Einstein did his best work when he was a complete outsider.

Hi Art_Deco, a.k.a. T_Puddleduck, Looking at your headers...

T_Puddleduck: Thoth_1_7_2_Carbon_OS_X
Art_Deco: Thoth_1_7_2_Carbon_OS_X

Roy_L_Fuchs is a grammer lammer, just like you... big deal.
Hmm... both of your personalites like _Huge_ sigs with lots of flames:

Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
....
"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

Double-A appears to be right,
Einstein did his best work when he was a complete outsider.
What's your problem with that ?

In article , Jeff’ĶRelf
wrote:

Hi Art_Deco, a.k.a. T_Puddleduck, Looking at your headers...

T_Puddleduck: Thoth_1_7_2_Carbon_OS_X
Art_Deco: Thoth_1_7_2_Carbon_OS_X

Roy_L_Fuchs is a grammer lammer, just like you... big deal.
Hmm... both of your personalites like _Huge_ sigs with lots of flames:

Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
....
"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

Double-A appears to be right,
Einstein did his best work when he was a complete outsider.
What's your problem with that ?



Einstein had a comprehensive education in Physics.

You do not


Einstein worked by examining inconsistencies in existing physics.

You copy and paste from Wikipedia.


Einstein did his own work.

You don't.


You're a maroon.

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

Hi T_Puddleduck, I realise your Physics degree is exciting to you and all;
but what good does that do _Me_ ? does it help you understand my posts ?
Why not keep your degree a big secret
and just blow us away with your knowledge instead ?
I don't expect you to be studying the same thing I am,
nor do I expect you to understand what I write without asking questions.

Jeff...Relf wrote:
Hi Art_Deco, a.k.a. T_Puddleduck, Looking at your headers...

T_Puddleduck: Thoth_1_7_2_Carbon_OS_X
Art_Deco: Thoth_1_7_2_Carbon_OS_X

Roy_L_Fuchs is a grammer lammer, just like you... big deal.
Hmm... both of your personalites like _Huge_ sigs with lots of flames:

Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
....
"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

Double-A appears to be right,
Einstein did his best work when he was a complete outsider.
What's your problem with that ?
Absolutely everything is a big-ass insurmountable problem for the likes
of the all-knowing Art Deco, William Mook and even David Knisely.

I would also have to totally agree that "Einstein did his best work
when he was a complete outsider".

William.Mook; We must first say what we do not know, before
we can even hope to learn more. Guthball and tomass don't do
that. They assert all sorts of things without evidence because
it feels good."
Because I'm not the least bit all-knowing, I've asked way more than my
fair share of questions from the very get go, such as why are the laws
of physics different for that of our physically dark and nasty moon or
that of another planet like Venus, and as to why we haven't established
the LL-1 science platform or even having the likes of ACE taking a
look-see at the difference which exist between that of our Van Allen
belts and the physically dark and nasty moon of ours, and I've asked
why haven't we obtained hard-science as derived from live and
interactive science probes working from the surface of our moon. I've
even asked more than a hundred times as to why we haven't a stitch of
hard-science pertaining to raw ice in space.

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson

And so fort with at least another thousand such examples of sayings,
including those of Einstine's and of most every other supposedly
intelligent mind that has ever been on Earth.

Observationology is a very real science, and it is worthy if not an
essential phase in most every realm of learning and discovery. Yet
folks like William Mook and David Knisely that continually impose their
all-knowing wizardly mindset of supposed expertise in every conceivable
realm of science are simply chuck full of their anti-ET and otherwise
incest crapolla to the point of no return, while others are merely
infomercial-science snookered and thus 100% dumbfounded beyond the
point of their no return of having committed so many examples of
horrific wrong doings that it's downright embarrassing as to being
associated with the same species.

Mooks's naysayism of using such obvious mainstream status quo lies upon
lies as based upon those conditional laws of physics and of spiffy
infomercial-science that's been NOVA and otherwise promoted as truthism
is worth something less than used toilet paper. Their not believing in
the bible is one thing, and of their not believing in the koran is
obviously another thing, but to not be believing by way of blocking
and/or of having banished those using the regular laws of physics and
of whatever's the best available hard-science that can be replicated is
worse off than even what their Third Reich represented, which obviously
doesn't bother these folks one damn bit.

The nearly 30% inert portion of the GLOW of their Saturn 5 that
supposedly managed such a horrific tonnage at the unbelievable and
unreplicated performance of 60:1 worth of total rocket/payload into
orbiting our moon within as little as 75 hours is just another good
example of the sorts of conditional physics and infomercial science
that's running us amuck. The unavoidable gamma and hard-X-ray
environment of that moon of ours is simply another touch of the truth
that's getting sequestered and/or banished by way of their continual
exclusions of such evidence, and/or by way of insisting that their
conditional laws of physics and infomercial science is the one and only
truth there is to behold.

For everything that I think that I know for certain, I've asked a
thousand questions so that others can contribute by way of sharing
whatever expertise and/or SWAG they've got, and I've given credit
wherever possible. However, time after time only to get the typical
incest naysayism mindset of Lord Mook's anti-everything in the universe
in return. As such, I do believe there's crapolla on this Earth that's
more honest and thereby more intelligent than Mook or even that of
Knisely that are obviously sleeping together along with the likes of
Art Deco and every other collaborating minion to their Third Reich, and
so much so intellectually fornacating that these folks that have become
so bigoted that they've gone blind in the process, and therefore
seemingly can't wait to put the likes of their own kind if not Christ
back on that stick.
-
Brad Guth

In article , Jeff’ĶRelf
wrote:

Hi T_Puddleduck, I realise your Physics degree is exciting to you and all;
but what good does that do _Me_ ? does it help you understand my posts ?

Considering you have no physics qualifications at all...

Why not keep your degree a big secret
and just blow us away with your knowledge instead ?

I've already educated you on inflation, you're just too stupid to
understand it.

I don't expect you to be studying the same thing I am,
nor do I expect you to understand what I write without asking questions.

Jeff,

A person at high-school level physics can refute your garbage.

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

Hi T_Puddleduck, You imagined:

I've already educated you on inflation,
you're just too stupid to understand it.

You didn't tell my anything about
the model of inflation that I didn't already know.
Your knowledge of it has always been very superficial, limited to sound bites.
Professor Ned Wright's comment that an ever-constant lambda
is in agreement with inflation theory is what made me rethink it;
causing me to write this: www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG

In article , Jeff’ĶRelf
wrote:

Hi T_Puddleduck, You imagined:

I've already educated you on inflation,
you're just too stupid to understand it.

You didn't tell my anything about
the model of inflation that I didn't already know.

Yet it was my postings that caused to rewrite the ******** you write.


Your knowledge of it has always been very superficial, limited to sound bites.

If mine is superficial, yours is nonexistent. Where did you study
cosmology too Jeff, under which professor? What is your physics
qualifications?

1) Nowhere
2) Wikipedia SNICKE
3) NONE

And the maths I posted it? Nice try at rewriting history kook, but how
about I point you too

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...1da888a?hl=en&

http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=htt...group/sci.phys
ics/msg/784f1673f7d98696

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...1b34819?hl=en&

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...77eadbc?hl=en&

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...eb69ff4?hl=en&

Professor Ned Wright's comment that an ever-constant lambda
is in agreement with inflation theory is what made me rethink it;

Oh the delicious irony. It was ME who poined that out, using his
website!

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...77eadbc?hl=en&

causing me to write this: www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG



Still ********. HOW DID THE ANISOTROPIES OCCUR JEFF? Why are they the
scale they are? Explained the horizon problem, or the flatness problem
yet?

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

Hi T_Puddleduck, You asked me:

HOW DID THE ANISOTROPIES OCCUR JEFF ?

Never, not once, did I ever say that our entire visible universe
wasn't once in causal contact... expanded from a sub-Planck era.
My only doubt was about the _Rate_ of expansion... not whether it occured.
You never understood that... you still don't... and probaly never will.
You don't even know that the competing theories of inflation are... I do.

You asked me: Why are they the scale they are ?

I already answered that:

The birth of the CMB contains minute ( .001 percent ) deviations
from 2.7 Kelvin which reveal the " acoustic " harmonics between
the baryon-photon traveling sound wave and the dark matter standing wave,
thus releaving the size and age of the super-Planck universe.

You asked me:

Explained the horizon problem, or the flatness problem yet ?

Both were answered above. Do you have question about it ? I don't.
w = -1 precludes monopoles... do you know why ?

In article , Jeff’ĶRelf
wrote:

Hi T_Puddleduck, You asked me:

HOW DID THE ANISOTROPIES OCCUR JEFF ?

Never, not once, did I ever say that our entire visible universe
wasn't once in causal contact... expanded from a sub-Planck era.

YOU WERE THE ONE WHO CALLED INFLATION POOR SCI-FI!

My only doubt was about the _Rate_ of expansion... not whether it occured.
You never understood that... you still don't... and probaly never will.
You don't even know that the competing theories of inflation are... I do.

You asked me: Why are they the scale they are ?

I already answered that:

The birth of the CMB contains minute ( .001 percent ) deviations
from 2.7 Kelvin which reveal the " acoustic " harmonics between
the baryon-photon traveling sound wave and the dark matter standing wave,
thus releaving the size and age of the super-Planck universe.

You asked me:

Explained the horizon problem, or the flatness problem yet ?

Both were answered above. Do you have question about it ? I don't.
w = -1 precludes monopoles... do you know why ?

Because you're talking ********?




--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

In article , Jeff’ĶRelf
wrote:

You asked me:

Explained the horizon problem, or the flatness problem yet ?

Both were answered above. Do you have question about it ? I don't.
w = -1 precludes monopoles... do you know why ?

For a start - you don't understand the difference between cosmic
expansion and inflation theory. You have no mechanism to explain why
the anisotropies of the CMB are explained by inflation. You witter on
endlessly about w without realising that this isn't the subject matter
in discussion.

You inability to follow the maths in dating the CMB and your insistence
the 0.667 term was a mistake and should have been w is a telling
example that your maths level is barely above kindergarten.

You have no mechanism to explain the monopole problem, and instead rely
upon the rote repeatng of several word salad phrases to expound your
"theories". You see yourself in your mind as another Einstein, when you
ain't even another Bozo the Clown. You think that repeating word salad
will someone make it metamorphisise into true physics.

You have no physics education whatsoever, even going so far to claim
your "studies" were of WikiPedia. You are at the point of being thrown
off there for vandalising the Albert Einstein page with your own brand
of errant nonsense.

When people disagree with you, you insist it is because they don't
understand you, regardless of the fact that you are arguing with people
who have studied physics and cosmology properly. When faced with links
that prove you wrong, you call them irrelevant when it is obvious you
do not understand them.

Google-group seacrching you reveals that:
You're a deadbeat dad who doesn't pay child support, post naked and
once posted his bank account details online convinced someone was going
to pay him billions of dollars. You even posted your own phone number
to GG.

A quick google search of our username reveals your complete idiocy. You
can't even code proper C, and when called out upon that you argue again
with experts. You argue about direct draw with Linux gurus, and you
leech your internet access from students, and your website looks like
it was created in the Stone age.

Is that enough?

Now please shut up with your Noddy cosmology. You're in the running for
two kook awards this month from alt.usenet.kooks - but you will
probably fail to win those.

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED