![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
So I tried to deal wuth the secondary tilt and that improved the unfocused star pattern. At higher powers the image stays the same all around the FOV. At low powers the image begins to change to an oval as it approaches the edge of field. Also, at high power, I notice that the extrafocal image shows some miscollimation while the intrafocal image is very, very close to perfect. Thanks for your advice. Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan wrote: Hello, So I tried to deal wuth the secondary tilt and that improved the unfocused star pattern. At higher powers the image stays the same all around the FOV. At low powers the image begins to change to an oval as it approaches the edge of field. Also, at high power, I notice that the extrafocal image shows some miscollimation while the intrafocal image is very, very close to perfect. Thanks for your advice. In a MN coma is only corrected for the in-focus position (for a FOV of about 1.5 deg) that's why you get the effect you describe in the first sentence. As for the second, my two only suggestions are to keep refining the tilt of the focuser/secondary and, when you feel all you could do was done, collimate the scope in-focus with high powers, 300x and above on a bright stars. That's the way I use to do it (the 2/3 times I had to, that is). Andrea T. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrea,
Thanks for the advice, that's just what I'll do. Dan wrote in message s.com... Dan wrote: Hello, So I tried to deal wuth the secondary tilt and that improved the unfocused star pattern. At higher powers the image stays the same all around the FOV. At low powers the image begins to change to an oval as it approaches the edge of field. Also, at high power, I notice that the extrafocal image shows some miscollimation while the intrafocal image is very, very close to perfect. Thanks for your advice. In a MN coma is only corrected for the in-focus position (for a FOV of about 1.5 deg) that's why you get the effect you describe in the first sentence. As for the second, my two only suggestions are to keep refining the tilt of the focuser/secondary and, when you feel all you could do was done, collimate the scope in-focus with high powers, 300x and above on a bright stars. That's the way I use to do it (the 2/3 times I had to, that is). Andrea T. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laser versus Non-Laser Collimation | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 44 | March 9th 05 02:52 AM |
A question on Newtonian collimation | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 119 | February 8th 04 03:56 AM |
Objectives of Collimation | LarryG | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | December 12th 03 04:24 AM |
Reflector collimation question | Joe S. | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | December 8th 03 11:06 PM |
Gas giants, seeing and collimation | Tom Hole | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | October 25th 03 04:55 PM |