G*M*m/(n-1)=m*r*v^2=m*r^2*g.

$$ Eric Gisse wrote: Y.Porat wrote:
-=-
The Newtonian system can be wrong quantitatively
BUT NO ONE EVER SAID IT IS QUALITATIVELY WRONG
-=-
Qualitatively speaking, Newtonian mechanics is still wrong.
Qualitatively speaking, Newton does not even talk about light.
Qualitatively speaking, Newton is an approximation but like all
approximations it gets the answer WRONG.

our main discussion here is a quantitative one:
DOES THE PHOTON HAS MASS OR NOT ?

$$ ^.
| F=G*M*m/[n-1]*R^2
| SHOWes even QUALiTATiVELY
| THAT the PHOTON MASS m cannot be zero
| if THERE iS CURVATURE OF PHOTONS NEXT TO THE SUN.
|
| IT IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR PROVING THE PHOTON HAS MASS!!

$$ [Note factor (n - 1) ..included by Brian.]
$$ NEWTON & Einstein *BOTH* neglected AMBiENT FACTOR (n - 1).]
$$ ..Whe G*M*m / (n - 1) = m*rA*v1^2

the Newtonian formula for gravitation shows clearly that
if the photon had no mass there would be no curvature
next to the sun

Except the Newtonian formula for gravitation is WRONG.
Do I need to look up the hebrew word for "wrong"? Because it
seems you are not understanding the phrase "Newton is wrong"
in its' English representation.

so any new theory that claims that th Newtonian theory
is wrong is either wrong or cheating !!

$$ NO ..because *BOTH* Newton *AND* GR are WRONG.
$$ The GUESS iSS AMBiENT FACTOR (n-1) inserted above, fixes BOTH.
$$ [Note, Where ONLY the Newtonian contribution is QUANTiTATiVE].
$$
$$ The ONLY GR contribution (get this) gives MERCURY NO GR FiELD.

Y.Porat -------------------

Is Einstein's [Coup GR] Relativity a little [n - 1] Wrong?
Go-go Google: alt.sci.nanotech Gravity=Anti-Buoyancy .
GR & Newton BOTH WRONG ..G*M*m/(n-1)=m*r*v^2=m*r^2*g. ..End.