|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
September 28th 05, 07:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
'Intelligent Design' becoming LAW!
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:
snip The appendix, a non-functional second stomach. Genetic diseases that convey immunity to another disease (sickle cell anemia - malaria, cystic fibrosis - cholera). I'm sure some of the people who've suffered a detached retina would like a word or two with the silly ******* that arranged our eyeball-linings inside-out. And for what on earth do snakes need a pelvis? -- Odysseus 
|
|
#2
September 28th 05, 02:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Odysseus wrote:
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote: snip The appendix, a non-functional second stomach. Genetic diseases that convey immunity to another disease (sickle cell anemia - malaria, cystic fibrosis - cholera). I'm sure some of the people who've suffered a detached retina would like a word or two with the silly ******* that arranged our eyeball-linings inside-out. Obviously a committee-driven compromise design. And for what on earth do snakes need a pelvis? Just in case they need to re-evolve legs... Mark L. Fergerson
|
|
#3
September 28th 05, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Mark Fergerson wrote:
Odysseus wrote: And for what on earth do snakes need a pelvis? Just in case they need to re-evolve legs... I think you mean, they're attachment points in case the Designer decides to offer legs as optional equipment. -- Bobby Bryant Austin, Texas
|
|
#4
September 28th 05, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bobby D. Bryant" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Mark Fergerson wrote: Odysseus wrote: And for what on earth do snakes need a pelvis? Just in case they need to re-evolve legs... I think you mean, they're attachment points in case the Designer decides to offer legs as optional equipment. Well you know that modular design is all the rage in the IT world, so one could foresee that it would catch on pretty quick in ID as well.
|
|
#5
September 28th 05, 09:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The snake Pelvis is used for dance.
Most of the people I have talked to who push intelligent design seem like they wouldn't know it if they saw it. dan "Bobby D. Bryant" wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Mark Fergerson wrote: Odysseus wrote: And for what on earth do snakes need a pelvis? Just in case they need to re-evolve legs... I think you mean, they're attachment points in case the Designer decides to offer legs as optional equipment. -- Bobby Bryant Austin, Texas
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FOUL BALLS TEAM UP -- Evolutionists Try to Kayo Intelligent Design -- Dover | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 5 | October 10th 05 02:24 PM |
| Is NASA really gonna use the in-line cargo design? | richard schumacher | Space Shuttle | 56 | August 13th 05 12:46 AM |
| New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design | Nick | Astronomy Misc | 5 | August 7th 05 12:10 AM |
| Death Sentence for the Hubble? | MrPepper11 | Policy | 437 | May 4th 05 03:56 PM |
| Pre-Columbia Criticism of NASA's Safety Culture in the late 1990's | Greg Kuperberg | Space Shuttle | 68 | September 18th 03 02:35 PM |
Linear Mode
