A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

External tank jettison question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 9th 06, 04:43 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default External tank jettison question

I have a question about the way the external tank is jettisoned. You've
probably guessed that already.

How much fuel does remain in the ex-tank, when the main engines cut off, and
is the tank then sealed?
I suspect that the shuttle's own intakes are sealed. How is the tank then
moved away from the shuttle? Does it have an active separation, with small
rocket thrusters, or does it just drift away? If there is a significant
amount of fuel left in the tank, would it make any sense to leave the tank
open, so outgassing from the residual fuel would move the tank away? Or is
this in any way dangerous to the orbiter?

TIA

Allan F



  #2  
Old May 10th 06, 12:40 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default External tank jettison question

Allan F wrote:
I have a question about the way the external tank is jettisoned.
You've probably guessed that already.

How much fuel does remain in the ex-tank, when the main engines cut
off,


According to Dennis R. Jenkins's excellent book, Space Shuttle: The
History of the National Space Transportation System (3rd ed), there's
usually around 5-10,000 pounds of LOX and 2-4,000 pounds of LH2
remaining in the tank after separation.

and is the tank then sealed?


The lines that feed the orbiter are sealed to prevent contamination of
the orbiter itself during separation.

I suspect that the shuttle's own intakes are sealed.


Correct.

How is the tank then moved away from the shuttle? Does it have an
active separation, with small rocket thrusters, or does it just drift
away?


Pyrotechnics are used to physically separate the orbiter from the tank.
The orbiter uses its RCS thrusters to move away from the tank.

If there is a significant amount of fuel left in the tank, would it
make any sense to leave the tank open, so outgassing from the
residual fuel would move the tank away? Or is this in any way
dangerous to the orbiter?


The orbiter's RCS can do the job much more precisely than outgassing
could. I'm not a rocket scientist, but I suspect the different levels of
thrust provided by venting the LOX and LH2 feedlines would lead to a
rotation component around the ET's long axis, which may complicate the
end-over-end tumbling used to help the ET break up on reentry.

--Chris
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Historical comparisons Chance Policy 81 March 27th 06 05:54 AM
SIG External Tank Blurrt Space Shuttle 9 October 9th 03 12:52 AM
STS-87 Foam Impact Assessment (reposted) Stuf4 Space Shuttle 11 September 29th 03 02:24 PM
MEDS Created "Window of Vulnerability" Safety Risk Stuf4 Space Shuttle 9 September 27th 03 02:08 AM
Pressure Tank Mass (was Basci question about rocket shapes. Vincent Cate Technology 0 July 24th 03 06:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.