![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello
I am thinking of getting a set of these to replace by current 9x63's that I use for casual astronomy and bird watching. When I say casual, I mean planets, 'bright' deep sky etc. I do use them with a tripod if I am not travelling. I friend of my as a pair of 12x36's Canon IS that are nice and light and seem to have a good flat field of focus. My questions a 1) Anyone using a pair of the bigger 15x or18x50mm's for Astronomy? 2) If so are they a bit heavy for sustained 'hand' use? Obviously they won't have the light grasp of my current pair and the exit pupil is small but on the face of it not having to us a tripod and the flat field the IS bit is a big plus for the Canons. Thanks for reading. Neil Miller Surrey, UK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil A. Miller" wrote in message ... Hello I am thinking of getting a set of these to replace by current 9x63's that I use for casual astronomy and bird watching. When I say casual, I mean planets, 'bright' deep sky etc. I do use them with a tripod if I am not travelling. I friend of my as a pair of 12x36's Canon IS that are nice and light and seem to have a good flat field of focus. My questions a 1) Anyone using a pair of the bigger 15x or18x50mm's for Astronomy? 2) If so are they a bit heavy for sustained 'hand' use? Obviously they won't have the light grasp of my current pair and the exit pupil is small but on the face of it not having to us a tripod and the flat field the IS bit is a big plus for the Canons. Thanks for reading. Neil Miller Surrey, UK I have the 15 x 50's and they are amazing. Great for observing - but they ARE heavy. You can't 'gaze' for long periods - or at least you need to find an elbow rest. I find the compromise acceptable. But if you want to see stuff without a tripod its the only way to go. Go to a shop and try for yourself. md |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Neil A. Miller
wrote Hello I am thinking of getting a set of these to replace by current 9x63's that I use for casual astronomy and bird watching. When I say casual, I mean planets, 'bright' deep sky etc. I do use them with a tripod if I am not travelling. I friend of my as a pair of 12x36's Canon IS that are nice and light and seem to have a good flat field of focus. My questions a 1) Anyone using a pair of the bigger 15x or18x50mm's for Astronomy? 2) If so are they a bit heavy for sustained 'hand' use? Obviously they won't have the light grasp of my current pair and the exit pupil is small but on the face of it not having to us a tripod and the flat field the IS bit is a big plus for the Canons. Thanks for reading. I have a pair of the 15x50's they work very well, they are heavy to hold for a long time but the IS allows you to still see things adequately even when your arms are starting to shake a bit. They do have a tripod mount though I have never done more than rest on things with them, mine seem to have a slight focus shift when I switch on the IS but that might be just me. I have a pair of Russian bins of the same size and the Cannon are much brighter. The thing I found most awkward at first was that they are fixed body which I was not used to and still occasionally find awkward if I have let my father use them, he has very different eye spacing to me. -- Roger 52:54:41N 01:30:05W Orion 127mm Maksutov, Canon 15x50 IS binoculars. Member WPAOG (White Peak Astronomical Observing Group). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Review: Orion 25x100 Binoculars (Part 1) | Sketcher | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | October 17th 05 02:58 PM |
Canon IS 10x30 binoculars - any good? / 100% waterproof cases for them?? | ship | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | May 11th 05 03:07 AM |
Dense fogs in Valles Marineris Mars. | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 243 | April 18th 05 07:04 PM |
U.Hawaii Astronomers Release First Image from Gigantic New InfraredCamera (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 14th 03 08:31 PM |
New Image of Comet Halley in the Cold | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 2nd 03 04:31 PM |