![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The background stars don't shift.
Saul Levy On 22 Jun 2006 17:48:13 -0700, "Hurt" wrote: Good grief. This is trivial. For the most part. 1. Take a picture of the nearby star. 2. Six months later, take another picture of the same star. 3. Measure how far the near star has shifted against the background, in angular units. But you see taking another picture, at LEAST another picture, is the equivalent of taking another measurement. You're masking a picture for an angular measurement. 4. That shift is 2p. [snip] It's 2p only if you can find a reference star that hasn't shifted relative to the star you're trying to determine the distance to. "Gentlemen", you offer nothing to this discussion. It seems your only reason to post is to prove you have some worth. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yes, Virginia, Man NEVER Walked on the Moon... | Ed Conrad | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | September 4th 06 01:20 PM |
Who Says CROP CIRCLES are Man Made? | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 25th 06 05:35 AM |
Off to Early Start in Worldwide Burning of EVOLUTION Textbooks | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 29th 06 09:08 PM |
THE INCREDIBLE BILLY MEIER EXTRATERRESTRIAL CASE -- All the critics can go to hell | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | April 20th 06 08:23 PM |
Space Calendar - January 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 7 | January 29th 04 09:29 PM |