Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT!

Brad Guth wrote:

wrote:
Moon and Spica (first magnitude of 0.98)
http://pages.prodigy.net/pam.orman/j...051225_02.html
Date: December 25, 2005
Time: 6:35 a.m. MST
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Camera: Olympus OM-1 35mm SLR on fixed tripod
Film: Fuji Provia 100F slide
Focal length: 600 mm (200mm lens with 3X tele-extender
Apertu f/11 (effective f/32)
Exposure time: approximately 1/2 second
Scanner: Nikon Coolscan LS-2000 (cropped slightly)


This photo proves nothing regarding what the Apollo pictures show.

1 This is a 1/2 second exposure where as the Apollo photos were of much
shorter duration making dimmer objects, like star, not visible.

2 Any photo can be developed and enlarged to bring out less bright
areas and lessen the brightness of other areas. Is that what has
happened to this picture making this photo "Touched up" ?? Have you
contacted this photographer to find this out ??

3 This is not an accurate representation of what the Apollo moon walker
were exposed to, they were taking pictures of very close landscape,
this picture is of two objects that are both very far away and the
difference in brightness between these two objects is not nearly as
great as a suited moon walker or his associated equipment and a star.

4 You are still a kook.

I see that your MIB e-spooks are bringing my PC/internet and Usenet
access to a crawl again. Do you think that's funny?

You really need to find some clues, Brad.

Your continual infomercial-science basis of your buttology mindset
worth of denial is in auto-denial mode, just like that of your good
buddy and partner in crimes against humanity, GW Bush.

Or at the very least somehow manage to keep the few that you still
possess from leaking out all over the floor.

[remaining guthgobble flushed]

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"Get a rope! Say did you see on the National news about a
'Cross burning' in Arkansas? The black guy was scared
****less."
-- "Honest" John the crackah without a brain

On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 16:14:37 -0600, Art Deco
wrote:

Brad Guth wrote:

wrote:
Moon and Spica (first magnitude of 0.98)
http://pages.prodigy.net/pam.orman/j...051225_02.html
Date: December 25, 2005
Time: 6:35 a.m. MST
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Camera: Olympus OM-1 35mm SLR on fixed tripod
Film: Fuji Provia 100F slide
Focal length: 600 mm (200mm lens with 3X tele-extender
Apertu f/11 (effective f/32)
Exposure time: approximately 1/2 second
Scanner: Nikon Coolscan LS-2000 (cropped slightly)


This photo proves nothing regarding what the Apollo pictures show.

1 This is a 1/2 second exposure where as the Apollo photos were of much
shorter duration making dimmer objects, like star, not visible.

2 Any photo can be developed and enlarged to bring out less bright
areas and lessen the brightness of other areas. Is that what has
happened to this picture making this photo "Touched up" ?? Have you
contacted this photographer to find this out ??

3 This is not an accurate representation of what the Apollo moon walker
were exposed to, they were taking pictures of very close landscape,
this picture is of two objects that are both very far away and the
difference in brightness between these two objects is not nearly as
great as a suited moon walker or his associated equipment and a star.

4 You are still a kook.

I see that your MIB e-spooks are bringing my PC/internet and Usenet
access to a crawl again. Do you think that's funny?

You really need to find some clues, Brad.

Maybe he should purge all his non-functional guthware.


Your continual infomercial-science basis of your buttology mindset
worth of denial is in auto-denial mode, just like that of your good
buddy and partner in crimes against humanity, GW Bush.

Or at the very least somehow manage to keep the few that you still
possess from leaking out all over the floor.

Are you sure it isn't too late?


[remaining guthgobble flushed]

Quite the little public servant, you are.

ESL!

--
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
COOSN-266-06-89425

"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely

"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."

"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?

Bookman wrote:

On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 16:14:37 -0600, Art Deco
wrote:

Brad Guth wrote:

wrote:
Moon and Spica (first magnitude of 0.98)
http://pages.prodigy.net/pam.orman/j...051225_02.html
Date: December 25, 2005
Time: 6:35 a.m. MST
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Camera: Olympus OM-1 35mm SLR on fixed tripod
Film: Fuji Provia 100F slide
Focal length: 600 mm (200mm lens with 3X tele-extender
Apertu f/11 (effective f/32)
Exposure time: approximately 1/2 second
Scanner: Nikon Coolscan LS-2000 (cropped slightly)


This photo proves nothing regarding what the Apollo pictures show.

1 This is a 1/2 second exposure where as the Apollo photos were of much
shorter duration making dimmer objects, like star, not visible.

2 Any photo can be developed and enlarged to bring out less bright
areas and lessen the brightness of other areas. Is that what has
happened to this picture making this photo "Touched up" ?? Have you
contacted this photographer to find this out ??

3 This is not an accurate representation of what the Apollo moon walker
were exposed to, they were taking pictures of very close landscape,
this picture is of two objects that are both very far away and the
difference in brightness between these two objects is not nearly as
great as a suited moon walker or his associated equipment and a star.

4 You are still a kook.

I see that your MIB e-spooks are bringing my PC/internet and Usenet
access to a crawl again. Do you think that's funny?

You really need to find some clues, Brad.

Maybe he should purge all his non-functional guthware.

Starting with the operator.


Your continual infomercial-science basis of your buttology mindset
worth of denial is in auto-denial mode, just like that of your good
buddy and partner in crimes against humanity, GW Bush.

Or at the very least somehow manage to keep the few that you still
possess from leaking out all over the floor.

Are you sure it isn't too late?

I figured I should cover all bases just in case.


[remaining guthgobble flushed]

Quite the little public servant, you are.

Thanks, man, my pleasure.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"Get a rope! Say did you see on the National news about a
'Cross burning' in Arkansas? The black guy was scared
****less."
-- "Honest" John the crackah without a brain

On 9/7/06 23:14, in article , "Art Deco"
wrote:

I see that your MIB e-spooks are bringing my PC/internet and Usenet
access to a crawl again. Do you think that's funny?

You really need to find some clues, Brad.

He also needs to stop browsing chickswithdicks.com


Your continual infomercial-science basis of your buttology mindset
worth of denial is in auto-denial mode, just like that of your good
buddy and partner in crimes against humanity, GW Bush.

Or at the very least somehow manage to keep the few that you still
possess from leaking out all over the floor.

[remaining guthgobble flushed]

I wonder if he has his furniture sealed to stop the drool spoiling it.

--

Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in your
formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
Why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE
SCIENCE". Pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in
message m_NOSPAM...



On 9/7/06 23:14, in article , "Art
Deco"
wrote:

I see that your MIB e-spooks are bringing my PC/internet and Usenet
access to a crawl again. Do you think that's funny?

You really need to find some clues, Brad.

He also needs to stop browsing chickswithdicks.com

Projection noted.

Talking to yourself, Hoover?

OJ

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
On 9/7/06 23:14, in article , "Art Deco"
wrote:

I see that your MIB e-spooks are bringing my PC/internet and Usenet
access to a crawl again. Do you think that's funny?

You really need to find some clues, Brad.

He also needs to stop browsing chickswithdicks.com


Your continual infomercial-science basis of your buttology mindset
worth of denial is in auto-denial mode, just like that of your good
buddy and partner in crimes against humanity, GW Bush.

Or at the very least somehow manage to keep the few that you still
possess from leaking out all over the floor.

[remaining guthgobble flushed]

I wonder if he has his furniture sealed to stop the drool spoiling it.

--

No he doesn't but his mother does.