![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Glover wrote:
We don't vote directly on NASA programs and management. And the people who *do* influence that (Congeess and the President), depending on the political philosophy of the next Administration, will either continue the current programs (perhaps with some shuffling or budget downsizing) or end the programs completely. My very real suggestion to you and anybody else reading this is to vote in a democratic congress this fall, and then demand that they remove George W. Bush and Dick Cheney from office forthwith, thus obviating the ****burger, Conrad Lautenberg and Michael Griffin problems, which believe me, are very real and serious problems for science in this once great nation of ours. [snip gothiness] http://cosmic.lifeform.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Director wrote:
Frank Glover wrote: We don't vote directly on NASA programs and management. And the people who *do* influence that (Congeess and the President), depending on the political philosophy of the next Administration, will either continue the current programs (perhaps with some shuffling or budget downsizing) or end the programs completely. My very real suggestion to you and anybody else reading this is to vote in a democratic congress this fall, and then demand that they remove George W. Bush and Dick Cheney from office forthwith, thus obviating the ****burger, Conrad Lautenberg and Michael Griffin problems, which believe me, are very real and serious problems for science in this once great nation of ours. [snip gothiness] http://cosmic.lifeform.org Just so you know, I happen to be a registed Democrat, but I've probably never voted a straight party line in my life. (I hear lots of 'trash Bush.' Okay, fine. Now, what *else* are you for, please. George McGovern suffered from the same thing. Get us out of Vietnam? Okay. Now what will you do with the *other* three years and eleven months, sir? I don't know about you, but I look at *many* issues before pulling the lever.) And somehow, you've forgotten to tell me how the above will enhance space science *or* development. (again, just so you know, I'm posting from the sci.space.policy NG, and that's how I'm approaching this thread) The last Democrat president to be clearly for it, was Lyndon Johnson. No presidential candidate lost or gained many votes for their position on such things. But as long as the government doesn't get in the *way,* I can live with it. Throwing some useful bones out there like the recent COTS money is good too, but not make-or-break. AsI've said elsewhere, ISS's biggest value may be in providing a modest but real re-supply market for the startups to address, and continue from there. -- Frank You know what to remove to reply... Check out my web page: http://www.geocities.com/stardolphin1/link2.htm "Man who say it cannot be done, should not interrupt man doing it." - Chinese Proverb |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shuttle Safety [was: Re... | John Schilling | Policy | 41 | August 4th 06 10:56 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | January 1st 06 10:57 PM |
NASA PDF - Apollo Experience Reports - 114 reports | Rusty | History | 1 | July 27th 05 03:52 AM |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Policy | 145 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |