A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Recent BS posts



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 27th 06, 05:35 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts

Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - it enables them to
conveniently read the response without needing to scroll down. The only
time bottom-posting is really required, is when multiple points are being
addressed sequentially. With quoted text clearly indented, only the most
dimwitted reader has difficulty discerning the responder's text from that
which is being replied to. Thus, only the dimwitted have a problem with it.

RRRREOWR!


"Tweak" wrote in message . ..

What cracks me up is a top posting git taking such a superior tone on a
netiquette issue.

Oh, and "meow".
--
Tweak



  #2  
Old March 27th 06, 05:57 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts


"I" wrote in message
...

Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - it enables them to
conveniently read the response without needing to scroll down. The only
time bottom-posting is really required, is when multiple points are being
addressed sequentially. With quoted text clearly indented, only the most
dimwitted reader has difficulty discerning the responder's text from that
which is being replied to. Thus, only the dimwitted have a problem with
it.

RRRREOWR!


True for email, not true for public forums.


  #3  
Old March 27th 06, 08:49 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts

Hmm, Tweak replied, but since he didn't even offer the courtesy
of top-posting, I shall ignore whatever useless turd he dropped.



"Tweak" wrote in message . ..
In article ,
says...
Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - it enables them to
conveniently read the response without needing to scroll down. The only
time bottom-posting is really required, is when multiple points are being
addressed sequentially. With quoted text clearly indented, only the most
dimwitted reader has difficulty discerning the responder's text from that
which is being replied to. Thus, only the dimwitted have a problem with it.

RRRREOWR!


"Tweak" wrote in message . ..

What cracks me up is a top posting git taking such a superior tone on a
netiquette issue.

Oh, and "meow".
--
Tweak


Another clueless, top posting git posting in defense of the brotherhood
of clapperheads.

Suprise suprise.

How are we ever going to get a good cascade if you keep top posting?


M. .:M
MMMM. .:MMMM
MMMMMMMM .:MMMMMMM
:MMHHHMMMMHMM. .:MMMMMMMMM:. .:MMHHMHMM:
:MMHHIIIHMMMM.:MMHHHHIIIHHMMMM. .:MMHIHIIHHM:
MMMHIIIIHHMMMIIHHMHHIIIIIHHMMMMMMHHHIIIIHHM:
:MMHIIIIIHMMMMMMMHHIIIIIIHHHMMMMMHHII:::IHM.
MH:I:::IHHMMMMMHHII:::IIHHMMMHHHMMM:I:IHMM
:MHI:HHIHMMHHIIHII::.::IIHMMHHIHHMMM::HMM:
MI::HHMMIIM:IIHII::..::HM:MHHII:::IHHMM:
MMMHII::..:::IHMMHHHMHHMMI:::...::IHM:
:MHHI::....::::HMMMMMMHHI::.. ..:::HM:
:MI:.:MH:.....:HMMMMHHMIHMMHHI:HH.:M
M:.I..MHHHHHMMMIHMMMMHMMHHHHHMMH:.:M.
M:.H..H I:HM:MHMHI:IM:I:MM:: MMM:M:
:M:HM:.M I:MHMIIMMIIHM I:MM::.:MMI:M.
'M::MM:IMH:MMII MMHIMHI :M::IIHMM:MM
MH:HMMHIHMMMMMMHMMIMHIIHHHHIMMHHMM
MI:MMMMHI:::::IMM:MHI:::IMMMMHIM
:IMHIHMMMMMM:MMMMMHHHHMMMHI:M
HI:IMIHMMMM:MMMMMMHHHMI:.:M .....
............M::..:HMMMMIMHIIHMMMMHII:M:::''''
....:::MHI:.:HMMMMMMMMHHHMHHI::M:::::::''''''
'' ...:MHI:.::MMHHHMHMIHMMMMHH.MI..........
'' ...MHI::.::MHHHHIHHMM:::IHM '''
' IMH.::..::HMMHMMMH::..:HM:
:M:.H.IHMIIII::IIMHMMM:H.MH
IMMMH:HI:MMIMI:IHI:HIMIHM:
.MMI:.HIHMIMI:IHIHMMHIHI:MIM.
.MHI:::HHIIIIIHHI:IIII::::M:IM.
.MMHII:::IHIII::::::IIIIIIHMHIIM
MHHHI::.:IHHII:::.:::IIIIHMHIIHM:
MHHHII::..::MII::.. ..:IIIHHHII:IM.
.MHHII::....:MHII::. .:IHHHI::IIHMM.
MMHHII::.....:IHMI:. ..:IHII::..:HHMM
MHHII:::......:IIHI...:IHI::.....::HM:
:MMH:::........ ...::..::.... ...:IHMM
IMHIII:::.......... .........::IHMM.
:MHIII::::...... .......::IHMM:
MHHIII::::... ......::IHMM:
IMHHIII:::... .....::IIHMM,
:MHHIII:::I:::... ....:::I:::IIHMM
MMHHIII::IHI:::...........:::IIH:IHMM
:MMHHII:IIHHI::::::.....:::::IH:IHMIM
MMMHHII:IIHHI:::::::::::::IHI:IIHM:M.
MMMHHIII::IHHII:::::::::IHI:IIIHMM:M:
:MMHHHIII::IIIHHII::::IHI..IIIHHM:MHM
:MMMHHII:..:::IHHMMHHHHI:IIIIHHMM:MIM
.MMMMHHII::.:IHHMM:::IIIIIIHHHMM:MI.M
.MMMMHHII::.:IHHMM:::IIIIIIHHHMM:MI.M
.MMMMHHMHHII:::IHHMM:::IIIIIHHHHMM:MI.IM.
.MMHMMMHHHII::::IHHMM::I&&&IHHHHMM:MMH::IM.
.MMHHMHMHHII:::.::IHMM::IIIIHHHMMMM:MMH::IHM
:MHIIIHMMHHHII:::IIHMM::IIIHHMMMMM::MMMMHHHMM.
MMHI:IIHMMHHHI::::IHMM:IIIIHHHMMMM:MMMHI::IHMM.
MMH:::IHMMHHHHI:::IHMM:IIIHHHHMMMM:MMHI:.:IHHMM.
:MHI:::IHMHMHHII::IHMM:IIIHHHMMMMM:MHH::.::IHHM:
'MHHI::IHMMHMHHII:IHMM:IIHHHHMMMM:MMHI:...:IHHMM.
:MHII:IIHMHIHHIIIIHMM:IIHHHHMMMM:MHHI:...:IIHMM:
'MHIII:IHHMIHHHIIHHHMM:IHHHMMMMM:MHHI:..::IIHHM:
:MHHIIIHHMIIHHHIHHHMM:HHHHMMMMM:MHII::::IIIHHMM
MHHIIIIHMMIHHHIIHHMM:HHHHMMMM:MMHHIIHIIIIIHHMM.
'MHHIIIHHMIIHHIIIHMM:HHHMMMMH:MHHMHII:IIIHHHMM:
'MHHIIIHMMIHHHIHHMM:HHHMMMHH:MMIMMMHHHIIIHHMM:
'MHHIIHHMIHHHHHMMM:HHHMMMH:MIMMMMMMMMMMHIHHM:
'MHIIIHMMIHHHHHMM:HHHMMMH:IMMMMMHHIHHHMMHHM'
:MHHIIHMIHHHHHMM:HHHMMMM:MMHMMHIHMHI:IHHHM
MHHIIHM:HHHHHMM:HHHMMMM:MMMHIHHIHMM:HHIHM
MHHIHM:IHHHHMM:HHHHMM:MMHMIIHMIMMMHMHIM:
:MHIHMH:HHHHMM:HHHHMM:MMHIIHMIIHHMMHIHM:
MMHHMH:HHHHMM:HHHHMM:MHHIHMMIIIMMMIIHM'
'MMMMH:HHHHMM:HHHMM:MHHHIMMHIIII::IHM:
:MMHM:HHHHMM:HHHMM:MHIHIMMHHIIIIIHM:
MMMM:HHHHMM:HHHHM:MHHMIMMMHHHIHHM:MMMM.
:MMM:IHHHMM:HHHMM:MHHMIIMMMHHMM:MMMMMMM:
:MMM:IHHHM:HHHHMM:MMHHHIHHMMM:MMMMMMMMMM
MHM:IHHHM:HHHMMM:MMHHHHIIIMMIIMMMMMMMMM
MHM:HHHHM:HHHMMM:HMMHHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMM:
.MI:MM:MHHMM:MHMMHMHHMMMMHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMM'
:IM:MMIM:M:MM:MH:MM:MH:MMMMMHHHHHMMMMMMMM'
:IM:M:IM:M:HM:IMIHM:IMI:MMMMMHHHMMMMMM:'
'M:MHM:HM:MN:HMIHM::M' '::MMMMMMM:'
'M'HMM'M''M''HM'I'

--
Tweak



  #4  
Old March 27th 06, 11:14 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts

I know. I'm just tweaking his buttons.

p.s. I find that trimming extraneous content is FAR more
courteous and important to readability than bottom-posting.


"Jeff Findley" wrote in message ...

Top posting is not the custom in Usenet groups. Others have already explained why. If you need more information, try this:



  #5  
Old March 28th 06, 02:54 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts


"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
...

IMHO, I like the bottom posting method better, as then I don't have to
scroll down to see what exactly the reply is in response to.


I don't care if it's top posted or bottom posted as long as it's on topic
and is posted to the appropriate group and not every unrelated newsgroup on
the net.

Randy
www.vernarockets.com


  #6  
Old March 28th 06, 05:23 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts

"I" wrote:

:Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) -

Hogwash!

plonk

--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
soul with evil."
-- Socrates
  #7  
Old March 28th 06, 01:25 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts

You plonk people because you disagree with their opinion on top-posting?

O.k....

"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message ...
:Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) -

Hogwash!

plonk



  #8  
Old March 28th 06, 02:45 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts


"I" wrote in message
...
You plonk people because you disagree with their opinion on top-posting?

O.k....


You also seem to say little that is on topic. I'm sure Fred isn't the first
or the last person to killfile you.

Jeff
--
Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.


  #9  
Old March 28th 06, 04:42 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts

"Jeff Findley" wrote:

:"I" wrote in message
...
: You plonk people because you disagree with their opinion on top-posting?
:
: O.k....
:
:You also seem to say little that is on topic. I'm sure Fred isn't the first
r the last person to killfile you.

Not given his attitudes. I, like a lot of folks, killfile the
stupidly annoying. Just trying to improve the signal to noise ratio
at my end of the wire....

--
"It's always different. It's always complex. But at some point,
somebody has to draw the line. And that somebody is always me....
I am the law."
-- Buffy, The Vampire Slayer
  #10  
Old March 28th 06, 04:49 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recent BS posts

"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message ...

Not given his attitudes. I, like a lot of folks, killfile the
stupidly annoying. Just trying to improve the signal to noise ratio
at my end of the wire....


....by producing nothing of merit to add to any of the newsgroups you're x-posting to?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new idea for old posts at uk.sci.astronomy granite stone UK Astronomy 4 March 17th 06 06:16 PM
Recent impact event on Mars [email protected] Policy 0 November 18th 05 07:03 PM
Recent impact event on Mars [email protected] History 0 November 18th 05 07:03 PM
Solar Electrons, Auroras Associated With Recent Geomagnetic Storms Ron Baalke Science 0 December 11th 03 07:29 PM
Recent Warming of Arctic May Affect Worldwide Climate Ron Baalke Science 0 October 24th 03 12:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.