big Bang created the Universe therefor it's you that must think ! a paper sheet is not like the universe, you can't flip the universe and find a backside so no matter how many dimensions there is, it's still the same universe (or paper sheet) if something like the universe is infinite it can't coexist with other universe, if it does that it's no longer infinite you try to think about that ! "Double-A" skrev i en meddelelse oups.com... Starman wrote: Sorry to break the news, your therory don't hold water why? It's been said the universe is infinite, therfore there can not exits more than one If there was a Big Bang, the universe cannot be infinite. Think about it. if it was true, the univeres would have borders ! you say "space between universes" space is not a border therefor it's still the same universe and not as you claim infinite universes Theoretically, a paper sheet could define a two-dimensional universe. It could be finite or infinite, yet another parallel paper sheet could define another two-dimensional universe. So if there exists a fourth spatial dimension, then theoretically another three-dimensional universe could exist parallel to ours, separated by a distance in the fourth dimension. Double-A "G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse ... Beyond the universe is like being between the furthest two galaxies in our universe. You can't see them because of the great distance . They can feel each other because of their mutual gravitational attraction. We must use this like we were between our parallel universe(Treb's) Space between universes is expanding at an accelerating rate,and this rate of expansion is equal to the number of universes being created. It is the infinite spacetime of the cosmos. It is the infinite number of universes created over an infinite spacetime. Nature needs these universes to create a gravitational cosmos grid. This grid adds to each universe's gravity force,by a factor of 90% Sum it up universe's missing gravity is the gravity of the cosmos. Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere. Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 9702 spam-mails Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails. Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere. Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 9702 spam-mails Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails. Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Teleportation knowledge analizer of the internet matirx! IT's a | Roger wilco | History | 4 | July 8th 05 06:11 PM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Policy | 0 | February 4th 05 11:06 PM |
CRACK THIS CODE!!! WHY DID IT HAPPEN READ THIS DISTRUCTION!!!! | zetasum | History | 0 | February 3rd 05 12:28 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | May 21st 04 11:44 PM |