A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

In Favor of Go Fever, Launch the Shuttle Already



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 18th 06, 09:27 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default In Favor of Go Fever, Launch the Shuttle Already

Since the accidental loss of Columbia, NASA has spent billions of
dollars trying to make the shuttle perfectly safe. This cannot be
done. There is no such thing as a foam that can fly 17,000 miles an
hour without some risk of breaking up. For the amount of money we
spend on trying to make the shuttle perfectly safe, we ought to just
build more of them and launch, as is.

I propose that we basically offer the shuttle to fly, as is. Given the
risks involved, we would pay the astronauts a couple million bucks a
piece per flight. If the astronauts don't want to fly, there are
plenty of pilots that can.

  #2  
Old June 18th 06, 10:27 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default In Favor of Go Fever, Launch the Shuttle Already


wrote in message
oups.com...
Since the accidental loss of Columbia, NASA has spent billions of
dollars trying to make the shuttle perfectly safe. This cannot be
done. There is no such thing as a foam that can fly 17,000 miles an
hour without some risk of breaking up. For the amount of money we
spend on trying to make the shuttle perfectly safe, we ought to just
build more of them and launch, as is.

I propose that we basically offer the shuttle to fly, as is. Given the
risks involved, we would pay the astronauts a couple million bucks a
piece per flight. If the astronauts don't want to fly, there are
plenty of pilots that can.

Well, its a view. Its a bit like recruiting mercenaries for an illegal war,
or call it market forces? :-)

I think you miss the point here.

its not just foam, its complexity, age of design and aging components etc,
which is always going to be the problem.

Space is a risky business, and as has been said here before, its trying
toget the balance right. There are no safe ways to get to space, just less
dangerous ones.

Brian


--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________



  #3  
Old June 18th 06, 02:43 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default In Favor of Go Fever, Launch the Shuttle Already

I can maybe see contiuning to fly as is BUT'

The CREW SIZE MUST BE CUT TO ONE THE STATION CAN EASILY MAINTAIN TILL
RESCUE IS AVAILABLE!

Obviously a rescue shuttle is a pipe dream, unless you just launched it
with a single pilot or at most crew of 2 and loaded it with
consumables.

if the rescue shuttle was lucky you unload all the supplies and return
the stranded crew.



if the rescue shuttle gets damaged and cant return safely at least the
now larger stranded crew has more eassential supplies.

lets see worse case it will be crowded and boring.

ISS crew of 2, rescue crew of 2, 7 shuttle crew.

NASA REALLY SHOULD SLASH THE NUMBER OF CREW BEFORE FLYING SO STRANDING
DOESNT MEAN DYING

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Calendar - April 24, 2006 [email protected] History 0 April 24th 06 04:24 PM
Space Calendar - April 24, 2006 [email protected] News 0 April 24th 06 04:24 PM
Space Calendar - March 23, 2006 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 March 23rd 06 04:18 PM
Space Calendar - November 23, 2005 [email protected] News 0 November 23rd 05 05:59 PM
Space Calendar - March 25, 2005 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 March 25th 05 03:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.