A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Jupiter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 8th 06, 03:20 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jupiter

Got up early on Tues. to look at Jupiter. It was about 45 deg high in the
south, and seeing was average (3/5). However, it was so bright that it
almost "hurt" to view in my F4.7 newt. Not quite as bad as looking at the
moon without a filter, but close. I tried a few colored filters, but none
seemed to help. They either made it too dark or lowered the contrast.

What do folks use to dim the brightness of Jupiter? Maybe I need a
polarizer? Thanks.

-John


  #2  
Old February 8th 06, 03:54 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jupiter

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 09:20:27 -0600, John Banister wrote:

Got up early on Tues. to look at Jupiter. It was about 45 deg high in the
south, and seeing was average (3/5). However, it was so bright that it
almost "hurt" to view in my F4.7 newt. Not quite as bad as looking at the
moon without a filter, but close. I tried a few colored filters, but none
seemed to help. They either made it too dark or lowered the contrast.

What do folks use to dim the brightness of Jupiter? Maybe I need a
polarizer? Thanks.

-John




Try a neutral density filter. One source would be www.telescope.com


--
Martin R. Howell
"The Astro Post"
www.theastropost.com
  #3  
Old February 8th 06, 05:05 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jupiter

John Banister wrote:
Got up early on Tues. to look at Jupiter. It was about 45 deg high in the
south, and seeing was average (3/5). However, it was so bright that it
almost "hurt" to view in my F4.7 newt. Not quite as bad as looking at the
moon without a filter, but close. I tried a few colored filters, but none
seemed to help. They either made it too dark or lowered the contrast.

What do folks use to dim the brightness of Jupiter? Maybe I need a
polarizer? Thanks.

-John



As someone else pointed out, you can use a ND filter if brightness is a
concern.

Also - a filter I find helps bring out detail on Jupiter is an FLD.
  #4  
Old February 8th 06, 05:06 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jupiter

Try an aperture mask. This also often helps on nights with relatively poor
seeing. It also works well on any bright object, except the Sun of course.
Just cut a piece of relatively thick cardboard and put a hole in it. Try
different sized holes, but I would not go smaller than one to two inches.

--- Dave
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinprick holes in a colorless sky
Let inspired figures of light pass by
The Mighty Light of ten thousand suns
Challenges infinity, and is soon gone




"John Banister" wrote in message
...
Got up early on Tues. to look at Jupiter. It was about 45 deg high in the
south, and seeing was average (3/5). However, it was so bright that it almost
"hurt" to view in my F4.7 newt. Not quite as bad as looking at the moon
without a filter, but close. I tried a few colored filters, but none seemed
to help. They either made it too dark or lowered the contrast.

What do folks use to dim the brightness of Jupiter? Maybe I need a polarizer?
Thanks.

-John



  #5  
Old February 8th 06, 07:04 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jupiter

David Nakamoto wrote:
Try an aperture mask. This also often helps on nights with relatively poor
seeing. It also works well on any bright object, except the Sun of course.
Just cut a piece of relatively thick cardboard and put a hole in it. Try
different sized holes, but I would not go smaller than one to two inches.

--- Dave


Would an aperture mask that cuts light out of the center of the aperture
work (think bigger central obstruction), but still maintain the
resolution of a big scope?

Shawn
  #6  
Old February 8th 06, 07:13 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jupiter

Shawn wrote:
Would an aperture mask that cuts light out of the center of the aperture
work (think bigger central obstruction), but still maintain the
resolution of a big scope?


No. In fact, that would probably combine the worst of both worlds.
You have just about all of the effects of the decoherence as a result
of turbulence, and get to add in all the usual effects of a central
obstruction. I wouldn't recommend it.

--
Brian Tung
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html
  #7  
Old February 9th 06, 06:34 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jupiter

I usually use more power, until the planet nearly fills the fov.
Last fall, watching Mars, I actually put on some sunglasses
(polarized).
Seemed to work fine.
But if seeing will support it, you can "dim" the image by crankin' up
the power.
Regards,
Uncle Bob

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GravityShieldingUpdates1.1 Stan Byers Research 3 March 23rd 05 01:28 PM
Jupiter Events ( December 2003 ) Brendan DJ Murphy UK Astronomy 0 November 30th 03 12:36 PM
Jupiter Events (November 2003) Brendan DJ Murphy UK Astronomy 0 November 3rd 03 06:43 PM
Incontrovertible Evidence Cash Astronomy Misc 1 August 24th 03 07:22 PM
Incontrovertible Evidence Cash Amateur Astronomy 6 August 24th 03 07:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.