A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MN66 Collimation-better but...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 9th 06, 02:16 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Dan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default MN66 Collimation-better but...

Hello,

So I tried to deal wuth the secondary tilt and that improved the unfocused
star pattern. At higher powers the image stays the same all around the FOV.
At low powers the image begins to change to an oval as it approaches the
edge of field.

Also, at high power, I notice that the extrafocal image shows some
miscollimation while the intrafocal image is very, very close to perfect.

Thanks for your advice.

Dan


  #2  
Old July 9th 06, 11:15 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default MN66 Collimation-better but...


Dan wrote:
Hello,

So I tried to deal wuth the secondary tilt and that improved the unfocused
star pattern. At higher powers the image stays the same all around the FOV.
At low powers the image begins to change to an oval as it approaches the
edge of field.

Also, at high power, I notice that the extrafocal image shows some
miscollimation while the intrafocal image is very, very close to perfect.

Thanks for your advice.



In a MN coma is only corrected for the in-focus position (for a FOV of
about 1.5 deg) that's why you get the effect you describe in the first
sentence. As for the second, my two only suggestions are to keep
refining the tilt of the focuser/secondary and, when you feel all you
could do was done, collimate the scope in-focus with high powers, 300x
and above on a bright stars. That's the way I use to do it (the 2/3
times I had to, that is).

Andrea T.

  #3  
Old July 9th 06, 11:49 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Dan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default MN66 Collimation-better but...

Andrea,

Thanks for the advice, that's just what I'll do.

Dan


wrote in message
s.com...

Dan wrote:
Hello,

So I tried to deal wuth the secondary tilt and that improved the

unfocused
star pattern. At higher powers the image stays the same all around the

FOV.
At low powers the image begins to change to an oval as it approaches the
edge of field.

Also, at high power, I notice that the extrafocal image shows some
miscollimation while the intrafocal image is very, very close to

perfect.

Thanks for your advice.



In a MN coma is only corrected for the in-focus position (for a FOV of
about 1.5 deg) that's why you get the effect you describe in the first
sentence. As for the second, my two only suggestions are to keep
refining the tilt of the focuser/secondary and, when you feel all you
could do was done, collimate the scope in-focus with high powers, 300x
and above on a bright stars. That's the way I use to do it (the 2/3
times I had to, that is).

Andrea T.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Laser versus Non-Laser Collimation [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 44 March 9th 05 02:52 AM
A question on Newtonian collimation Stephen Paul Amateur Astronomy 119 February 8th 04 03:56 AM
Objectives of Collimation LarryG Amateur Astronomy 10 December 12th 03 04:24 AM
Reflector collimation question Joe S. Amateur Astronomy 10 December 8th 03 11:06 PM
Gas giants, seeing and collimation Tom Hole Amateur Astronomy 1 October 25th 03 04:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.