A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 4th 06, 09:05 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA


Brad,

Let the topic die. You've shown you know less about Nasa, Apollo, the
Federal Government, Physics, Chemistry, and Special Education.

You are really starting to make the charitable special ed teacher in me...

//CRINGE//

I don't mean that as an attack, or to be snarky. I mean that I feel like
I just found out that the person I thought was an asshole, turned out to
be seriously mentally ill.

Let the moon hoax die.

Bob

Brad Guth wrote:
a multi-page rant, demonstrating his less than complete knowledge of

the subject...
  #2  
Old February 4th 06, 11:47 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA


click message block sender

and the world is a happier place

"Robert Juliano" wrote in message
...

Brad,

Let the topic die. You've shown you know less about Nasa, Apollo, the
Federal Government, Physics, Chemistry, and Special Education.

You are really starting to make the charitable special ed teacher in me...

//CRINGE//

I don't mean that as an attack, or to be snarky. I mean that I feel like I
just found out that the person I thought was an asshole, turned out to be
seriously mentally ill.

Let the moon hoax die.

Bob

Brad Guth wrote:
a multi-page rant, demonstrating his less than complete knowledge of

the subject...



  #3  
Old February 5th 06, 12:22 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA

"Tater Schuld" wrote in message ...

click message block sender

and the world is a happier place


You're overlooking Brad's value as an entertainment provider.

In my mind's eye, I see him as a cross between Emo Philips,
Rev. Jim from "Taxi", and the "French Insult Knight" from MP+THG.



  #4  
Old February 5th 06, 01:33 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA

Me wrote:
"Tater Schuld" wrote in message ...

click message block sender

and the world is a happier place



You're overlooking Brad's value as an entertainment provider.

In my mind's eye, I see him as a cross between Emo Philips,
Rev. Jim from "Taxi", and the "French Insult Knight" from MP+THG.




But, mostly the French guy.
  #5  
Old February 5th 06, 01:46 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA


"Dave Grayvis" wrote in message
t...

But, mostly the French guy.


More like a dung beetle, buried in crap.

Randy


  #6  
Old February 6th 06, 04:25 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA

Robert Juliano; Let the moon hoax die.
But, but, but Sir Juliano, they haven't yet figured out how the heck
they're going back there with only a 60:1 rocket/payload.

It seems they're also having a rather nasty time figuring out how to
stay on top of all that bone dry quick-sand (aka quick-powder) of the
naked and thus highly reactive lunar surface that's not likely offering
more than a surface clumping tension worth of 5 g/cm2.
-
Brad Guth

  #7  
Old February 6th 06, 04:43 PM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA

Brad Guth wrote:
Robert Juliano; Let the moon hoax die.


But, but, but Sir Juliano, they haven't yet figured out how the heck
they're going back there with only a 60:1 rocket/payload.


And YOU haven't figured out how not to crosspost your *mental* ascii
diarrhea to rec.models.rockets.


It seems they're also having a rather nasty time figuring out how to
stay on top of all that bone dry quick-sand (aka quick-powder) of the
naked and thus highly reactive lunar surface that's not likely offering
more than a surface clumping tension worth of 5 g/cm2.
-
Brad Guth


Wishing you were on that lunar surface right now....

Ted Novak
TRA#5512
IEAS#75
  #8  
Old February 10th 06, 02:00 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA

There was no lunar landings .. all a hoax.

If you believe that parachutes opened on the splashdown
capsule at mach ten and didn't snap off or completely
incinerate in a flash, I've got prime Ocean front property
in New Mexico for you cheap.

Think about it.
Steve

  #9  
Old February 10th 06, 02:17 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA

Parachutes weren't operated while at "mach ten", although that has
little if anything to do with the matter of their not going to and
especially of their not walking upon our moon.

Reentering Earth's atmosphere and of utilizing parachutes prior to
their being much below 10,000' is quite doable. I'm not sure what the
incoming velocity is once cruising past 10,000' but, by that point it's
certainly not "mach ten".

Actually, if they had good faith in their automation and deployment
timing, 5,000' parachute opening should be just fine and dandy. I
believe the first of the smaller/drogue chutes had been deployed at
24,000'.
-
Brad Guth

  #10  
Old February 10th 06, 02:31 AM posted to rec.models.rockets,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA

"Steve" wrote in message oups.com...
There was no lunar landings .. all a hoax.

If you believe that parachutes opened on the splashdown
capsule at mach ten and didn't snap off or completely
incinerate in a flash, I've got prime Ocean front property
in New Mexico for you cheap.


If you believe that the main 'chutes opened at mach 10, which
they didn't, you're even MORE clueless than the folks who buy
NM ocean front property.

Think about it.


The designers already have, and did a remarkable job.

Try thinking yourself, sometime. It's a wonderful feeling!



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MOON LANDING HOAX VATICAN - MAKES IT TO WIKIPEDIA Mutz Amateur Astronomy 1 December 27th 05 01:06 AM
Apollo Buzz alDredge Misc 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla Astronomy Misc 15 July 25th 04 02:57 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla UK Astronomy 11 July 25th 04 02:57 PM
significant addition to section 25 of the faq heat UK Astronomy 1 April 15th 04 01:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.