![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a question about the way the external tank is jettisoned. You've
probably guessed that already. How much fuel does remain in the ex-tank, when the main engines cut off, and is the tank then sealed? I suspect that the shuttle's own intakes are sealed. How is the tank then moved away from the shuttle? Does it have an active separation, with small rocket thrusters, or does it just drift away? If there is a significant amount of fuel left in the tank, would it make any sense to leave the tank open, so outgassing from the residual fuel would move the tank away? Or is this in any way dangerous to the orbiter? TIA Allan F |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Allan F wrote:
I have a question about the way the external tank is jettisoned. You've probably guessed that already. How much fuel does remain in the ex-tank, when the main engines cut off, According to Dennis R. Jenkins's excellent book, Space Shuttle: The History of the National Space Transportation System (3rd ed), there's usually around 5-10,000 pounds of LOX and 2-4,000 pounds of LH2 remaining in the tank after separation. and is the tank then sealed? The lines that feed the orbiter are sealed to prevent contamination of the orbiter itself during separation. I suspect that the shuttle's own intakes are sealed. Correct. How is the tank then moved away from the shuttle? Does it have an active separation, with small rocket thrusters, or does it just drift away? Pyrotechnics are used to physically separate the orbiter from the tank. The orbiter uses its RCS thrusters to move away from the tank. If there is a significant amount of fuel left in the tank, would it make any sense to leave the tank open, so outgassing from the residual fuel would move the tank away? Or is this in any way dangerous to the orbiter? The orbiter's RCS can do the job much more precisely than outgassing could. I'm not a rocket scientist, but I suspect the different levels of thrust provided by venting the LOX and LH2 feedlines would lead to a rotation component around the ET's long axis, which may complicate the end-over-end tumbling used to help the ET break up on reentry. --Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Historical comparisons | Chance | Policy | 81 | March 27th 06 05:54 AM |
SIG External Tank | Blurrt | Space Shuttle | 9 | October 9th 03 12:52 AM |
STS-87 Foam Impact Assessment (reposted) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 11 | September 29th 03 02:24 PM |
MEDS Created "Window of Vulnerability" Safety Risk | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 9 | September 27th 03 02:08 AM |
Pressure Tank Mass (was Basci question about rocket shapes. | Vincent Cate | Technology | 0 | July 24th 03 06:47 AM |