Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE.

Henri Wilson wrote:
I say photons ARE their own medium....individual packages
of 'aether' if you like.

$$ Planck PRESSURE Pp ..is ambient AEther PRESSURE P_p.
$$ UNiVERSAL Planck PRESSURE Pp = no*h*fL ..a VARiABLE;
$$ = nL*no*h*c / wl
$$ = Na*h*fL / vm
$$ = Ra*h*fL / vm*k
$$ = Na*na*hbar*c / vm*rA
$$ = Ra*na*hbar*c / vm*k*rA
$$ = Ra*na*Mp*lp*c^2 / vm*k*rA
$$ = Na*na*Mp*lp*c^2 / vm*rA.
$$ VOLUME vm constant.
$$ Radius rA = (+OR-) sqrt{G*M1/(n-1)*g} = G*M1/(n-1)*v1^2.
$$ Radius rA = (+OR-) sqrt{G*M1/(n-1)*g} = G*M1/(n-1)*rA*g.
$$ Loschmit Constant no = Na/vm = Ra/m*k - (mol part)/m^3.
$$
$$ Hope this helps, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE.

$$ [Loschmidt NUMBER ..spelling CORRECTED]; Henri Wilson wrote: -=-
I say photons ARE their own medium....individual packages
of 'aether' if you like.

$$ Planck PRESSURE Pp ..is AMBiENT AEther PRESSURE P_p.
$$ UNiVERSAL Planck PRESSURE Pp = no*h*fL ..a VARiABLE;
$$ = nL*no*h*c / wl
$$ = Na*h*fL / vm
$$ = Ra*h*fL / vm*k
$$ = Na*na*hbar*c / vm*rA
$$ = Ra*na*hbar*c / vm*k*rA
$$ Volume, vm constant.
$$ Radius, rA = (+ OR -) sqrt{G*M1 / (n-1)*g} = G*M1 / (n-1)*v1^2.
$$ Radius, rA = (+ OR -) sqrt{G*M1 / (n-1)*g} = G*M1 / (n-1)*rA*g.
$$ Loschmidt NUMBER, no = Na / vm = Ra / vm*k - (mol part) / m^3.
$$
$$ Solar energy VARiABLE, Pp*vm.
$$ Planck PRESSURE*Molar Volume, Pp*vm ..MOLAR Planck, SOHO energy;
$$ = no*vm*h*fL ..1400 Watt/m^2 @ 1*AU;
$$ = Na*h*fL ..Avagadro's NUMBER Na;
$$ = Ra*h*fL / k ..the PARTiTiON, k;
$$ = F*h*fL / {e} ..the Faraday, F.
$$
$$ PERHAPs this ought help, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE.

"brian a m stuckless" wrote in message
...
Henri Wilson wrote:
I say photons ARE their own medium....individual packages
of 'aether' if you like.


You classical thinkers have it all wrong. Space is a cloud.
And like a cloud, the structure forms from the
subcritical/supercritical behavior of the components.
A persistent phase transition between water and air, or
gravity and cosmic expansion, is the source of the
structure in which they reside. The chaotic motion
that exists at such transition states, such as the precise
temp water changes to air, is a combination of classical
and quantum behavior. It is the vibrations, the chaotic
motion inherent in the components of organized systems
that create the space they reside.

Neither field alone, quantum or classical, could possibly
describe a real world self organized system. Only when
nature is reduced to it's degenerate forms, static or
chaotic, classical or quantum, particle or wave, can
one or the other fields work.

But either works only for it's degenerate realms.

Reality is both and neither at the same time.
Your attempts to reduce the universe to equations
of state is foolish, and in fact Dark Age science.

The basic problem keeping us in the Dark Ages is
a simple frame of reference mistake, very simple.

We assumed long ago that the properties of the physical
universe will define reality and then ultimately life.
You look for the simplest the universe has to offer
to derive fundamental law.

Dummies, all of ya! It's the other way around.
Life, the most complex the universe has to offer, displays
best the universal properties that are responsible for
our reality and our existence.

Life....Darwin...in the abstract, is the true source of fundamental
law. We should seek out the abstract properties of complexity
NOT simplicity to see the truth of our reality. Modern science
is ...in fact....backwards.

Chaos theory, now called complexity science, is the Enlightenment.

And it works everywhere, every discipline.
Learn them all at once, and compare their commonalities
for the first time. Suddenly it all makes sense, the light
switch is turned on.

http://necsi.org/publications/dcs/index.html
http://www.calresco.org/sos/sosfaq.htm
http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/complexity/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_Physics
http://icam.lanl.gov/
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~steinh/
http://www.santafe.edu/sfi/People/ka...tigations.html

http://www.calresco.org/themes.htm


Nice wallpaper though, Someday you'll walk into a
room and see your equations papered on all four
walls. Like bankrupt stock certificates, that's all
it's really good for.


Jonathan

s





$$ Planck PRESSURE Pp ..is ambient AEther PRESSURE P_p.
$$ UNiVERSAL Planck PRESSURE Pp = no*h*fL ..a VARiABLE;
$$ = nL*no*h*c / wl
$$ = Na*h*fL / vm
$$ = Ra*h*fL / vm*k
$$ = Na*na*hbar*c / vm*rA
$$ = Ra*na*hbar*c / vm*k*rA
$$ = Ra*na*Mp*lp*c^2 / vm*k*rA
$$ = Na*na*Mp*lp*c^2 / vm*rA.
$$ VOLUME vm constant.
$$ Radius rA = (+OR-) sqrt{G*M1/(n-1)*g} = G*M1/(n-1)*v1^2.
$$ Radius rA = (+OR-) sqrt{G*M1/(n-1)*g} = G*M1/(n-1)*rA*g.
$$ Loschmit Constant no = Na/vm = Ra/m*k - (mol part)/m^3.
$$
$$ Hope this helps, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE.

$$ [Loschmidt NUMBER ..spelling CORRECTED]; Henri Wilson wrote: -=-
I say photons ARE their own medium....individual packages
of 'aether' if you like.

$$ Planck PRESSURE Pp ..is AMBiENT AEther PRESSURE P_p.
$$ UNiVERSAL Planck PRESSURE Pp = no*h*fL ..a VARiABLE;
$$ = nL*no*h*c / wl
$$ = Na*h*fL / vm
$$ = Ra*h*fL / vm*k
$$ = Na*na*hbar*c / vm*rA
$$ = Ra*na*hbar*c / vm*k*rA
$$ Volume, vm constant.
$$ Radius, rA = (+ OR -) sqrt{G*M1 / (n-1)*g} = G*M1 / (n-1)*v1^2.
$$ Radius, rA = (+ OR -) sqrt{G*M1 / (n-1)*g} = G*M1 / (n-1)*rA*g.
$$ Loschmidt NUMBER, no = Na / vm = Ra / vm*k - (mol part) / m^3.
$$
$$ AMBiENT energy VARiABLE, Pp*vm.
$$ Planck PRESSURE*Molar Volume, Pp*vm ..MOLAR Planck, SOHO energy;
$$ = no*vm*h*fL ..1400 Watt/m^2 @ 1*AU;
$$ = Na*h*fL ..Avagadro's NUMBER Na;
$$ = Ra*h*fL / k ..the PARTiTiON, k;
$$ = F*h*fL / {e} ..the Faraday, F.
$$
$$ This ought PERHAPs help, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE.

jonathan wrote: -=-SNiP-=-
-=- General COMPLEXiTY Cg=Ra/[S]=eK*[entropy S]/LaGrangian.-=-
"brian a m stuckless wrote in message Henri Wilson wrote:
| I say photons ARE their own medium....individual packages
| of 'aether' if you like.

You classical thinkers have it all wrong. Space is a cloud.
And like a cloud, the structure forms from the -=-

Reality is both and neither at the same time.
Your attempts to reduce the universe to equations
of state is foolish, and in fact Dark Age science.

Dummies, all of ya! Jonathan s
Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE.

"brian a m stuckless" wrote in message
...
$$ [Loschmidt NUMBER ..spelling CORRECTED]; Henri Wilson wrote: -=-
I say photons ARE their own medium....individual packages
of 'aether' if you like.

$$ Planck PRESSURE Pp ..is AMBiENT AEther PRESSURE P_p.
$$ UNiVERSAL Planck PRESSURE Pp = no*h*fL ..a VARiABLE;
$$ = nL*no*h*c / wl
$$ = Na*h*fL / vm
$$ = Ra*h*fL / vm*k
$$ = Na*na*hbar*c / vm*rA
$$ = Ra*na*hbar*c / vm*k*rA
$$ Volume, vm constant.
$$ Radius, rA = (+ OR -) sqrt{G*M1 / (n-1)*g} = G*M1 / (n-1)*v1^2.
$$ Radius, rA = (+ OR -) sqrt{G*M1 / (n-1)*g} = G*M1 / (n-1)*rA*g.
$$ Loschmidt NUMBER, no = Na / vm = Ra / vm*k - (mol part) / m^3.
$$
$$ AMBiENT energy VARiABLE, Pp*vm.
$$ Planck PRESSURE*Molar Volume, Pp*vm ..MOLAR Planck, SOHO energy;
$$ = no*vm*h*fL ..1400 Watt/m^2 @ 1*AU;
$$ = Na*h*fL ..Avagadro's NUMBER Na;
$$ = Ra*h*fL / k ..the PARTiTiON, k;
$$ = F*h*fL / {e} ..the Faraday, F.
$$
$$ This ought PERHAPs help, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE.

jonathan wrote: -=-SNiP-=-
-=- General COMPLEXiTY Cg=Ra/[S]=eK*[entropy S]/LaGrangian.-=-
"brian a m stuckless wrote in message Henri Wilson wrote:
| I say photons ARE their own medium....individual packages
| of 'aether' if you like.

You classical thinkers have it all wrong. Space is a cloud.
And like a cloud, the structure forms from the -=-

Reality is both and neither at the same time.
Your attempts to reduce the universe to equations
of state is foolish, and in fact Dark Age science.

Dummies, all of ya! Jonathan s
Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE.


Let me give you a clue to communicating ideas to others.
Mathematics is simply short hand for plain English.
If you unable to express your mathematics in plain
English either; you don't understand the meaning of
the math, or are too arrogant to expand. Arrogance
flows from insecurity.

So when you say that plank pressure is a variable, why
don't you just simply say which constant you consider
not to be. Is it the Planck force, the speed of light,
Planck's constant or the gravitational constant that
you consider to vary?

Let me show you how easy this form of communication can be.
Perhaps instead of a maze of incomprehensible equations you
were to say only this.


"Plank Pressure is a variable because_______ is not really a
constant after all. And the reason is______."


Notice several things about this approach. One, it took all of
twenty words in one or two sentences. The other advantage
is that anyone can figure out what you are talking about
without making them work for it. Speaking in tongues is
all fine and well, great fun sometimes. But such experiments
in language should be about improving, or somehow
enhancing communication. Such flights of fancy shouldn't
be about hashing it into petty wallpaper.

As to your reply, how does plank pressure define life?

Don't you see, the complexity approach can translate
the properties of life to quantum motion, and back again.

Your chosen method, reducing to parts, CANNOT ever
hope to do that. As a result you'll never understand
WHY things tremble, and WHY the whole acts with
invisible hands.

You'll never understand WHY quantum and classical motion
exists, their dependencies on each other and how life
shows the way.


Jonathan



"Their height in heaven comforts not,
Their glory nought to me;
'T was best imperfect, as it was;
I'm finite, I can't see.

The house of supposition,
The glimmering frontier
That skirts the acres of perhaps,
To me shows insecure.

The wealth I had contented me;
If 't was a meaner size,
Then I had counted it until
It pleased my narrow eyes

Better than larger values,
However true their show;
This timid life of evidence
Keeps pleading, "I don't know."



By E Dickinson



s