![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So you wonder what our Strategic Forces consisted of in 1971? How many
Minutemen, how many Titan IIs, how many B-52s? Well.... you might have it in a book somewhere, as at the time these were publicly known figures, freely disseminated. But not any more...this data has now been reclassified. This isn't closing the gate after the horse has escaped, this is closing the gate after the horse's great-grandfoals have long been turned into glue: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...082000625.html This is also kind of fun: http://www.dickdestiny.com/blog/2006/08/dept.html Pat |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:31 -0500, Pat Flannery wrote:
... this is closing the gate after the horse's great-grandfoals have long been turned into glue: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...082000625.html You can't say that "security theater has reached new hights"... because it has never left the gutter clearly marked "Bureaucratic Power Grab" Hey, Rusty... would they try to redact your missile sites as well? This is also kind of fun: http://www.dickdestiny.com/blog/2006/08/dept.html There goes the budget for a Phalanx CIWS mounted in every jetliner's cargo bay... .... .... Hmmm? No, no- I know it wouldn't work either, but it'd be cool as hell to watch ![]() Pat -- Chuck Stewart "Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Stewart wrote:
... Hmmm? No, no- I know it wouldn't work either, but it'd be cool as hell to watch ![]() Check out today's http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ Best of these shots I've seen. I don't know how well it would decoy incoming hardware, but all the humans would be going "ooooo... pretty" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Monte Davis" wrote in message ... Chuck Stewart wrote: ... Hmmm? No, no- I know it wouldn't work either, but it'd be cool as hell to watch ![]() Check out today's http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ Best of these shots I've seen. I don't know how well it would decoy incoming hardware, but all the humans would be going "ooooo... pretty" It's the Flying Spaghetti Monster! Obey your noodly master! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Hedrick wrote: Check out today's http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ Best of these shots I've seen. I don't know how well it would decoy incoming hardware, but all the humans would be going "ooooo... pretty" It's the Flying Spaghetti Monster! Obey your noodly master! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster It's a SIGN! His Child shall be soon among us! Pat |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pat Flannery wrote: So you wonder what our Strategic Forces consisted of in 1971? How many Minutemen, how many Titan IIs, how many B-52s? Well.... you might have it in a book somewhere, as at the time these were publicly known figures, freely disseminated. But not any more...this data has now been reclassified. This isn't closing the gate after the horse has escaped, this is closing the gate after the horse's great-grandfoals have long been turned into glue: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...082000625.html This is also kind of fun: http://www.dickdestiny.com/blog/2006/08/dept.html Pat I saw that article too. Kind of silly ot redact that data I thought. Unless there's an obsolete nuke weapon accountability problem that Uncle Sam doesn't want to admit . Do they have an accurate track of where all of their N-weapons ( current or otherwise) are? Gene DiGennaro Baltimore, Md. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pat Flannery wrote: So you wonder what our Strategic Forces consisted of in 1971? How many Minutemen, how many Titan IIs, how many B-52s? Well.... you might have it in a book somewhere, as at the time these were publicly known figures, freely disseminated. But not any more...this data has now been reclassified. This isn't closing the gate after the horse has escaped, this is closing the gate after the horse's great-grandfoals have long been turned into glue: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...082000625.html This is also kind of fun: http://www.dickdestiny.com/blog/2006/08/dept.html Pat This all seems rather silly. I've got books which have the numbers year by year from 1945 onwards. Unless that information was deliberately fudged back then, I don't see the point. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Scott Hedrick wrote: Check out today's http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ Best of these shots I've seen. I don't know how well it would decoy incoming hardware, but all the humans would be going "ooooo... pretty" It's the Flying Spaghetti Monster! Obey your noodly master! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster It's a SIGN! His Child shall be soon among us! And a ravioli shall be His bed |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pat Flannery wrote: So you wonder what our Strategic Forces consisted of in 1971? How many Minutemen, how many Titan IIs, how many B-52s? Well.... you might have it in a book somewhere, as at the time these were publicly known figures, freely disseminated. But not any more...this data has now been reclassified. This isn't closing the gate after the horse has escaped, this is closing the gate after the horse's great-grandfoals have long been turned into glue: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...082000625.html This is also kind of fun: http://www.dickdestiny.com/blog/2006/08/dept.html Pat This is so stupid. I hope they don't come for my copy of David Stumpf's excellent "Titan II". It says, right there on page 52 with no "CLASSIFIED" stamps on the page, that 108 operational Titan II missiles were built during the program. In Chapter 5, Stumpf describes in detail how these missiles were used to support a ready-to-fire system that initially included 54 operational silos at three bases, with each missile carrying a massive multi-megaton (how many megatons is actually still classified, I think) W-53 warhead. 52 silos were still active in 1981 when the decision was made to retire Titan II. Says in Chapter 6 that by 1971-ish there would have been 52 Titans and 1,000 Minuteman ICBMs, with more than 2,000 total warheads to handle something similar to the the 1,060 USSR aim points that were spelled out in 1960. Will they come for me now? Well, I suppose I shouldn't start worrying unless Mr. Stumpf and his publisher "disappear". - Ed Kyle |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:11:59 -0700, Ed Kyle wrote:
... 108 operational Titan II missiles were built during the program. In Chapter 5, Stumpf describes in detail how these missiles were used to support a ready-to-fire system that initially included 54 operational silos at three bases, with each missile carrying a massive multi-megaton (how many megatons is actually still classified, I think) W-53 warhead. 9 megatonns. .... ![]() There are several sources on the net, but Carey Sublette's Nuclear Weapons Archive is a very good start: http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/.../Allbombs.html - Ed Kyle -- Chuck Stewart "Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coming soon to a newgroup near you. | don findlay | Astronomy Misc | 135 | June 28th 06 02:13 AM |
"Deep Impact" predictions | Tom Van Flandern | Astronomy Misc | 39 | August 20th 05 11:13 AM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 04 02:35 AM |
Our Moon as BattleStar | Rick Sobie | Astronomy Misc | 93 | February 8th 04 09:31 PM |
Something more interesting for you to read! | Greg Dortmond | UK Astronomy | 12 | December 22nd 03 04:51 AM |