digest, volume 2453924

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
Michael Hunt wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
alias # today total year 3 year 2
year
1

------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
bruce 24 404 2867 1979
0
deco 15 352 3722 2268
0

Obsession with Bruce and Deco noted.


------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
40 43 1126 11687 9100
10033


It didn't long for the list to grow. Did you ever wonder why you
have
so
many antagonists? Do you have any friends left in
rec.music.classical?

He lives to turn the crank on the Holy Digestor.


Hunting asteroids and playing clarinet doesn't keep him busy enough?

Apparently not. He ignored me for about six months starting this
winter, but then began playing catchup with these massive 200-post
digest screeds. He eventually put every single post I made to
sci.astro during this period into a digest.

Does he still post a digest in sci.astro?

Nope, never. I assume it is because he doesn't want his kookery
exposed in front of his peers.

Does he at least make the occassional on-topic post there?

Note that lots of other people
crosspost to sci.astro, yet of all of these, he only digests me.
Others who are on his hate list would probably be digested too if they
post there.

Originally they were called "antagonists digests", and he used the

Originally "antagonist's digest" - people had a lot of fun bugging him about
that, or calling him "The Antagonist".

terms "antagonist" and "antagonism" as much as "classic". When it
became obvious they are just his way of expressing his hate, they
became simply the "digests".

Perhaps he finally listened to the ones who pointed out how misleading it
was to call it antagonists digest, and using the column heading "antagonist"
instead of "alias" when even by his own description he was including posts
that were not antagonistic.


"Obsessed" doesn't even
begin to describe this behavior, in my view.


How would you describe it?

Manic, perhaps? Dunno, psychology isn't my long suit.


You would need abnormal psychology for him.

Michael Hunt wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
Michael Hunt wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
alias # today total year 3 year 2
year
1

------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
bruce 24 404 2867 1979
0
deco 15 352 3722 2268
0

Obsession with Bruce and Deco noted.


------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
40 43 1126 11687 9100
10033


It didn't long for the list to grow. Did you ever wonder why you
have
so
many antagonists? Do you have any friends left in
rec.music.classical?

He lives to turn the crank on the Holy Digestor.


Hunting asteroids and playing clarinet doesn't keep him busy enough?

Apparently not. He ignored me for about six months starting this
winter, but then began playing catchup with these massive 200-post
digest screeds. He eventually put every single post I made to
sci.astro during this period into a digest.

Does he still post a digest in sci.astro?

Nope, never. I assume it is because he doesn't want his kookery
exposed in front of his peers.

Does he at least make the occassional on-topic post there?

Very, very rarely. His last post was June 13, almost a month ago, and
the last one before then was April 24.

Note that lots of other people
crosspost to sci.astro, yet of all of these, he only digests me.
Others who are on his hate list would probably be digested too if they
post there.

Originally they were called "antagonists digests", and he used the

Originally "antagonist's digest" - people had a lot of fun bugging him about
that, or calling him "The Antagonist".

terms "antagonist" and "antagonism" as much as "classic". When it
became obvious they are just his way of expressing his hate, they
became simply the "digests".

Perhaps he finally listened to the ones who pointed out how misleading it
was to call it antagonists digest, and using the column heading "antagonist"
instead of "alias" when even by his own description he was including posts
that were not antagonistic.

OK -- this was all before my time.


"Obsessed" doesn't even
begin to describe this behavior, in my view.


How would you describe it?

Manic, perhaps? Dunno, psychology isn't my long suit.


You would need abnormal psychology for him.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
Michael Hunt wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
Michael Hunt wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
alias # today total year 3 year 2
year
1

------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
bruce 24 404 2867 1979
0
deco 15 352 3722 2268
0

Obsession with Bruce and Deco noted.


------------- ------- ----- ----- ------ ------
40 43 1126 11687 9100
10033


It didn't long for the list to grow. Did you ever wonder why
you
have
so
many antagonists? Do you have any friends left in
rec.music.classical?

He lives to turn the crank on the Holy Digestor.


Hunting asteroids and playing clarinet doesn't keep him busy
enough?

Apparently not. He ignored me for about six months starting this
winter, but then began playing catchup with these massive 200-post
digest screeds. He eventually put every single post I made to
sci.astro during this period into a digest.

Does he still post a digest in sci.astro?

Nope, never. I assume it is because he doesn't want his kookery
exposed in front of his peers.

Does he at least make the occassional on-topic post there?

Very, very rarely. His last post was June 13, almost a month ago, and
the last one before then was April 24.

Lucky them. What did rec.music.classical do to deserve his attention?


Note that lots of other people
crosspost to sci.astro, yet of all of these, he only digests me.
Others who are on his hate list would probably be digested too if they
post there.

Originally they were called "antagonists digests", and he used the

Originally "antagonist's digest" - people had a lot of fun bugging him
about
that, or calling him "The Antagonist".

terms "antagonist" and "antagonism" as much as "classic". When it
became obvious they are just his way of expressing his hate, they
became simply the "digests".

Perhaps he finally listened to the ones who pointed out how misleading it
was to call it antagonists digest, and using the column heading
"antagonist"
instead of "alias" when even by his own description he was including
posts
that were not antagonistic.

OK -- this was all before my time.


"Obsessed" doesn't even
begin to describe this behavior, in my view.


How would you describe it?

Manic, perhaps? Dunno, psychology isn't my long suit.


You would need abnormal psychology for him.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development